They are irrelevant. Has Marc Jackson's brother's friend's friend's friend checked in?
We need a shorter moniker for him - how about MJBFFF?
Moderators: HartfordWhalers, BullyKing, sixers hoops, Foshan, Sixerscan

hookshot199 wrote:sixers hoops wrote:eyeatoma wrote:Deadline is midnight but we haven't heard anything. Is it normal for RFAs to be matched at the deadline or is it bad that nothing has happened yet?
Also
?t=m29l3koX-uLvdzaKIaPW9A&s=19
When one team adds clauses to screw over the other team, then making the other team wait as long as possible is standard. About 15 years ago, teams had way longer to decide so if someone tried to poach your free-agent, you could tie them up for a while. I’m not sure this bothers the Jazz that much.,
Except: We're talking about Morey. He should be able to sort this out over a cup of coffee. However, I do have a question. Is the offer sheet even legal? Essentially my read of it, Reed has to play a full season (seasons two and three) to determine if he's going to be paid. I think the Sixers should challenge the offer sheet for making no sense.
In other words: Match it, but a letter to both the commissioner and the player's union that you're planning to challenge the agreement that Reed might have to play two full seasons without compensation. I can't believe the league and/or the union would agree to such trickery.
We haven't seen the agreement, but it seems fishy.
sixers hoops wrote:hookshot199 wrote:sixers hoops wrote:
When one team adds clauses to screw over the other team, then making the other team wait as long as possible is standard. About 15 years ago, teams had way longer to decide so if someone tried to poach your free-agent, you could tie them up for a while. I’m not sure this bothers the Jazz that much.,
Except: We're talking about Morey. He should be able to sort this out over a cup of coffee. However, I do have a question. Is the offer sheet even legal? Essentially my read of it, Reed has to play a full season (seasons two and three) to determine if he's going to be paid. I think the Sixers should challenge the offer sheet for making no sense.
In other words: Match it, but a letter to both the commissioner and the player's union that you're planning to challenge the agreement that Reed might have to play two full seasons without compensation. I can't believe the league and/or the union would agree to such trickery.
We haven't seen the agreement, but it seems fishy.
I am not following. The first season is guaranteed. If the team holding the contract advances to the second round, then the next season becomes guaranteed. Then the same thing for the final year.
He will know after year 1 if he will be a free agent or the next season was guaranteed.
Arsenal wrote:sixers hoops wrote:hookshot199 wrote:
Except: We're talking about Morey. He should be able to sort this out over a cup of coffee. However, I do have a question. Is the offer sheet even legal? Essentially my read of it, Reed has to play a full season (seasons two and three) to determine if he's going to be paid. I think the Sixers should challenge the offer sheet for making no sense.
In other words: Match it, but a letter to both the commissioner and the player's union that you're planning to challenge the agreement that Reed might have to play two full seasons without compensation. I can't believe the league and/or the union would agree to such trickery.
We haven't seen the agreement, but it seems fishy.
I am not following. The first season is guaranteed. If the team holding the contract advances to the second round, then the next season becomes guaranteed. Then the same thing for the final year.
He will know after year 1 if he will be a free agent or the next season was guaranteed.
Plus he gets a No-Trade Clause for 1 year. So he can make sure he doesn't get traded to a bad team where Year 2 and 3 would become not guaranteed. Really slick work by that little devil Danny.


Stanford wrote:I don't understand how we got burned. Would we be saying that if Utah just offered him the same deal without the fraudulent conditions? The years and amount are completely reasonable. If anything, bball is getting burned here. If we don't match, he's on a 1 year deal on a team with a ton of players at his position.
Stanford wrote:I don't understand how we got burned. Would we be saying that if Utah just offered him the same deal without the fraudulent conditions? The years and amount are completely reasonable. If anything, bball is getting burned here. If we don't match, he's on a 1 year deal on a team with a ton of players at his position.
Murray_17 wrote:Stanford wrote:I don't understand how we got burned. Would we be saying that if Utah just offered him the same deal without the fraudulent conditions? The years and amount are completely reasonable. If anything, bball is getting burned here. If we don't match, he's on a 1 year deal on a team with a ton of players at his position.
This, Reed is barely gonna play in Utah
Stanford wrote:I don't understand how we got burned. Would we be saying that if Utah just offered him the same deal without the fraudulent conditions? The years and amount are completely reasonable. If anything, bball is getting burned here. If we don't match, he's on a 1 year deal on a team with a ton of players at his position.

sixers hoops wrote:hookshot199 wrote:sixers hoops wrote:
When one team adds clauses to screw over the other team, then making the other team wait as long as possible is standard. About 15 years ago, teams had way longer to decide so if someone tried to poach your free-agent, you could tie them up for a while. I’m not sure this bothers the Jazz that much.,
Except: We're talking about Morey. He should be able to sort this out over a cup of coffee. However, I do have a question. Is the offer sheet even legal? Essentially my read of it, Reed has to play a full season (seasons two and three) to determine if he's going to be paid. I think the Sixers should challenge the offer sheet for making no sense.
In other words: Match it, but a letter to both the commissioner and the player's union that you're planning to challenge the agreement that Reed might have to play two full seasons without compensation. I can't believe the league and/or the union would agree to such trickery.
We haven't seen the agreement, but it seems fishy.
I am not following. The first season is guaranteed. If the team holding the contract advances to the second round, then the next season becomes guaranteed. Then the same thing for the final year.
He will know after year 1 if he will be a free agent or the next season was guaranteed.
mjkvol wrote:
They are irrelevant. Has Marc Jackson's brother's friend's friend's friend checked in?
We need a shorter moniker for him - how about MJBFFF?
Mik317 wrote:they are going to hit the tax regardless as we still have 3 spots to fill
eyeatoma wrote:76ciology wrote:Were not wasting Embiid’s prime. Giannis and Jokic never had more talent than what Embiid had.
They had far better built teams that masks the deficiencies of their stars. Morey seems to know only how to build one way, get a star, and then get more stars.
Doesn't work around the margins, and then just gets has been players who are washed or former Rockets.
I'm actually shocked that we didn't get Eric Gordon.
Jailblazers7 wrote:Joel really does seem like a great guy. “I’m just happy to be his friend” is too wholesome.