TTP wrote:Chris76 wrote:TTP wrote:
Were you living at the International Space Station the last two years or something?
Okafor has been given nearly two years worth of chances. Okafor has been awful with all of his chances. We tried Embiid and Okafor together and it was a predictable disaster.
Give Okafor a chance
Team that wants to win
Pick one.
Okafor played with terrible guards, TJ,Sergio, and others were bad at defense, the whole team was bad, too judge him on those games is unfair. I admit he looked bad when he stopped trying for whatever reason. If, Okafor turns it around, there's rumors of him getting in better shape, he can be a valuable asset. Why throw that away for peanuts, when he could prove in a few games if he fits or not. Anyway, Okafor played well in a few games, he showed he can score when not being doubled. Also, the space station has League Pass.
More like the guards played with a terrible center in Okafor. You use those guards as a constant to compare lineups involving Okafor and Embiid/Noel/Holmes/Long. Why are the others succeeding with the same guards?
Lol @ the bolded. So we should just ignore two years of evidence for every player on the roster because the team was bad?
I've already told you why but I can't make you understand it. Because we need to make a decision on Okafor's option in October, and I'm skeptical that he will continue to be an asset if we pick up his 4th year option. I also don't think he's a valuable asset now and don't think he's worth the roster spot he'd be taking. You want to keep him on the off chance that he turns into a non-rebounding version of Enes Kanter, a player that can't be on the court vs the best teams in the league?
Yeah, moving Embiid to accommodate anybody, especially Okafor, would be negligent. Okafor's offense isn't very good. We want the ball in Embiid, Simmons, and likely Fultz' hands. He looked horrible next to Embiid, and he can't protect the rim.