Kolkmania wrote:GutUNC wrote:Kolkmania wrote:Obviously this would have to wait until December 15th, but I would certainly consider the following:
PHI: Simmons and Green
MIN: Russell, Beasley and McDaniels
Haven't thought long enough about who will receive draft compensation and hwo much, perhaps we have to add Milton. That said, I like the general framework.
Timberwolves would maintain their core with Towns and Edwards and add Simmons and Green for defensive purposes.
I don't think it is realistic that the Sixers will acquire a star anytime soon. Instead we acquire flexibility, some youth, while maintaining a roster that can compete within the East.
Russell is obviously far from a star, but I think he has a role at the Sixers as a playmaker and somebody who has the green light with the ball in his hands. Beasley and McDaniels are decent assets who can potentially develop into more.
Acquiring DeAngelo Russell and his terrible contract is the opposite of flexibility. Short term salary filler and additional picks - that's flexibility.
Disagree. Short term salary fillers will lead to nothing, since the Embiid and Harris contracts will prevent you from signing FA's anyway.
The value of the picks will determine your flexibility. However, they won't net you a superstar unless you acquire multiple top-5 picks. None of the teams that will trade for Simmons will give you that.
Only path to a superstar for Simmons is to trade him for picks and also hand over our entire draft capital. But I'd argue that's also possible when you have multiple value contracts. You can always trade those assets for additional draft picks, similar to what the Nets did in the Harden trade.
It leads you away from having D'Angelo Russell's negative value game and untradeable contract on your roster, so that's a positive for me. I'd rather have the flexibility for Daryl to work the market with the expirings, even if the idea of a max free agent is unlikely. He's that bad.



























