pepe1991 wrote:MaKiaVeLi7 wrote:pepe1991 wrote:
For start, you failed at first grade math, if over 420 shots he took were with 0 -1 dribble, it makes 50% of all his shots takend with 0-1 dribble, witch means he never had chance to take "500 out of 800 + shots" because he only took 846, and 420 were - with, at most single dribble![]()
Second, every time i hear somebody calling out for eye test, it simply means he lacks any tengable proof to confirm his claims.
You claimed that Ross "had to face two defenders in iso situations" so i went back to check, how many iso plays, Terrence Ross, over span of one year actually had, that ended with him shooting.
And... wait for it....
waaaiiiiit for it.
21 total.
So iso SHOT ATTEMPS made grand total of epic 2,48% of ALL SHOTS HE TOOK.
As i've said, your claim, has no ground in reality, matter of fact it just proves that "eye test " is as usless as submarine with screen doors.
I think no one can help you, Pepe. You are in love with interpreting empty and misleading (sometimes useless) statistics and use them as a tool to convince and talk people into believing something wrong.
You were the "jumping to conclusions" unhappy person who 'preached' that Cole would be a bust ... and the next failed Magic pick ... and an "ineffective chucker" ... and "bad playmaker" ... and "turnover machine" ... and so on and on.
Comming off person who made full real gm page based on 3 games sample size, gizzing over rookie, it's actually compliment![]()
I'm not "in love " with stats, people like you simply can't understand what statistic for basketball even means. It literally just measuring things in numberic system that occured on the floor.
Every single nba team is having deep analytic department- because it's important and because- it works.
I'm very far from unhappy person, but you don't know anything about me, and you can't prove anything you post, so you have to go into this personal jabs at me to prove anything i wrote - wrong. Witch, actually tells me a lot about you.
But even by reading your comments- 30 something years old, eastern europe, guy, living with his parents, used to think you are cool because you had 2pac shirt in 2000 when everybody was into 50 cent ,you were "edgy " kid.
It's funny how you manage to leave me SPEECHLESS and with a lot to say in the same time (but manors, come on, you can't say that). I won't!
I'm respectfully asking you: just keep misinterpreting stats and don't bother me, it's a waste of my time. Many people around here know it, I'm the last guy to find it out, won't be the last though.
Just do your "stats juggling thing" and manipulate someone else, if you please!
