ImageImageImage

Sixers Offseason Thread Part 3

Moderators: HartfordWhalers, BullyKing, sixers hoops, Foshan, Sixerscan

User avatar
mjkvol
Head Coach
Posts: 6,827
And1: 6,499
Joined: Apr 13, 2019

Re: Sixers Offseason Thread Part 3 

Post#1521 » by mjkvol » Sun Jul 9, 2023 10:15 pm

Arsenal wrote:Oh no, the vinsider has spoken!

Read on Twitter


Dueling insiders!!!

Read on Twitter


They are irrelevant. Has Marc Jackson's brother's friend's friend's friend checked in?

We need a shorter moniker for him - how about MJBFFF?
"Most people do not really want freedom, because freedom involves responsibility, and most people are frightened of responsibility." - Sigmund Freud
sixers hoops
Senior Mod - 76ers
Senior Mod - 76ers
Posts: 10,081
And1: 3,529
Joined: Jun 28, 2002

Re: Sixers Offseason Thread Part 3 

Post#1522 » by sixers hoops » Sun Jul 9, 2023 10:20 pm

hookshot199 wrote:
sixers hoops wrote:
eyeatoma wrote:Deadline is midnight but we haven't heard anything. Is it normal for RFAs to be matched at the deadline or is it bad that nothing has happened yet?


Also

Read on Twitter
?t=m29l3koX-uLvdzaKIaPW9A&s=19


When one team adds clauses to screw over the other team, then making the other team wait as long as possible is standard. About 15 years ago, teams had way longer to decide so if someone tried to poach your free-agent, you could tie them up for a while. I’m not sure this bothers the Jazz that much.,


Except: We're talking about Morey. He should be able to sort this out over a cup of coffee. However, I do have a question. Is the offer sheet even legal? Essentially my read of it, Reed has to play a full season (seasons two and three) to determine if he's going to be paid. I think the Sixers should challenge the offer sheet for making no sense.

In other words: Match it, but a letter to both the commissioner and the player's union that you're planning to challenge the agreement that Reed might have to play two full seasons without compensation. I can't believe the league and/or the union would agree to such trickery.

We haven't seen the agreement, but it seems fishy.


I am not following. The first season is guaranteed. If the team holding the contract advances to the second round, then the next season becomes guaranteed. Then the same thing for the final year.

He will know after year 1 if he will be a free agent or the next season was guaranteed.
User avatar
Arsenal
RealGM
Posts: 17,086
And1: 11,982
Joined: Jun 05, 2002
Location: Arlington, VA
 

Re: Sixers Offseason Thread Part 3 

Post#1523 » by Arsenal » Sun Jul 9, 2023 10:23 pm

sixers hoops wrote:
hookshot199 wrote:
sixers hoops wrote:
When one team adds clauses to screw over the other team, then making the other team wait as long as possible is standard. About 15 years ago, teams had way longer to decide so if someone tried to poach your free-agent, you could tie them up for a while. I’m not sure this bothers the Jazz that much.,


Except: We're talking about Morey. He should be able to sort this out over a cup of coffee. However, I do have a question. Is the offer sheet even legal? Essentially my read of it, Reed has to play a full season (seasons two and three) to determine if he's going to be paid. I think the Sixers should challenge the offer sheet for making no sense.

In other words: Match it, but a letter to both the commissioner and the player's union that you're planning to challenge the agreement that Reed might have to play two full seasons without compensation. I can't believe the league and/or the union would agree to such trickery.

We haven't seen the agreement, but it seems fishy.


I am not following. The first season is guaranteed. If the team holding the contract advances to the second round, then the next season becomes guaranteed. Then the same thing for the final year.

He will know after year 1 if he will be a free agent or the next season was guaranteed.


Plus he gets a No-Trade Clause for 1 year. So he can make sure he doesn't get traded to a bad team where Year 2 and 3 would become not guaranteed. Really slick work by that little devil Danny.
spikeslovechild
RealGM
Posts: 12,843
And1: 6,198
Joined: Dec 16, 2013
Location: Right here waiting for you

Re: Sixers Offseason Thread Part 3 

Post#1524 » by spikeslovechild » Sun Jul 9, 2023 10:28 pm

Arsenal wrote:
sixers hoops wrote:
hookshot199 wrote:
Except: We're talking about Morey. He should be able to sort this out over a cup of coffee. However, I do have a question. Is the offer sheet even legal? Essentially my read of it, Reed has to play a full season (seasons two and three) to determine if he's going to be paid. I think the Sixers should challenge the offer sheet for making no sense.

In other words: Match it, but a letter to both the commissioner and the player's union that you're planning to challenge the agreement that Reed might have to play two full seasons without compensation. I can't believe the league and/or the union would agree to such trickery.

We haven't seen the agreement, but it seems fishy.


I am not following. The first season is guaranteed. If the team holding the contract advances to the second round, then the next season becomes guaranteed. Then the same thing for the final year.

He will know after year 1 if he will be a free agent or the next season was guaranteed.


Plus he gets a No-Trade Clause for 1 year. So he can make sure he doesn't get traded to a bad team where Year 2 and 3 would become not guaranteed. Really slick work by that little devil Danny.


We really should have either signed him or worked out a sign-and-trade with a team.

We waited and got burned but it's ridiculous that these bizarre terms are allowed in his contract to begin with. The NFL did away with that nonsense decades ago
User avatar
Stanford
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 53,636
And1: 18,892
Joined: Feb 07, 2005
Location: Parts Unknown
   

Re: Sixers Offseason Thread Part 3 

Post#1525 » by Stanford » Sun Jul 9, 2023 10:35 pm

I don't understand how we got burned. Would we be saying that if Utah just offered him the same deal without the fraudulent conditions? The years and amount are completely reasonable. If anything, bball is getting burned here. If we don't match, he's on a 1 year deal on a team with a ton of players at his position.
sixers hoops
Senior Mod - 76ers
Senior Mod - 76ers
Posts: 10,081
And1: 3,529
Joined: Jun 28, 2002

Re: Sixers Offseason Thread Part 3 

Post#1526 » by sixers hoops » Sun Jul 9, 2023 10:45 pm

Stanford wrote:I don't understand how we got burned. Would we be saying that if Utah just offered him the same deal without the fraudulent conditions? The years and amount are completely reasonable. If anything, bball is getting burned here. If we don't match, he's on a 1 year deal on a team with a ton of players at his position.


We only got burned because we wanted him to take the qualifying offer so Josh Harris doesn’t have to pay the tax. Otherwise, it’s not a huge deal.
Murray_17
RealGM
Posts: 13,903
And1: 14,086
Joined: Mar 20, 2020
   

Re: Sixers Offseason Thread Part 3 

Post#1527 » by Murray_17 » Sun Jul 9, 2023 10:57 pm

Stanford wrote:I don't understand how we got burned. Would we be saying that if Utah just offered him the same deal without the fraudulent conditions? The years and amount are completely reasonable. If anything, bball is getting burned here. If we don't match, he's on a 1 year deal on a team with a ton of players at his position.



This, Reed is barely gonna play in Utah
User avatar
Embiid P
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,032
And1: 2,274
Joined: Nov 07, 2013
     

Re: Sixers Offseason Thread Part 3 

Post#1528 » by Embiid P » Sun Jul 9, 2023 11:40 pm

I fear the Sixers have once again become the red-headed stepchild of their owner (much like they were vs. the Flyers with Snider) with Harris purchasing the Commanders. If winning becomes secondary to avoiding the luxury tax, then it's clear that his priorities lie elsewhere and thus needs to sell ASAP.
Jhawk03
Rookie
Posts: 1,070
And1: 386
Joined: May 23, 2003
Location: Time for a new contract.......

Re: Sixers Offseason Thread Part 3 

Post#1529 » by Jhawk03 » Sun Jul 9, 2023 11:41 pm

Yikes, I try to take a little break and find Danny boy out here showin his ass.

Reed is as good as gone, mainly because matching that contract with that language in it would make Morey look weak (even before the luxury tax complications). Can't blame Danny cuz scumbag gonna scumbag, my concern is does Morey not have enough moles to prevent a bitch move like this? Jazz have no use for Paul, like zero, nothing about this makes any sense but w/e so long Bball.
mg
General Manager
Posts: 8,800
And1: 4,641
Joined: Jun 12, 2003

Re: Sixers Offseason Thread Part 3 

Post#1530 » by mg » Sun Jul 9, 2023 11:50 pm

Murray_17 wrote:
Stanford wrote:I don't understand how we got burned. Would we be saying that if Utah just offered him the same deal without the fraudulent conditions? The years and amount are completely reasonable. If anything, bball is getting burned here. If we don't match, he's on a 1 year deal on a team with a ton of players at his position.



This, Reed is barely gonna play in Utah


He's just another tradeable asset to add to Ainge's warchest.

I've seen this movie before..
DCasey91
General Manager
Posts: 9,530
And1: 5,772
Joined: Dec 15, 2020
   

Re: Sixers Offseason Thread Part 3 

Post#1531 » by DCasey91 » Mon Jul 10, 2023 1:13 am

Stanford wrote:I don't understand how we got burned. Would we be saying that if Utah just offered him the same deal without the fraudulent conditions? The years and amount are completely reasonable. If anything, bball is getting burned here. If we don't match, he's on a 1 year deal on a team with a ton of players at his position.


Anyone with half a brain would jump and go straight to the airport for a double of their salary (most likely more) even if one year. It’s guaranteed $$$

It’s actually more than triple because the qualifying is around the 2.3 ballpark. So he’s going to make a lot more than two seasons with us. So no dramas take the money and run.

My bet is the Sixers had inside info thus signing Bamba etc to cover their tracks. Probably had an offer sheet from the Sixers, Reeds agent goes we’ll test the waters. Happens all the time

We didn’t do him any favours on pumping up his value for trading for picks/assets. Had good netrtg, box +- in the reg season and in the playoffs. Blame Doc the old cloud yelling man

Danny just rolled us up and smoked it good and proper lol
Li WenWen is the GOAT
FireMorey
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,740
And1: 4,532
Joined: Mar 19, 2018
   

Re: Sixers Offseason Thread Part 3 

Post#1532 » by FireMorey » Mon Jul 10, 2023 1:30 am

Read on Twitter
User avatar
Ben
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 26,799
And1: 2,937
Joined: Feb 09, 2006

Re: Sixers Offseason Thread Part 3 

Post#1533 » by Ben » Mon Jul 10, 2023 1:35 am

Reed should be the Sixers' starting 4 this year. Tobi/ Reed/ Embiid frontcourt. The Jazz's offered salary is peanuts for a starting PF. If Morey doesn't recognize that, or if his hands are tied by ownership because of the luxury tax, it'll be disgusting.
Jailblazers7
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,458
And1: 6,234
Joined: Oct 23, 2017
     

Re: Sixers Offseason Thread Part 3 

Post#1534 » by Jailblazers7 » Mon Jul 10, 2023 1:39 am

Joel really does seem like a great guy. “I’m just happy to be his friend” is too wholesome.
hookshot199
Analyst
Posts: 3,261
And1: 723
Joined: Jun 16, 2014
   

Re: Sixers Offseason Thread Part 3 

Post#1535 » by hookshot199 » Mon Jul 10, 2023 1:39 am

sixers hoops wrote:
hookshot199 wrote:
sixers hoops wrote:
When one team adds clauses to screw over the other team, then making the other team wait as long as possible is standard. About 15 years ago, teams had way longer to decide so if someone tried to poach your free-agent, you could tie them up for a while. I’m not sure this bothers the Jazz that much.,


Except: We're talking about Morey. He should be able to sort this out over a cup of coffee. However, I do have a question. Is the offer sheet even legal? Essentially my read of it, Reed has to play a full season (seasons two and three) to determine if he's going to be paid. I think the Sixers should challenge the offer sheet for making no sense.

In other words: Match it, but a letter to both the commissioner and the player's union that you're planning to challenge the agreement that Reed might have to play two full seasons without compensation. I can't believe the league and/or the union would agree to such trickery.

We haven't seen the agreement, but it seems fishy.


I am not following. The first season is guaranteed. If the team holding the contract advances to the second round, then the next season becomes guaranteed. Then the same thing for the final year.

He will know after year 1 if he will be a free agent or the next season was guaranteed.


Thank you for clarifying. So effectively it's a one-year contract. I'm not a lawyer, but I would still match the offer with a legal challenge to the validity of the year two and year three provisions. Call Ainge out. One basic question because precedent is important: Is this a first-time-ever arrangement of this sort? Embarrass Ainge, Silver and the players' association if they support this sham. Just a thought.
User avatar
Mik317
RealGM
Posts: 41,315
And1: 19,948
Joined: May 31, 2005
Location: In Spain...without the S
       

Re: Sixers Offseason Thread Part 3 

Post#1536 » by Mik317 » Mon Jul 10, 2023 1:40 am

they are going to hit the tax regardless as we still have 3 spots to fill
#NeverGonnaBeGood
GoSixersBro
Head Coach
Posts: 7,158
And1: 2,776
Joined: May 26, 2010
   

Re: Sixers Offseason Thread Part 3 

Post#1537 » by GoSixersBro » Mon Jul 10, 2023 1:45 am

mjkvol wrote:
Arsenal wrote:Oh no, the vinsider has spoken!

Read on Twitter


Dueling insiders!!!

Read on Twitter


They are irrelevant. Has Marc Jackson's brother's friend's friend's friend checked in?

We need a shorter moniker for him - how about MJBFFF?


My friend's friend who is friends with MJ's brother (MFFWFWMJB) is batting 1000 (1/1) so don't be lumping him in with Twitter bums please.
Here Lies The Process
May 13, 2013 - April 6, 2016
youngcrev
RealGM
Posts: 28,784
And1: 9,698
Joined: Jun 12, 2005
Location: Philadelphia(ish)
   

Re: Sixers Offseason Thread Part 3 

Post#1538 » by youngcrev » Mon Jul 10, 2023 1:48 am

Mik317 wrote:they are going to hit the tax regardless as we still have 3 spots to fill


That's where the Furkan trade comes in...
User avatar
76ciology
RealGM
Posts: 65,964
And1: 26,933
Joined: Jun 06, 2002

Re: Sixers Offseason Thread Part 3 

Post#1539 » by 76ciology » Mon Jul 10, 2023 2:15 am

eyeatoma wrote:
76ciology wrote:Were not wasting Embiid’s prime. Giannis and Jokic never had more talent than what Embiid had.



They had far better built teams that masks the deficiencies of their stars. Morey seems to know only how to build one way, get a star, and then get more stars.

Doesn't work around the margins, and then just gets has been players who are washed or former Rockets.

I'm actually shocked that we didn't get Eric Gordon.


I think you need to play more speed or ball movement if you want to play without overloaded top tier stars, which is contrary to an Embiid centric team. But im giving Nurse a chance to unlock this problem.
There’s never been a time in history when we look back and say that the people who were censoring free speech were the good guys.
Negrodamus
RealGM
Posts: 26,583
And1: 17,166
Joined: Aug 05, 2004

Re: Sixers Offseason Thread Part 3 

Post#1540 » by Negrodamus » Mon Jul 10, 2023 2:19 am

Jailblazers7 wrote:Joel really does seem like a great guy. “I’m just happy to be his friend” is too wholesome.


That was my second thought he I heard him say that...

... my first was "this'll probably be turned into a meme".

Return to Philadelphia 76ers