JoshuaPotter wrote:pepe1991 wrote:JoshuaPotter wrote:Womp womp. This is so hard to watch. We just do not have offensive firepower and that just isn't something I was expecting to say in 2025.
NBA offense in 2025 is nuclear warfare, Magic on offense have spears and stones

Since my return to watching basketball (my parents started dieing around the time Magic became bad and so when I say it was a little bit of "everything" that made me walk away it really was.) I missed the development of the NBA offense around the 3-ball. Simply put, I do understand the math behind how the current offense is supposed to work.
This isn't just a "stuck in our ways" approach. It's a little worse then that. We don't have to be a top 10 offense for me to love watching them play, I actually love putting defense first, but what we have done vs defense first is defense above literally anything else. In 80s / 90s era of baketball this would be fun and result in 60-70 point opponent games.
Too many offensively favorable rule changes + not enough players who can take advantage of the rule changes or at least have a step back 3 that is 30% accurate is pardon the expression, killing us.
Ugh, that's tough. My condolences. Hopefully you are doing better.
As for a league. How 3 point turned into actual thing? Imo two seasons were pivotal.
2013-14- Spurs revange season. Spurs lost in finals to Ray Allen 3 point shot in game 6. Lost game 7 within 2 possessions. Most people wrote them off as too old.
But 2013-14 was really different in terms of offensive efficiency. Pop always prefered "Euro" offense, basically 5 people invovled in offense and alive ball finding open players.
They weren't crazy on 3 FGA, but they finished season on 39,8% for 3 and were 1# three point shooting team in nba. All around they were 5th best offense.
But there was that " live by 3 die by 3 " mantra still alive. However, in playoffs two teams that went to finals were- Spurs- and Heat, and both teams were ranked 1# and 2# as teams with highest 3 point accuracy. With Spurs - ball moving, wide open 3 point shooting style crushed teams who on paper had more talent ( OKC, Heat).
In finals, Spurs just melted Heat with 3 point accuracy and idea was born.
Year after, Warriors & Curry and Klay take parts of Spurs offense ( pace, space, passing, alive ball concept of movement offense) and add another level to 3 point shooting. Second time in a row, nba champions are team with highest 3% but due sheer existence of Curry & Klay volume of shots goes up.
And that was pretty much it. I posted few days ago how nba is just bunch of copycat teams try to mimic current condenders & champions, and in matter of 1 year whole league went all in on 3 point shooting.
I would argue that league had to change years before, because most of other leagues played in style that is simialr to current nba style -20 years before nba. Why it didn't change? I guess because nobody won championship prior playing in such fashion. With Magic 2008, Suns 2007 being close.
NBA has floor is bigger than any other league, offensive players get away with ball carry, double dribbles, gather step exists nowhere but in nba. All those rules + great spacing means playing 1 on 1 is both: impossible to guard if offensive player is skilled and doubling great player is massive gamble.
Even average nba offense is near unguardable, too many moving parts at once, you can wear down any defene with enough off ball movment.
What's going on with Magic? Iso basketball. We play 2006 - Pistons vs Lakers basketball on offense. Give one guy ball and tell him to score, with others standing and doing nothing or next to nothing. But, at least to me, root problem is roster construction. Simply too many defensive specialist players that on normal team would be hidden on offense doing small roles. But with so many of them at once, they get exposed. So exposed that even Jeff Green looks like solid option in summer

Life is what happens when you're busy making other plans. -John Lennon