Moderators: bwgood77, Qwigglez, lilfishi22
grumpysaddle wrote:Kerrsed wrote:So we just beat the top defensive team in the league.....twice.
With defense. Amazing what effort can get you.
KLEON wrote:people acting like its a game 7 in the NBA finals
SuperSunsFan wrote:AtheJ415 wrote:Calvin Klein wrote:
Well...he did sign that contract so...it's not like anybody was forcing him to do it.
Not only that, but it's beyond revisionist history. Bledsoe was ALL ABOUT playing for Bob so long as Bob gave him a new, more expensive contract. Dude did not give a damn about playing for a winner. He wanted to get PAID. And there's nothing wrong with that, but don't then sit there and claim he just wanted to win when he was fully ready to sign on here for even MORE years.
this is the problem of living in divisive world everyone views things black and white, things usually is somewhere in the middle. Bledsoe is a greedy s**t but still doesn't change the fact that he wanted to leave because Suns was a dumpster fire because he was in a contract year and being on a winning team making a run for the playoff was important for him to showcase suitors that he could play winning basketball not just a player putting up empty stat and not to mention the exposure of being on a winning team in addition to many other factors like uncertainty with Bob trying to lowball him once again. Gee this just because he signed a contract with Sarver means he must put up with his sh*ttiness and can't complain about Bob being a sh**ty owner is the true revisionist, since i remember they were already having badblood during the last negotiation, we didn't know Bob was this bad until the time and many mistakes have cemented our views on him, Bledsoe might be willing to play for a lousy owner for a outrageously lucrative contract, but not to the extent of Bob when Bob's incompetence as a nba owner is unprecedentedly legendary.
bwgood77 wrote:I wonder if we are the only team to sweep the Bucks.
Jdiddy701 wrote:If Ayton turns the corner, we can thank Jackson and Booker. Ayton has said multiple times those two are the ones pushing him. I love that Booker said that 16 and 10 is cool but 30 and 20 is better. Now if Booker can pass him the ball more, we’d be okay! One of the last plays in last night’s game between Booker and Ayton was one of my favorite moments in a long time.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
By the 53-percentage-point difference in record, this is on pace to be the most unlikely season-series sweep in NBA history. The current record is the Bulls (21-61) winning both games over the Lakers (58-24) in the 2001-02 season. Those Lakers had a 45-percentage-point advantage in record over Chicago.
Here are the biggest record disparities of season-series sweeps against a better team (minimum: two games). The sweeping team’s win percentage is on the left. The swept team’s win percentage is on the right. The difference is in the middle:
The only season series with more than two games to crack the leaderboard: The Warriors (42-40) winning all three games against the Mavericks (67-15) in 2006-07. Of course, No. 8 seed Golden State – “We Believe” – upset No. 1 seed Dallas in the playoffs that season.
Thankfully for the Bucks, they won’t have to worry about facing Phoenix in the postseason.
SuperSunsFan wrote:I knew the Suns were always one great point away, I just didn't think even just having an average point who wasn't even a true point would result in such notable improvement, imagine what a kemba or Kyrie would do to this team.
Waylay13 wrote:SuperSunsFan wrote:I knew the Suns were always one great point away, I just didn't think even just having an average point who wasn't even a true point would result in such notable improvement, imagine what a kemba or Kyrie would do to this team.
Well with Kyrie it would be not getting the ball to the others and bitch because his team isnt going anywhere. The Suns need a creator for others not more hero ball bullcrap.
grumpysaddle wrote:Jdiddy701 wrote:Suns might win out this season... for once, it’s a good thing. Ayton and Oubre were sooooo great today. Ayton’s physicality, and Oubre’s energy was so great to see today.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Maybe Suns were just trying to be so far behind in the standings to allow them to finish the year strong and still get a high pick... a preview of the Suns to come. Wishful thinking, but...
SuperSunsFan wrote:AtheJ415 wrote:Calvin Klein wrote:
Well...he did sign that contract so...it's not like anybody was forcing him to do it.
Not only that, but it's beyond revisionist history. Bledsoe was ALL ABOUT playing for Bob so long as Bob gave him a new, more expensive contract. Dude did not give a damn about playing for a winner. He wanted to get PAID. And there's nothing wrong with that, but don't then sit there and claim he just wanted to win when he was fully ready to sign on here for even MORE years.
this is the problem of living in divisive world everyone views things black and white, things usually is somewhere in the middle. Bledsoe is a greedy s**t but still doesn't change the fact that he wanted to leave because Suns was a dumpster fire because he was in a contract year and being on a winning team making a run for the playoff was important for him to showcase suitors that he could play winning basketball not just a player putting up empty stat and not to mention the exposure of being on a winning team in addition to many other factors like uncertainty with Bob trying to lowball him once again. Gee this just because he signed a contract with Sarver means he must put up with his sh*ttiness and can't complain about Bob being a sh**ty owner is the true revisionist, since i remember they were already having badblood during the last negotiation, we didn't know Bob was this bad until the time and many mistakes have cemented our views on him, Bledsoe might be willing to play for a lousy owner for a outrageously lucrative contract, but not to the extent of Bob when Bob's incompetence as a nba owner is unprecedentedly legendary.
