ImageImageImage

The Ben Simmons Megathread - Part IV

Moderators: HartfordWhalers, BullyKing, Foshan, Sixerscan, sixers hoops

User avatar
76ciology
RealGM
Posts: 66,224
And1: 27,120
Joined: Jun 06, 2002

Re: The Ben Simmons Megathread - Part IV 

Post#1441 » by 76ciology » Mon Jan 18, 2021 4:25 pm

davesilver wrote:
76ciology wrote:
davesilver wrote:
In a playoff series I'm comfortable putting Ben on the best player. I'm not comfortable with Randle doing the same


Ok. Then the player calls for a screen. Then just pulls up for a jumper. Duncan Robinson scored 26pts getting chased by Ben. How? He got open looks with screen plays.

Defense is a concept sold to mediocre teams to make them believe they have a chance. When the best offensive players are on contenders like Brooklyn. Im not saying defense is not important, it’s just offense is lopsidedly more important. This league has turned this game into a contest of offensive firepower.

With Randle, I may have a chance to improve my points per possession off a Milton, Maxey or Seth PnR with Randle.

With Ben, I took a step back on my halfcourt offense while defensively teams can find a way to make him ineffective.


Eh that's not really true. You can absolutely be a championship team with a defensive identity. I agree that most contending teams have an offensive-minded structure, but if a very strong defense gives us an overall better net rating, I'd say that's more effective than a better offense, worse defense, and a lower overall net rating.

I'd rather be a #1 defensive team, with a #8 offense than a #4 offense and a #10 defense, which is probably what we'd get by subbing out Ben with Randle.

But I'd agree with you in that I'd probably prefer a #1 offense and a #8 defense to the inverse. Great offense almost always beats out great defense in today's game


Yup.

Anyway, i hope people dont get me wrong im not pushing for a Ben for Randle trade ok? :lol:
There’s never been a time in history when we look back and say that the people who were censoring free speech were the good guys.
youngcrev
RealGM
Posts: 28,786
And1: 9,699
Joined: Jun 12, 2005
Location: Philadelphia(ish)
   

Re: The Ben Simmons Megathread - Part IV 

Post#1442 » by youngcrev » Mon Jan 18, 2021 4:26 pm

phifans wrote:I just don't get why you guys keep lowering your expectations and standards for Ben ? Does that benefit the whole team since he can't reach his potential for whatever reasons then you decide you are gonna be satisfied with him to be a defensive specialist who barely has one offensive skillset just to be an acceptable offensive player ?

Is that what you guys hoped for when he got picked four years ago ? Is that what you expected after his amazing rookie season back to 2017 ?

Or maybe it's just too hard to call it the end of our hope...


I'm pretty sure everyone finds him frustrating, but this seems like you're kinda ignoring that he's currently a good player in spite of it. I also think it would be foolish to ignore that there's a clear path for improvement, even if it seems less likely he achieves it the longer we wait. Honestly though, I don't really know what people were expecting coming into this year in terms of him getting better during a shortened off-season in which he was hurt.

If you can get a star for him, have at it. But it seems like people are at a stage now where they want to trade him just to get rid of him, which is ridiculous.
youngcrev
RealGM
Posts: 28,786
And1: 9,699
Joined: Jun 12, 2005
Location: Philadelphia(ish)
   

Re: The Ben Simmons Megathread - Part IV 

Post#1443 » by youngcrev » Mon Jan 18, 2021 4:28 pm

76ciology wrote:
davesilver wrote:
76ciology wrote:We’ll see. It’s gonna be one of the discussions that would be fun to look back in the future.

Personally, I think Randle was nowhere near Ben from 2014-2018.

He improved from 2018 to 2020, to near Ben’s level, or atleast was moving upwards to Ben’s level.

But he has definitely surpassed Ben this season. Where Randle’s improvement and Ben’s decline both played its part.

What’s uncertain is if Ben and Randle can both continue playing at this level.


In a playoff series I'm comfortable putting Ben on the best player. I'm not comfortable with Randle doing the same


Ok. Then the player calls for a screen. Then just pulls up for a jumper. Duncan Robinson scored 26pts getting chased by Ben. How? He got open looks with screen plays.

Defense is a concept sold to mediocre teams to make them believe they have a chance. When the best offensive players are on contenders like Brooklyn. Im not saying defense is not important, it’s just offense is lopsidedly more important. This league has turned this game into a contest of offensive firepower.

With Randle, I may have a chance to improve my points per possession off a Milton, Maxey or Seth PnR with Randle.

With Ben, I took a step back on my halfcourt offense while defensively teams can find a way to make him ineffective.


How many teams have won a championship that didn't have a top-10 defense?
User avatar
76ciology
RealGM
Posts: 66,224
And1: 27,120
Joined: Jun 06, 2002

Re: The Ben Simmons Megathread - Part IV 

Post#1444 » by 76ciology » Mon Jan 18, 2021 4:30 pm

youngcrev wrote:
76ciology wrote:
davesilver wrote:
In a playoff series I'm comfortable putting Ben on the best player. I'm not comfortable with Randle doing the same


Ok. Then the player calls for a screen. Then just pulls up for a jumper. Duncan Robinson scored 26pts getting chased by Ben. How? He got open looks with screen plays.

Defense is a concept sold to mediocre teams to make them believe they have a chance. When the best offensive players are on contenders like Brooklyn. Im not saying defense is not important, it’s just offense is lopsidedly more important. This league has turned this game into a contest of offensive firepower.

With Randle, I may have a chance to improve my points per possession off a Milton, Maxey or Seth PnR with Randle.

With Ben, I took a step back on my halfcourt offense while defensively teams can find a way to make him ineffective.


How many teams have won a championship that didn't have a top-10 defense?


Again..

Im not saying defense is not important.

Im just saying offense is way more important. And you should also be able to play good defense.

And btw, I do think we can still be a great defensive team without Ben by replacing him with a 3&D guy like Otto Porter or Jerami Grant.

You can’t win the championship with great defense and middle of the pack offense like what we are right now.
There’s never been a time in history when we look back and say that the people who were censoring free speech were the good guys.
6ers83
Senior
Posts: 603
And1: 195
Joined: Jul 14, 2020

Re: The Ben Simmons Megathread - Part IV 

Post#1445 » by 6ers83 » Mon Jan 18, 2021 4:54 pm

User avatar
76ciology
RealGM
Posts: 66,224
And1: 27,120
Joined: Jun 06, 2002

Re: The Ben Simmons Megathread - Part IV 

Post#1446 » by 76ciology » Mon Jan 18, 2021 6:43 pm

3 teams that have assets and would overpay for Ben:

1.) Nuggets
- their defense is suffering. Specially now that they have to play alot of MPJ. Ben is also a super great fit for Jokic, Murray and even MPJ.
- I’d imagine they’d be willing to pay the Nets pick package for Ben.
- Murray-Barton-MPJ-Ben-Jokic

2.) Wolves
- KAT and Ben is just perfect. Wolves can trade the farm and build around Edwards, Ben and KAT.
- Edwards-Ben-KAT trio

3.) Kings
- Kings has a problematic defense with really good offense. Ben also compliments Fox and Hield. Rumor even has it that we involved the Kings that has a scenario that has Ben shipped there for Bagley and a handful of picks
- Hield-Fox-Ben trio.
There’s never been a time in history when we look back and say that the people who were censoring free speech were the good guys.
User avatar
Stanford
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 53,693
And1: 18,942
Joined: Feb 07, 2005
Location: Parts Unknown
   

Re: The Ben Simmons Megathread - Part IV 

Post#1447 » by Stanford » Mon Jan 18, 2021 6:51 pm

76ciology wrote:3 teams that have assets and would overpay for Ben:


I like your thought process here and I hope Morey is pursuing it. But what are you suggesting comes back in terms of players?
youngcrev
RealGM
Posts: 28,786
And1: 9,699
Joined: Jun 12, 2005
Location: Philadelphia(ish)
   

Re: The Ben Simmons Megathread - Part IV 

Post#1448 » by youngcrev » Mon Jan 18, 2021 6:55 pm

76ciology wrote:3 teams that have assets and would overpay for Ben:

1.) Nuggets
- their defense is suffering. Specially now that they have to play alot of MPJ. Ben is also a super great fit for Jokic, Murray and even MPJ.
- I’d imagine they’d be willing to pay the Nets pick package for Ben.
- Murray-Barton-MPJ-Ben-Jokic

2.) Wolves
- KAT and Ben is just perfect. Wolves can trade the farm and build around Edwards, Ben and KAT.
- Edwards-Ben-KAT trio

3.) Kings
- Kings has a problematic defense with really good offense. Ben also compliments Fox and Hield. Rumor even has it that we involved the Kings that has a scenario that has Ben shipped there for Bagley and a handful of picks
- Hield-Fox-Ben trio.


What are those teams trading while keeping what you list that you consider an overpay...?
User avatar
76ciology
RealGM
Posts: 66,224
And1: 27,120
Joined: Jun 06, 2002

Re: The Ben Simmons Megathread - Part IV 

Post#1449 » by 76ciology » Mon Jan 18, 2021 7:01 pm

youngcrev wrote:
76ciology wrote:3 teams that have assets and would overpay for Ben:

1.) Nuggets
- their defense is suffering. Specially now that they have to play alot of MPJ. Ben is also a super great fit for Jokic, Murray and even MPJ.
- I’d imagine they’d be willing to pay the Nets pick package for Ben.
- Murray-Barton-MPJ-Ben-Jokic

2.) Wolves
- KAT and Ben is just perfect. Wolves can trade the farm and build around Edwards, Ben and KAT.
- Edwards-Ben-KAT trio

3.) Kings
- Kings has a problematic defense with really good offense. Ben also compliments Fox and Hield. Rumor even has it that we involved the Kings that has a scenario that has Ben shipped there for Bagley and a handful of picks
- Hield-Fox-Ben trio.


What are those teams trading while keeping what you list that you consider an overpay...?


Stanford wrote:
76ciology wrote:3 teams that have assets and would overpay for Ben:


I like your thought process here and I hope Morey is pursuing it. But what are you suggesting comes back in terms of players?


Nuggets
4 picks and 4 swaps, allows me to ship to a third team.
Cheaper Harden package.

Wolves
DLO and 2024 1st round pick (they cant trade their 2022 1sts because of GSW deal) and a pick swap <= I’d ship this to Wiz for Beal

Kings
Bagley and 2 picks and a swap <= then you can ship Bagley, TWO Sixers 1st and a Sixers pick swap to the Bulls for Lavine. So basically you gain Lavine and 3 pick swaps from the Kings lol
There’s never been a time in history when we look back and say that the people who were censoring free speech were the good guys.
User avatar
Stanford
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 53,693
And1: 18,942
Joined: Feb 07, 2005
Location: Parts Unknown
   

Re: The Ben Simmons Megathread - Part IV 

Post#1450 » by Stanford » Mon Jan 18, 2021 7:12 pm

Boy, that's a risky play.
kriss73
Analyst
Posts: 3,453
And1: 1,939
Joined: Jul 25, 2015
       

Re: The Ben Simmons Megathread - Part IV 

Post#1451 » by kriss73 » Mon Jan 18, 2021 7:37 pm

There is really no sense to trade Ben for picks and gambles in this hystorical moment of our franchise.
Adam Silver wrote:"Gross incompetence is acceptable; strategic gaming of a flawed system is not."
Negrodamus
RealGM
Posts: 26,663
And1: 17,280
Joined: Aug 05, 2004

Re: The Ben Simmons Megathread - Part IV 

Post#1452 » by Negrodamus » Mon Jan 18, 2021 7:58 pm

CJ McCollum, '24 and '26 firsts for Simmons.

I think the Blazers are about to hit a bad stretch with McCollum and Nurkic out and will want to change things up since it's obviously not working with the redundancy of McCollum and Lillard (albeit different level of scorer).

While Ben publicly has been gracious about trade rumors, I wouldn't be surprised if he's pissed and wants out.

Also, I doubt Morey wants to see Ben multiple times a year and playoffs if he sent him somewhere in the East.
User avatar
Stanford
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 53,693
And1: 18,942
Joined: Feb 07, 2005
Location: Parts Unknown
   

Re: The Ben Simmons Megathread - Part IV 

Post#1453 » by Stanford » Mon Jan 18, 2021 8:18 pm

Negrodamus wrote:CJ McCollum, '24 and '26 firsts for Simmons.

I think the Blazers are about to hit a bad stretch with McCollum and Nurkic out and will want to change things up since it's obviously not working with the redundancy of McCollum and Lillard (albeit different level of scorer).

While Ben publicly has been gracious about trade rumors, I wouldn't be surprised if he's pissed and wants out.

Also, I doubt Morey wants to see Ben multiple times a year and playoffs if he sent him somewhere in the East.


Shake starts?

Shake Milton
CJ McCollum
Danny Green
Tobias
Embiid

We'd need to flip picks and Maxey for a significant Green upgrade and then hope that there's enough on the bench
User avatar
stormi
General Manager
Posts: 8,839
And1: 9,237
Joined: Jun 04, 2019
Location: Kon FC Headquarters
     

Re: The Ben Simmons Megathread - Part IV 

Post#1454 » by stormi » Mon Jan 18, 2021 8:23 pm

CJ Mac is a pure bucket getter. Absolutely elite. I would love to get him.

Shooting Arkansas Isaiah Joe volume from 3 this season :o

5:1 turnover ratio too
User avatar
stormi
General Manager
Posts: 8,839
And1: 9,237
Joined: Jun 04, 2019
Location: Kon FC Headquarters
     

Re: The Ben Simmons Megathread - Part IV 

Post#1455 » by stormi » Mon Jan 18, 2021 8:26 pm

Stanford wrote:
Negrodamus wrote:CJ McCollum, '24 and '26 firsts for Simmons.

I think the Blazers are about to hit a bad stretch with McCollum and Nurkic out and will want to change things up since it's obviously not working with the redundancy of McCollum and Lillard (albeit different level of scorer).

While Ben publicly has been gracious about trade rumors, I wouldn't be surprised if he's pissed and wants out.

Also, I doubt Morey wants to see Ben multiple times a year and playoffs if he sent him somewhere in the East.


Shake starts?

Shake Milton
CJ McCollum
Danny Green
Tobias
Embiid

We'd need to flip picks and Maxey for a significant Green upgrade and then hope that there's enough on the bench


Couldn't we just throw a pick collage + Green + Kork or something for said upgrade. Holiday and Harden essentially went for picks only. The last time a prospect like Maxey and picks were involved in a trade was when SGA got moved for PG (+Kawhi).

What kind of upgrade did you have in mind for that package.
User avatar
Stanford
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 53,693
And1: 18,942
Joined: Feb 07, 2005
Location: Parts Unknown
   

Re: The Ben Simmons Megathread - Part IV 

Post#1456 » by Stanford » Mon Jan 18, 2021 8:29 pm

stormi wrote:What kind of upgrade did you have in mind for that package.


I just think that we'd need a star wing player to be competitive, and that would require Maxey and picks, I think.

Don't know who that player would be. I'm not good at that stuff.
Negrodamus
RealGM
Posts: 26,663
And1: 17,280
Joined: Aug 05, 2004

Re: The Ben Simmons Megathread - Part IV 

Post#1457 » by Negrodamus » Mon Jan 18, 2021 8:29 pm

Stanford wrote:
Negrodamus wrote:CJ McCollum, '24 and '26 firsts for Simmons.

I think the Blazers are about to hit a bad stretch with McCollum and Nurkic out and will want to change things up since it's obviously not working with the redundancy of McCollum and Lillard (albeit different level of scorer).

While Ben publicly has been gracious about trade rumors, I wouldn't be surprised if he's pissed and wants out.

Also, I doubt Morey wants to see Ben multiple times a year and playoffs if he sent him somewhere in the East.


Shake starts?

Shake Milton
CJ McCollum
Danny Green
Tobias
Embiid

We'd need to flip picks and Maxey for a significant Green upgrade and then hope that there's enough on the bench


I would, but Doc's son in law is on our team so it might be CJ/Curry backcourt unfortunately.
phillynative
General Manager
Posts: 9,535
And1: 3,089
Joined: Dec 13, 2014

Re: The Ben Simmons Megathread - Part IV 

Post#1458 » by phillynative » Mon Jan 18, 2021 8:34 pm

Does furkan korkmaz have any trade value?
Black Mage
Head Coach
Posts: 6,077
And1: 5,733
Joined: Feb 24, 2017
       

Re: The Ben Simmons Megathread - Part IV 

Post#1459 » by Black Mage » Mon Jan 18, 2021 8:46 pm

I wonder if Ben's recent play is indicative of Sam Cassell trying to break him down and reteach him the game/position. He definitely looks and plays just like Tobias did after Brett messed his head up.

Ben's hesitation looks like it's because he's not playing to his natural instincts (the few he did have) and is trying to figure out what he's supposed to do.

Gonna give Simmons the benefit of the doubt that part of the problem is him consciously trying to change under Sam's tutelage in response to the wake-up call of almost being traded.

I still would trade him for the right deal. I hate to say it, kinda regretting us not jumping on the rumored draft trade offers that might have brought Lamelo to the team.
phillynative
General Manager
Posts: 9,535
And1: 3,089
Joined: Dec 13, 2014

Re: The Ben Simmons Megathread - Part IV 

Post#1460 » by phillynative » Mon Jan 18, 2021 9:08 pm

phillynative wrote:Does furkan korkmaz have any trade value?


Wrong thread lol

Return to Philadelphia 76ers