ImageImageImage

Markelle Fultz Discussion

Moderators: BullyKing, HartfordWhalers, sixers hoops, Foshan, Sixerscan

Chris76
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,969
And1: 318
Joined: May 06, 2017
   

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion 

Post#781 » by Chris76 » Tue Jul 18, 2017 5:23 am

Negrodamus wrote:
LloydFree wrote:
Negrodamus wrote:
I wouldn't either, but he's the level Fultz should attain. I think the ceiling can be a Harden as they have similar length and game type (poor defenders out of college, 6'4ish with 6'10+ wingspan). I don't see him becoming Harden, but somewhere in the middle between McCollum and Harden is what I'm hopeful for.

If I thought Fultz resembled anything closes to Harden, he'd be worth three top 5 picks. He isn't nearly as skilled as Harden was at the same stage. Fultz's​ handle is below average for a starting NBA PG, and while he is a good passer, he doesn't have close to the creativity or awareness of Harden. Harden is an NBA anomaly. Every slow 6'4 player isn't going to become James Harden. Harden's skill level is on a different planet.

... And there is a Grand canyon sized gap in skill and awareness between CJ McCollum and Harden, too.


I don't know what point is being hammered home here. I didn't say I expected him to be Harden, I don't think Harden and McCollum are close in skill level, I don't think every 6'4 prospect is going to be Jame Harden (although if there ever was going to be one, they'd probably be the first pick in the draft...).

And I said I'm hoping Fultz can land somewhere in between that Harden and McCollum threshold. If Harden is "worth three top five picks" and McCollum is worth none, Fultz will land slightly in the middle with one and a half (don't think Lakers will be a top five pick next year; questionable if the Kings will still be this bad the year following) valuation and we can all be content, no?


Alonzo looks like a very good player, however he may have trouble with good defenders. If players like Fox and other good defensive guards can crowd Alonzo, he may struggle with shooting and assists. Anyway, Fultz should be able to deal with good defensive PGs, he can make contested shots. He is more like a mini Kobe, he should be able to takeover a game, when needed.
LongLiveHinkie
RealGM
Posts: 14,263
And1: 3,963
Joined: May 04, 2005

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion 

Post#782 » by LongLiveHinkie » Tue Jul 18, 2017 5:42 am

Calling Fultz's handle "below average for a starting PG" is just the latest in a long line of bad takes here of late. Or maybe I should say misinformation. His handle is one of his best attributes.
eyeatoma
RealGM
Posts: 29,859
And1: 13,153
Joined: Feb 25, 2005
     

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion 

Post#783 » by eyeatoma » Tue Jul 18, 2017 5:57 am

Unbreakable99 wrote:
d-rose [heroes] wrote:Shoulda picked Lonzo. He was clearly the better prospect


Agreed.


Really getting tired of your ad nauseum opinions...
User avatar
Misteclipse
Junior
Posts: 478
And1: 375
Joined: Oct 07, 2009

Re: RE: Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion 

Post#784 » by Misteclipse » Tue Jul 18, 2017 9:00 am

eyeatoma wrote:
Unbreakable99 wrote:
d-rose [heroes] wrote:Shoulda picked Lonzo. He was clearly the better prospect


Agreed.


Really getting tired of your ad nauseum opinions...

He'll disappear in 6 months when Ball is shooting 35% from the field and turning the ball over en route to many many Lakers losses. Just gotta deal with it for now unfortunately.

Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk
Simmons25
Analyst
Posts: 3,166
And1: 2,235
Joined: Sep 27, 2016

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion 

Post#785 » by Simmons25 » Tue Jul 18, 2017 11:24 am

d-rose [heroes] wrote:Shoulda picked Lonzo. He was clearly the better prospect


Yes... because drafting a guy that shoots 19% from 3 whilst chucking up at a rate that would make JR Smith blush... for a team that badly needs outside shooting was a MASSIVE mistake :lol:
LordCovington33
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,383
And1: 5,223
Joined: Nov 15, 2016
   

Re: RE: Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion 

Post#786 » by LordCovington33 » Tue Jul 18, 2017 1:34 pm

Misteclipse wrote:
eyeatoma wrote:
Unbreakable99 wrote:
Agreed.


Really getting tired of your ad nauseum opinions...

He'll disappear in 6 months when Ball is shooting 35% from the field and turning the ball over en route to many many Lakers losses. Just gotta deal with it for now unfortunately.

Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk


It is not like he is becoming more convincing the more times he repeats the same argument. :lol:
User avatar
Sixersftw
RealGM
Posts: 19,199
And1: 9,491
Joined: Dec 23, 2006
Location: Shoot a 3 you coward
       

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion 

Post#787 » by Sixersftw » Tue Jul 18, 2017 1:39 pm

He just agreed. Its not a huge deal. It would be one thing if it was purely a summer league hot take but he's always preferred Lonzo.
They say an analytics man doesn't have a heart, but I ran the numbers and nothing can be further from the truth - Sam Hinkie probably
Chris76
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,969
And1: 318
Joined: May 06, 2017
   

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion 

Post#788 » by Chris76 » Tue Jul 18, 2017 1:56 pm

LongLiveHinkie wrote:Calling Fultz's handle "below average for a starting PG" is just the latest in a long line of bad takes here of late. Or maybe I should say misinformation. His handle is one of his best attributes.


I agree his handle is good. He will make better decisions with the starters. Also, I like his hesitation moves and he finishes thru contact. Although, Alonzo is going to be a great distributor, I think he will struggle against taller and stronger guards. Anyway, Fultz should have a great year!
eagereyez
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,991
And1: 4,462
Joined: May 05, 2012
   

Re: RE: Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion 

Post#789 » by eagereyez » Tue Jul 18, 2017 2:14 pm

Simmons25 wrote:
d-rose [heroes] wrote:Shoulda picked Lonzo. He was clearly the better prospect


Yes... because drafting a guy that shoots 19% from 3 whilst chucking up at a rate that would make JR Smith blush... for a team that badly needs outside shooting was a MASSIVE mistake :lol:

"Summer League stats don't matter, unless they fit my narrative."
LongLiveHinkie
RealGM
Posts: 14,263
And1: 3,963
Joined: May 04, 2005

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion 

Post#790 » by LongLiveHinkie » Tue Jul 18, 2017 5:47 pm

Chris76 wrote:
LongLiveHinkie wrote:Calling Fultz's handle "below average for a starting PG" is just the latest in a long line of bad takes here of late. Or maybe I should say misinformation. His handle is one of his best attributes.


I agree his handle is good. He will make better decisions with the starters. Also, I like his hesitation moves and he finishes thru contact. Although, Alonzo is going to be a great distributor, I think he will struggle against taller and stronger guards. Anyway, Fultz should have a great year!


His ability to create his own shot is his best attribute. Can't do that without being a really good ball handler. He is really crafty with the ball, watching him split double teams is pure eye candy. He's always in control. Even has a nasty crossover that he whips out from time to time too. Anyone who says he's a below average ball handler is very uneducated on all things Markelle Fultz.
User avatar
Mik317
RealGM
Posts: 41,284
And1: 19,915
Joined: May 31, 2005
Location: In Spain...without the S
       

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion 

Post#791 » by Mik317 » Tue Jul 18, 2017 6:06 pm

I think Fultz ability to get his own shot is more due to his footwork/balance than his handle. Those spins for example take great balance and footwork to do as often as he does. His actual handle is a bit loose (not bad of course) and could use some tightening up....luckily he will have a release valve in Simmons and others until he does.
#NeverGonnaBeGood
User avatar
JojoSlimbiid
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,317
And1: 2,239
Joined: Dec 03, 2016
   

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion 

Post#792 » by JojoSlimbiid » Tue Jul 18, 2017 6:25 pm

If his handles are below average I wonder what some of the other drafted players handles are on that scale.
User avatar
sixerswillrule
RealGM
Posts: 16,683
And1: 3,625
Joined: Jul 24, 2003
Location: Disappointment

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion 

Post#793 » by sixerswillrule » Tue Jul 18, 2017 6:33 pm

It will be a unique situation for a rookie PG since Fultz and Simmons will have each other to fall back on. Neither will have as much on their shoulders as they would otherwise. Plus having a low post option in Embiid and vets like Redick and Covington will help a lot.
LongLiveHinkie
RealGM
Posts: 14,263
And1: 3,963
Joined: May 04, 2005

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion 

Post#794 » by LongLiveHinkie » Tue Jul 18, 2017 8:58 pm

Mik317 wrote:I think Fultz ability to get his own shot is more due to his footwork/balance than his handle. Those spins for example take great balance and footwork to do as often as he does. His actual handle is a bit loose (not bad of course) and could use some tightening up....luckily he will have a release valve in Simmons and others until he does.


I think it's a combination of everything. His handles are not as good as DSJ's. Smith's are the best in the draft class by a wide margin. He's a ridiculous ball handler. But outside of him, Fultz is right there atop the draft class. The only knocks on him are sometimes dribbling it a little high or away from his body, but he's a natural at it, has great moves and always feels under control. You can tell he's very coordinated. He's going to be a fine ball handler in the NBA and will only get better.
Xpressure
Sophomore
Posts: 151
And1: 90
Joined: Jun 03, 2012
 

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion 

Post#795 » by Xpressure » Tue Jul 18, 2017 9:17 pm

You guys maybe tired hearing about Ball, but what irks me more actually are Mavs fans proclaiming that DSJ is a better player than Fultz that should've gone 1 or 2 :lol: :banghead: :banghead:
LongLiveHinkie
RealGM
Posts: 14,263
And1: 3,963
Joined: May 04, 2005

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion 

Post#796 » by LongLiveHinkie » Tue Jul 18, 2017 9:29 pm

Who gives a ****, let the regular season do the talking.
Unbreakable99
General Manager
Posts: 8,752
And1: 3,993
Joined: Jul 04, 2014

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion 

Post#797 » by Unbreakable99 » Tue Jul 18, 2017 10:05 pm

Xpressure wrote:You guys maybe tired hearing about Ball, but what irks me more actually are Mavs fans proclaiming that DSJ is a better player than Fultz that should've gone 1 or 2 :lol: :banghead: :banghead:


Mavs fans may be right. DSJ is more explosive than Fultz. His game should flourish in the NBA. I wouldn't say it's outlandish for people to expect DSJ to be the better player.
User avatar
cksdayoff
RealGM
Posts: 13,331
And1: 3,639
Joined: Jun 21, 2010

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion 

Post#798 » by cksdayoff » Tue Jul 18, 2017 10:08 pm

markelle's the best prospect in the draft
#failforfultz
Unbreakable99
General Manager
Posts: 8,752
And1: 3,993
Joined: Jul 04, 2014

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion 

Post#799 » by Unbreakable99 » Tue Jul 18, 2017 10:10 pm

cksdayoff wrote:markelle's the best prospect in the draft


Let's hope. I hope you're right.
XtremeDunkz
General Manager
Posts: 8,508
And1: 7,058
Joined: Mar 08, 2012
       

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion 

Post#800 » by XtremeDunkz » Tue Jul 18, 2017 10:10 pm

Unbreakable99 wrote:
Xpressure wrote:You guys maybe tired hearing about Ball, but what irks me more actually are Mavs fans proclaiming that DSJ is a better player than Fultz that should've gone 1 or 2 :lol: :banghead: :banghead:


Mavs fans may be right. DSJ is more explosive than Fultz. His game should flourish in the NBA. I wouldn't say it's outlandish for people to expect DSJ to be the better player.


It's gonna be a long 3 months.
10/27/16
Nemesis21 wrote:It is absolutely hilarious hearing people still say Embiid has superstar potential.The guy is one injury away from being Greg Oden.:lol: Except Oden manged to play over 100 games in the NBA, I don't think Embiid will play more.

Return to Philadelphia 76ers