Negrodamus wrote:LloydFree wrote:Negrodamus wrote:
I wouldn't either, but he's the level Fultz should attain. I think the ceiling can be a Harden as they have similar length and game type (poor defenders out of college, 6'4ish with 6'10+ wingspan). I don't see him becoming Harden, but somewhere in the middle between McCollum and Harden is what I'm hopeful for.
If I thought Fultz resembled anything closes to Harden, he'd be worth three top 5 picks. He isn't nearly as skilled as Harden was at the same stage. Fultz's handle is below average for a starting NBA PG, and while he is a good passer, he doesn't have close to the creativity or awareness of Harden. Harden is an NBA anomaly. Every slow 6'4 player isn't going to become James Harden. Harden's skill level is on a different planet.
... And there is a Grand canyon sized gap in skill and awareness between CJ McCollum and Harden, too.
I don't know what point is being hammered home here. I didn't say I expected him to be Harden, I don't think Harden and McCollum are close in skill level, I don't think every 6'4 prospect is going to be Jame Harden (although if there ever was going to be one, they'd probably be the first pick in the draft...).
And I said I'm hoping Fultz can land somewhere in between that Harden and McCollum threshold. If Harden is "worth three top five picks" and McCollum is worth none, Fultz will land slightly in the middle with one and a half (don't think Lakers will be a top five pick next year; questionable if the Kings will still be this bad the year following) valuation and we can all be content, no?
Alonzo looks like a very good player, however he may have trouble with good defenders. If players like Fox and other good defensive guards can crowd Alonzo, he may struggle with shooting and assists. Anyway, Fultz should be able to deal with good defensive PGs, he can make contested shots. He is more like a mini Kobe, he should be able to takeover a game, when needed.