davesilver wrote:76ciology wrote:davesilver wrote:
In a playoff series I'm comfortable putting Ben on the best player. I'm not comfortable with Randle doing the same
Ok. Then the player calls for a screen. Then just pulls up for a jumper. Duncan Robinson scored 26pts getting chased by Ben. How? He got open looks with screen plays.
Defense is a concept sold to mediocre teams to make them believe they have a chance. When the best offensive players are on contenders like Brooklyn. Im not saying defense is not important, it’s just offense is lopsidedly more important. This league has turned this game into a contest of offensive firepower.
With Randle, I may have a chance to improve my points per possession off a Milton, Maxey or Seth PnR with Randle.
With Ben, I took a step back on my halfcourt offense while defensively teams can find a way to make him ineffective.
Eh that's not really true. You can absolutely be a championship team with a defensive identity. I agree that most contending teams have an offensive-minded structure, but if a very strong defense gives us an overall better net rating, I'd say that's more effective than a better offense, worse defense, and a lower overall net rating.
I'd rather be a #1 defensive team, with a #8 offense than a #4 offense and a #10 defense, which is probably what we'd get by subbing out Ben with Randle.
But I'd agree with you in that I'd probably prefer a #1 offense and a #8 defense to the inverse. Great offense almost always beats out great defense in today's game
Yup.
Anyway, i hope people dont get me wrong im not pushing for a Ben for Randle trade ok?


















