Stanford wrote:DCasey91 wrote:Will be surprised if we do match.
So he's not being poached. We're giving him away.
Umm we could have offered him a contract beforehand no?
Moderators: HartfordWhalers, BullyKing, sixers hoops, Foshan, Sixerscan
Stanford wrote:DCasey91 wrote:Will be surprised if we do match.
So he's not being poached. We're giving him away.
sixers hoops wrote:DCasey91 wrote:Stanford wrote:
They can match.
Going from the report well most likely be in the tax anyway. Going from estimates not matching saves the owner upwards of 10-15 million including repeater tax the year after
Uber rich don’t get Uber rich by wasting on the skim it’s the opposite (use the skim on the top to reimburse/remanouver asset management)
And the way it’s going in the off season the memo is no tax.
Will be surprised if we do match.
I think the plan was to cross our fingers and hope he has to take the qualifying offer. When it appeared he was going to get a contract offer, they signed Bamba and Harrell to cover themselves. They are ways to match the contract and maneuver out of the tax, but I don’t know if that is happening.
Negrodamus wrote:A more realistic trade for Tobi would be to Charlotte for Terry Rozier, Nick Richards, and Cody Martin. Two young guys who have shown flashes of excellent role playing and a microwave scorer. All three of those guys have 3 years left on their deal. With Paul Reed likely moving on, Nick Richards would be an excellent backup to Embiid.
I imagine Rozier would have to come off the bench with Maxey as a starter. If Harden is to be traded, it'd be nice to have a legitimate ball handler on the roster.
Not great, but Tobias isn't great either. And maybe he can teach the idiots on Charlotte to leave the guns/abuse; take the books.
sixers hoops wrote:Jay555 wrote:As said, the plan for the offseason is to avoid tax.
I think the plan is always to avoid the repeater tax, so they will always be careful regarding the luxury tax. However, Morey has to be smart enough to plan ahead to avoid boxing himself in with some of these bad contracts. If I were Harris, I wouldn’t pay the tax either. This team isn’t even a top 5 favorite. If I’m paying the tax, build me a team that has a really good shot at a title.

DCasey91 wrote:Stanford wrote:DCasey91 wrote:Will be surprised if we do match.
So he's not being poached. We're giving him away.
Umm we could have offered him a contract beforehand no?


Slacktard wrote:sixers hoops wrote:Jay555 wrote:As said, the plan for the offseason is to avoid tax.
I think the plan is always to avoid the repeater tax, so they will always be careful regarding the luxury tax. However, Morey has to be smart enough to plan ahead to avoid boxing himself in with some of these bad contracts. If I were Harris, I wouldn’t pay the tax either. This team isn’t even a top 5 favorite. If I’m paying the tax, build me a team that has a really good shot at a title.
Are they avoiding 'bad contracts' or are they enacting the finances that the owner wants? You see other franchises who are at the top teams in their conference see their luxury tax bill go up because they keep their core around and it goes up in salary. Somehow the Sixers luxury tax has gone down every year the last 3 seasons. I think it went from like $25M to $13M, to last year being likely $0.
I think we all knew when Butler was acquired it was going to be legally possible to re-sign all of that team using bird rights, but doing so would be immensely costly for the luxury tax. So that didn't happen.
I think Harris biggest priority with the Sixers is the new arena. Obviously gutting a roster doesn't help with public opinion towards a new building... but I think he may be beginning to realize how uphill of a battle it may be and decide to start cutting his losses with the team. I think there's VERY LITTLE chance that the Sixers are going to treat Maxey's contract as a "OK. Let's sign another max FA, get to the cap and then jump $30m+ over it with Maxey's bird rights.
After next year the Sixers have I think 7 seasons left on the Well's Fargo Center lease. If something doesn't break in his favor for an approved downtown arena in the next year or so I wouldn't be surprised if there's feelers put out to Seattle and see what he might 'get' given to him. I don't think Vegas is a possibility since the locals don't even really want the A's and I think they'd say "move in with the hockey team"
Stanford wrote:DCasey91 wrote:Stanford wrote:
So he's not being poached. We're giving him away.
Umm we could have offered him a contract beforehand no?
And we can also match his contract offer. Still.

DCasey91 wrote:Stanford wrote:DCasey91 wrote:
Umm we could have offered him a contract beforehand no?
And we can also match his contract offer. Still.
You still don’t get it. Why would we match when the off season moves paints a different story. It goes further into the tax if we do, not extending and waiting on Maxey, signing Bamba/Harrell opening up the books etc.
It’s kind of illogical now unless it’s out of pure ego.
To poach someone is to take in an unfair way. Which Ainge did (smart move but ethically different story) but the game is the game.
sixers hoops wrote:I know we can debate who is more at fault - Morey or Harris. Either way, Morey seems like he really doesn’t know what he is doing. His bad moves are piling up.
sixers hoops wrote:DCasey91 wrote:Stanford wrote:
And we can also match his contract offer. Still.
You still don’t get it. Why would we match when the off season moves paints a different story. It goes further into the tax if we do, not extending and waiting on Maxey, signing Bamba/Harrell opening up the books etc.
It’s kind of illogical now unless it’s out of pure ego.
To poach someone is to take in an unfair way. Which Ainge did (smart move but ethically different story) but the game is the game.
Teams routinely wait for restricted free agents to sign an offer sheet, then match. It makes more sense to let them test the market, than negotiating against yourself. And a good agent would see what offers are out there anyway.
I’m not being sarcastic, unless I’m missing something, I don’t see how it’s illogical

DCasey91 wrote:sixers hoops wrote:DCasey91 wrote:
You still don’t get it. Why would we match when the off season moves paints a different story. It goes further into the tax if we do, not extending and waiting on Maxey, signing Bamba/Harrell opening up the books etc.
It’s kind of illogical now unless it’s out of pure ego.
To poach someone is to take in an unfair way. Which Ainge did (smart move but ethically different story) but the game is the game.
Teams routinely wait for restricted free agents to sign an offer sheet, then match. It makes more sense to let them test the market, than negotiating against yourself. And a good agent would see what offers are out there anyway.
I’m not being sarcastic, unless I’m missing something, I don’t see how it’s illogical
Oh I meant illogical after the fact to match the offer now.
The testing of the market is a direction from both parties which can carry inherent risk. Wasn’t a player saying I’ll bet on myself and got a harsh dose of reality in the end he was a philly player too at one point lol

DCasey91 wrote:To poach someone is to take in an unfair way.
sixers hoops wrote:eyeatoma wrote:Think the problem is that we can't offer a max to a 10 year player if we sign Reed.Stanford wrote:Who cares if the second and third seasons are guaranteed. We want him around for another 3 seasons.
I haven’t looked that close, but next season we will have a ton of cap space. We only have Embiid, Tucker, Maxey caphold, and Springer option. How is Paul Reed making a difference?

ExplosionsInDaSky wrote:Harris IS an expiring. Why trade him for...Expirings?
I think we'll eventually round out the bench with someone who can score. Not going to panic just yet, but I am mad about Reed. I really think we should hold on to him.