Look, VC might not be that efficient yet but there is no reason for him not to play/start:
VC as a SUN: 17.5pts, 4.5reb, 2.0ast, 0.8stl, 45,5% FG and 36,4 % from downtown
JR as a SUN: 19.3pts, 4.4reb, 1.4ast, 1.1stl, 47,0% FG and 41,9 % from downtown
Imo he is doing pretty good and I don't like VC
Nash's ideal PnR partner?
Moderators: bwgood77, Qwigglez, lilfishi22
Re: Nash's ideal PnR partner?
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,621
- And1: 561
- Joined: Feb 01, 2010
- Location: Sweden
Re: Nash's ideal PnR partner?
- lilfishi22
- Forum Mod - Suns
- Posts: 36,206
- And1: 24,563
- Joined: Oct 16, 2007
- Location: Australia
Re: Nash's ideal PnR partner?
Shooting % and assist rates should increase over time as he gets used to the system.
Re: Nash's ideal PnR partner?
-
- Sophomore
- Posts: 226
- And1: 69
- Joined: Dec 01, 2008
- Location: Australia
Re: Nash's ideal PnR partner?
RunDogGun wrote:The only offensive problem with Warrick is if he doesn't dunk it, he just throws it at the basket as hard as he dunks it. There isn't a touch there.
+1000000000000000000000000
The guy has no finesse game at all and no touch whatsoever under the basket. He just flies in arm fully outstretched trying to dunk and when he can't, he just kind of lets the ball go and hopes for the best. Plus his midrange j is very unreliable...he's airballed quite a few of those this season.
The dunk is all he has going for him.
Still I agree he should get some more mins as having any p 'n r play (even if it's nowhere near as effective as Nash/STAT was) is crucial to the Suns offense.
Re: Nash's ideal PnR partner?
- Wannabe MEP
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,152
- And1: 1,852
- Joined: Sep 29, 2010
- Location: Idaho
-
Re: Nash's ideal PnR partner?
visions wrote:RunDogGun wrote:The only offensive problem with Warrick is if he doesn't dunk it, he just throws it at the basket as hard as he dunks it. There isn't a touch there.
+1000000000000000000000000
The guy has no finesse game at all and no touch whatsoever under the basket. He just flies in arm fully outstretched trying to dunk and when he can't, he just kind of lets the ball go and hopes for the best. Plus his midrange j is very unreliable...he's airballed quite a few of those this season.
The dunk is all he has going for him.
Still I agree he should get some more mins as having any p 'n r play (even if it's nowhere near as effective as Nash/STAT was) is crucial to the Suns offense.
However he does it, his scoring efficiency is very, very good.
But I'm wondering about Childress. Would he be just as effective as Warrick? He doesn't give up much size to Warrick, he dunks aggressively, he moves athletically, he gets fouled a lot, and he has more finishing finesse.
Re: Nash's ideal PnR partner?
- Wannabe MEP
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,152
- And1: 1,852
- Joined: Sep 29, 2010
- Location: Idaho
-
Re: Nash's ideal PnR partner?
gleonard1 wrote:http://valleyofthesuns.com/2011/01/10/hakim-warrick-is-the-answer-to-phoenixs-offensive-woes/
Interesting article on Hak-attack.
That is really interesting.
Re: Nash's ideal PnR partner?
- JohnVancouver
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,016
- And1: 236
- Joined: Jun 18, 2007
- Location: Vancouver, BC
Re: Nash's ideal PnR partner?
Los Soles wrote: I'm wondering about Childress. Would he be just as effective as Warrick? He doesn't give up much size to Warrick, he dunks aggressively, he moves athletically, he gets fouled a lot, and he has more finishing finesse.
and he plays defense and rebounds ....
so, to sum up, he does everything that Warrick does and also gives us what Warrick doesn't - play the guy
"Deng and Mozgov was some 1980s Clippers sh*t. So, so dumb" - Sedale Threatt
"If you can't get banned for threatening to rape a mod, what can you get banned for?" Jigga_Man/2013
"Everybody love Everybody." - Jackie Moon
"If you can't get banned for threatening to rape a mod, what can you get banned for?" Jigga_Man/2013
"Everybody love Everybody." - Jackie Moon