Kobblehead wrote:P2K, you've been stewing in a pool of your own piss for like a week now.
Okay, my bad.

Moderators: HartfordWhalers, BullyKing, sixers hoops, Foshan, Sixerscan
Kobblehead wrote:P2K, you've been stewing in a pool of your own piss for like a week now.
P2K wrote:Los5782 wrote:P2K wrote:But wait...Embiid is a sure deal of being a superstar.
Only a year of recuperation and you have a top 3 player in the game for sure. Right?
Indeed, pretty much. If Embiid can stay healthy, with his skill set, athleticism, & size he has the potential to be a dominant post presence, there really aren't many in the league right now, I dare say there aren't any. Dwight is good, off sheer athleticism for the most part & he's around 6'10", he's probably the best big man right now. Embiid is a legit 7ft+ center, with a nice touch & footwork, range on his shot & athleticism, we've seen a sample size of what he can do. He can dominate not only because of the lack of talent at the position, but those Olajuwon comparisons are no fluke, but a testament to his rapidly expanding amazing skill set. Wing driven league? Yeah sure, but a dominant post presence like what Embiid projects to be changes everything, the entire game plan & affects every position on the opposing team.
^^^Ah see. There you go. My proof.
CoreyGallagher wrote:I hope the Cavs don't take Embiid because then we'll take Embiid.
Los5782 wrote:P2K wrote:Los5782 wrote:
Indeed, pretty much. If Embiid can stay healthy, with his skill set, athleticism, & size he has the potential to be a dominant post presence, there really aren't many in the league right now, I dare say there aren't any. Dwight is good, off sheer athleticism for the most part & he's around 6'10", he's probably the best big man right now. Embiid is a legit 7ft+ center, with a nice touch & footwork, range on his shot & athleticism, we've seen a sample size of what he can do. He can dominate not only because of the lack of talent at the position, but those Olajuwon comparisons are no fluke, but a testament to his rapidly expanding amazing skill set. Wing driven league? Yeah sure, but a dominant post presence like what Embiid projects to be changes everything, the entire game plan & affects every position on the opposing team.
^^^Ah see. There you go. My proof.
Ah I see, lol you're one of those types who only point out what they feel is convenient lol. You completely ignored my first post, but yeah I probably expressed my thoughts incorrectly. What I should of said in that opening sentence for you is Indeed, pretty much. If Embiid can stay healthy, with his skill set, athleticism, & size he has the potential to be a dominant post presence, & if he reaches his [u][i]POTENTIAL would likely turn into a top 3 player in the league[/i]; there really aren't many (dominant big men) in the league right now, I dare say there aren't any.[/u]
CoreyGallagher wrote:P2K wrote:Los5782 wrote:
Indeed, pretty much. If Embiid can stay healthy, with his skill set, athleticism, & size he has the potential to be a dominant post presence, there really aren't many in the league right now, I dare say there aren't any. Dwight is good, off sheer athleticism for the most part & he's around 6'10", he's probably the best big man right now. Embiid is a legit 7ft+ center, with a nice touch & footwork, range on his shot & athleticism, we've seen a sample size of what he can do. He can dominate not only because of the lack of talent at the position, but those Olajuwon comparisons are no fluke, but a testament to his rapidly expanding amazing skill set. Wing driven league? Yeah sure, but a dominant post presence like what Embiid projects to be changes everything, the entire game plan & affects every position on the opposing team.
^^^Ah see. There you go. My proof.
That's not your proof, by him saying 'pretty much' that's him cushioning from your stance to his own. He said he has the potential to be a dominant post presence, and surely didn't say he would be a top 3 player in the game. Everything he said has merit.
P2K wrote:Look above.
CoreyGallagher wrote:P2K wrote:But wait...Embiid is a sure deal of being a superstar.
Only a year of recuperation and you have a top 3 player in the game for sure. Right?
I'm honestly wondering who claimed this exactly, care to quote or link? I want that though, exactly that, not proposing it as a possibility, I want exactly that he is assuredly going to be a top 3 player in the game.
CoreyGallagher wrote:I hope the Cavs don't take Embiid because then we'll take Embiid.
P2K wrote:CoreyGallagher wrote:P2K wrote:
^^^Ah see. There you go. My proof.
That's not your proof, by him saying 'pretty much' that's him cushioning from your stance to his own. He said he has the potential to be a dominant post presence, and surely didn't say he would be a top 3 player in the game. Everything he said has merit.
Look above.
CoreyGallagher wrote:P2K wrote:Look above.
I regret to see how him saying he has potential to be a top 3 player is the same as him saying he assuredly will be a top 3 player...CoreyGallagher wrote:P2K wrote:But wait...Embiid is a sure deal of being a superstar.
Only a year of recuperation and you have a top 3 player in the game for sure. Right?
I'm honestly wondering who claimed this exactly, care to quote or link? I want that though, exactly that, not proposing it as a possibility, I want exactly that he is assuredly going to be a top 3 player in the game.
You're an idiot.
CoreyGallagher wrote:P2K wrote:Look above.
I regret to see how him saying he has potential to be a top 3 player is the same as him saying he assuredly will be a top 3 player...CoreyGallagher wrote:P2K wrote:But wait...Embiid is a sure deal of being a superstar.
Only a year of recuperation and you have a top 3 player in the game for sure. Right?
I'm honestly wondering who claimed this exactly, care to quote or link? I want that though, exactly that, not proposing it as a possibility, I want exactly that he is assuredly going to be a top 3 player in the game.
You're an idiot.
Los5782 wrote:CoreyGallagher wrote:P2K wrote:Look above.
I regret to see how him saying he has potential to be a top 3 player is the same as him saying he assuredly will be a top 3 player...CoreyGallagher wrote:I'm honestly wondering who claimed this exactly, care to quote or link? I want that though, exactly that, not proposing it as a possibility, I want exactly that he is assuredly going to be a top 3 player in the game.
You're an idiot.
Yes! Thank you lol, this is basically my point. I PERSONALLY feel if he can stay healthy the potential to be dominant & top 3 in the league is there. No one is bragging about how we got a player in the draft that will be top 3, no one has even brought this up that I've seen other than P2K.
WorldBeFree wrote:I feel like p2k is messing with you guys... Leave him alone he is just concerned about the future of a team that we all love. If embiid busts out he just want to be able to say "i told you" and if not who cares because everybody will be happy
Sent from my D2303 using RealGM Forums mobile app
P2K wrote:I apologize that you took everything so literally. But there's no need for name calling
CoreyGallagher wrote:I hope the Cavs don't take Embiid because then we'll take Embiid.
CoreyGallagher wrote:To me it seems as if you've been intentionally antagonizing the past few days, it's just getting annoying.
We can only make assumptions as to why Cleveland and Milwaukee passed on Embiid, yet you're seemingly wanting something more legitimate that we can't possibly give you.
P2K wrote:Excuse me? Embiid was said to be by far the best prospect in the draft. An injury that would keep him sidelined for a few months with no other issues wouldn't deter other teams from picking him UNLESS there was something else scaring them.
Don't get it f'd up. The Sixers are just as crappy as Cleveland and Milwaukee. So we are all even in needing that one player to get us out of the toilet. It should scare all of us that Cleveland and Milwaukee passed on Embiid.
And again...whenever you have to attach the "if healthy" tag to a player, that is never good.
CoreyGallagher wrote:I hope the Cavs don't take Embiid because then we'll take Embiid.
P2K wrote:So why didn't Cleveland or Milwaukee take Embiid?
"I think it's hard to take Embiid," Lasry said Monday at a joint breakfast meeting of the region's Rotary Club and the Milwaukee Press Club. "I think he's a phenomenal individual, but with the injury and not knowing how severe or long it will take to recover, I think for us today we're going to want somebody who's going to help us on Day One."
"Nobody's coming to Milwaukee if the team does what it did last year," said Lasry, who added that the payroll would increase.
P2K wrote:CoreyGallagher wrote:To me it seems as if you've been intentionally antagonizing the past few days, it's just getting annoying.
Posters around here pretending that there isn't a risk of being injury-prone is annoying to me, so the feeling is mutual.We can only make assumptions as to why Cleveland and Milwaukee passed on Embiid, yet you're seemingly wanting something more legitimate that we can't possibly give you.
Excuse me? Embiid was said to be by far the best prospect in the draft. An injury that would keep him sidelined for a few months with no other issues wouldn't deter other teams from picking him UNLESS there was something else scaring them.
Don't get it f'd up. The Sixers are just as crappy as Cleveland and Milwaukee. So we are all even in needing that one player to get us out of the toilet. It should scare all of us that Cleveland and Milwaukee passed on Embiid.
And again...whenever you have to attach the "if healthy" tag to a player, that is never good.
76ciology wrote:P2K wrote:CoreyGallagher wrote:To me it seems as if you've been intentionally antagonizing the past few days, it's just getting annoying.
Posters around here pretending that there isn't a risk of being injury-prone is annoying to me, so the feeling is mutual.We can only make assumptions as to why Cleveland and Milwaukee passed on Embiid, yet you're seemingly wanting something more legitimate that we can't possibly give you.
Excuse me? Embiid was said to be by far the best prospect in the draft. An injury that would keep him sidelined for a few months with no other issues wouldn't deter other teams from picking him UNLESS there was something else scaring them.
Don't get it f'd up. The Sixers are just as crappy as Cleveland and Milwaukee. So we are all even in needing that one player to get us out of the toilet. It should scare all of us that Cleveland and Milwaukee passed on Embiid.
And again...whenever you have to attach the "if healthy" tag to a player, that is never good.
That's speculation.
If you based it on speculation, you'll be scared on selecting Embiid. But if you have the medical records and base your decision on facts like the Celtics,Magic (as per rumor) Cavs, Bucks, Lakers (as per rumor) and the Sixers, you would just look at it nothing more than a short term injury.
76ciology wrote:[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lRPg3f3lPiQ[/youtube]
Just listen 10:32 to 12:30
Bill Simmons:
Embiid moved like a gazelle opposite of Oden who moves in different direction. Embiid moves up and down the court without effort like Ibaka or Griffin. So on eyetest, he thinks there's no structurally wrong with Embiid.
Chad Ford:
One theory by a team doctor was Embiid body's body was growing by such a rapid rate by he remains to be a great athlete that he put unbelievable torque in his growing body. But then if you strengthen his core and his body quits growing and puts him in a good nutritional plan all the stuffs goes away.
76ciology wrote:P2K wrote:CoreyGallagher wrote:To me it seems as if you've been intentionally antagonizing the past few days, it's just getting annoying.
Posters around here pretending that there isn't a risk of being injury-prone is annoying to me, so the feeling is mutual.We can only make assumptions as to why Cleveland and Milwaukee passed on Embiid, yet you're seemingly wanting something more legitimate that we can't possibly give you.
Excuse me? Embiid was said to be by far the best prospect in the draft. An injury that would keep him sidelined for a few months with no other issues wouldn't deter other teams from picking him UNLESS there was something else scaring them.
Don't get it f'd up. The Sixers are just as crappy as Cleveland and Milwaukee. So we are all even in needing that one player to get us out of the toilet. It should scare all of us that Cleveland and Milwaukee passed on Embiid.
And again...whenever you have to attach the "if healthy" tag to a player, that is never good.
That's speculation.
Like I said, if you based it on speculation, you'll be scared on selecting Embiid. But if you have the medical records and base your decision on facts like the Celtics,Magic (as per Chris Mannix) Cavs, Bucks, Lakers (as per rumor) and the Sixers, you would just look at it nothing more than a short term injury.