ImageImageImage

What are Rivers/Morey thinking by continuing to start P.J. Tucker?

Moderators: BullyKing, HartfordWhalers, sixers hoops, Foshan, Sixerscan

User avatar
76ciology
RealGM
Posts: 65,756
And1: 26,791
Joined: Jun 06, 2002

Re: What are Rivers/Morey thinking by continuing to start P.J. Tucker? 

Post#21 » by 76ciology » Thu Dec 29, 2022 6:46 am

ExplosionsInDaSky wrote:Double big with who? Reed? We already tried this with a much better big in Al Horford. Morey is going to have to take a look at who he can get in a trade. As of right now Shake and Thybulle are his best available trade chips.


I think Al would be perfect with our top 4 guys. Reed is chaos, I dont see him being a starter in the league. Ideally you want stability with your starting unit, you dont get it with Reed
There’s never been a time in history when we look back and say that the people who were censoring free speech were the good guys.
ExplosionsInDaSky
RealGM
Posts: 21,276
And1: 5,410
Joined: Mar 17, 2004

Re: What are Rivers/Morey thinking by continuing to start P.J. Tucker? 

Post#22 » by ExplosionsInDaSky » Thu Dec 29, 2022 4:49 pm

76ciology wrote:
ExplosionsInDaSky wrote:Double big with who? Reed? We already tried this with a much better big in Al Horford. Morey is going to have to take a look at who he can get in a trade. As of right now Shake and Thybulle are his best available trade chips.


I think Al would be perfect with our top 4 guys. Reed is chaos, I dont see him being a starter in the league. Ideally you want stability with your starting unit, you dont get it with Reed


I've always thought Jaren Jackson jr would be the perfect big to play next to Embiid. You're right about Paul Reed...It's chaos. He makes plays on defense, but he's frantic on offense and can't stretch the floor.
phillynative
General Manager
Posts: 9,396
And1: 3,025
Joined: Dec 13, 2014

Re: What are Rivers/Morey thinking by continuing to start P.J. Tucker? 

Post#23 » by phillynative » Thu Dec 29, 2022 8:01 pm

Jay555 wrote:I think PJ should be fine come playoffs. He was garbage in the regular season last year with the Heat and did his thing when it counted most. Yes he’s older, but his playing style/physicality is made for playoffs when refs swallow their whistles.

We do need to rest him as much as we can and keep him fresh for the playoffs. Let him get healthy now and play him 20 minutes a game when he’s recovered from his hand injury.

Similarly, can doc stop playing Harden 40+ mins a game? What a disaster. The team still needs a couple more trades to bolster the 3/4/5 positions. A 3 & D wing would be sweet although unlikely. And a backup C like Andre Drummond who can fill the rebounding holes of this team?


I keep hearing about how tucker is a playoff piece and not a regular season piece. I have my doubts about what he will be able to do on the floor with this team when the playoffs come around. It has more to do with how this team built compared to the Heat or Bucks when he played well with them. On the Bucks he played next to Giannis , Portis and Lopez and with the Heat he played between Bam and Butler. I think Tucker was a better fit with those last two teams because their size and athleticism made up for Tuckers lack there of. His physicality and toughness complimented what they already had.

The Sixers are small at every position despite joel embiid who I hate to say plays smaller than his size and are asking a 6'5 37 y.o to defend the best wings and forwards every night. .We have struggled to rebound the ball all year and lack length on the wings also pairing him with Tobias just exacerbates how slow this team really is.

Im concerned with how this team will be able to compete against the Celtics , Bucks , Nets and Cavs in the playoffs with our lack of size, length and rebounding ability. Tucker doesn't really help us there. It goes back to the construction of this roster.
User avatar
76ciology
RealGM
Posts: 65,756
And1: 26,791
Joined: Jun 06, 2002

Re: What are Rivers/Morey thinking by continuing to start P.J. Tucker? 

Post#24 » by 76ciology » Fri Dec 30, 2022 4:38 am

ExplosionsInDaSky wrote:
76ciology wrote:
ExplosionsInDaSky wrote:Double big with who? Reed? We already tried this with a much better big in Al Horford. Morey is going to have to take a look at who he can get in a trade. As of right now Shake and Thybulle are his best available trade chips.


I think Al would be perfect with our top 4 guys. Reed is chaos, I dont see him being a starter in the league. Ideally you want stability with your starting unit, you dont get it with Reed


I've always thought Jaren Jackson jr would be the perfect big to play next to Embiid. You're right about Paul Reed...It's chaos. He makes plays on defense, but he's frantic on offense and can't stretch the floor.


Oh yeah. JJJ would be perfect also :D
There’s never been a time in history when we look back and say that the people who were censoring free speech were the good guys.
User avatar
76ciology
RealGM
Posts: 65,756
And1: 26,791
Joined: Jun 06, 2002

Re: What are Rivers/Morey thinking by continuing to start P.J. Tucker? 

Post#25 » by 76ciology » Fri Dec 30, 2022 4:40 am

Tucker. Let him defend PGs and switch to centers, or defend centers and switch to PGs. Then you let guys like Melton, Tobias and Embiid roam for rebounding and deflections defense. Thats how you max him out.

His role right now is more suited for a Mikal Bridges type defender. So his lack of deflections and rebounding is frustrating you
There’s never been a time in history when we look back and say that the people who were censoring free speech were the good guys.
Kova
Veteran
Posts: 2,558
And1: 762
Joined: Jan 02, 2009
Location: Croatia
     

Re: What are Rivers/Morey thinking by continuing to start P.J. Tucker? 

Post#26 » by Kova » Fri Dec 30, 2022 9:17 am

The stupidest thread on the board. But very useful to understand who knows a thing about team sports and who never picked up any kind of ball in their life.
phillynative
General Manager
Posts: 9,396
And1: 3,025
Joined: Dec 13, 2014

Re: What are Rivers/Morey thinking by continuing to start P.J. Tucker? 

Post#27 » by phillynative » Sat Dec 31, 2022 2:30 pm

Tucker will explode in the playoffs. From getting cooked by any starting forwards we may play.

Eastern playoff teams

Celtics- Tatum( High release point, height advantage) Horford( longer, bigger, just as strong). If they play the big lineup we will be at a disadvantage on the boards.

Bucks-Giannis(lol) , Portis

Nets- KD(only a prayer that his shot is off) Ben,

Cavs-Mobley( tall , athletic , rebound and lob threat)

Atleast have a player that makes up for his weaknesses(athleticism, length). Theoretical that would be Reed but Doc doesn't trust him and he can't play next to Embiid.

76ers came into the season with a bunch of slow,short PFs / undersized centers and small wings; knowing what we may face in the playoffs. Im not sure what Morey and Doc are thinking.
davesilver
Junior
Posts: 452
And1: 255
Joined: Aug 14, 2020
     

Re: What are Rivers/Morey thinking by continuing to start P.J. Tucker? 

Post#28 » by davesilver » Sat Dec 31, 2022 2:56 pm

phillynative wrote:Tucker will explode in the playoffs. From getting cooked by any starting forwards we may play.

Eastern playoff teams

Celtics- Tatum( High release point, height advantage) Horford( longer, bigger, just as strong). If they play the big lineup we will be at a disadvantage on the boards.

Bucks-Giannis(lol) , Portis

Nets- KD(only a prayer that his shot is off) Ben,

Cavs-Mobley( tall , athletic , rebound and lob threat)

Atleast have a player that makes up for his weaknesses(athleticism, length). Theoretical that would be Reed but Doc doesn't trust him and he can't play next to Embiid.

76ers came into the season with a bunch of slow,short PFs / undersized centers and small wings; knowing what we may face in the playoffs. Im not sure what Morey and Doc are thinking.


It’s clear to me our missing piece is a tall sharpshooting PF who can rebound and defend secondary to Embiid. Targets are Porzingis Lauri Siakam (eh) and (maybe) MPJ?
Kobblehead
RealGM
Posts: 40,842
And1: 19,998
Joined: Apr 15, 2010
 

Re: What are Rivers/Morey thinking by continuing to start P.J. Tucker? 

Post#29 » by Kobblehead » Sat Dec 31, 2022 6:16 pm

P.J. Tucker is the worst player in the entire NBA playing over 25 mpg. This is worse than Wilson Chandler.
youngcrev
RealGM
Posts: 28,752
And1: 9,662
Joined: Jun 12, 2005
Location: Philadelphia(ish)
   

Re: What are Rivers/Morey thinking by continuing to start P.J. Tucker? 

Post#30 » by youngcrev » Sat Dec 31, 2022 7:08 pm

davesilver wrote:
phillynative wrote:Tucker will explode in the playoffs. From getting cooked by any starting forwards we may play.

Eastern playoff teams

Celtics- Tatum( High release point, height advantage) Horford( longer, bigger, just as strong). If they play the big lineup we will be at a disadvantage on the boards.

Bucks-Giannis(lol) , Portis

Nets- KD(only a prayer that his shot is off) Ben,

Cavs-Mobley( tall , athletic , rebound and lob threat)

Atleast have a player that makes up for his weaknesses(athleticism, length). Theoretical that would be Reed but Doc doesn't trust him and he can't play next to Embiid.

76ers came into the season with a bunch of slow,short PFs / undersized centers and small wings; knowing what we may face in the playoffs. Im not sure what Morey and Doc are thinking.


It’s clear to me our missing piece is a tall sharpshooting PF who can rebound and defend secondary to Embiid. Targets are Porzingis Lauri Siakam (eh) and (maybe) MPJ?


A more realistic target would be someone like PJ Washington or Robert Covington if shooting and secondary rim protection are the goal.
User avatar
76ciology
RealGM
Posts: 65,756
And1: 26,791
Joined: Jun 06, 2002

Re: What are Rivers/Morey thinking by continuing to start P.J. Tucker? 

Post#31 » by 76ciology » Sun Mar 12, 2023 4:40 pm

76ciology wrote:Tucker. Let him defend PGs and switch to centers, or defend centers and switch to PGs. Then you let guys like Melton, Tobias and Embiid roam for rebounding and deflections defense. Thats how you max him out.


There’s never been a time in history when we look back and say that the people who were censoring free speech were the good guys.

Return to Philadelphia 76ers