ImageImageImage

2016 Draft

Moderators: bwgood77, lilfishi22, Qwigglez

Who would you prefer to take with the Washington pick?

Chriss
20
27%
Davis
5
7%
Korkmaz
2
3%
Labissiere
4
5%
Luwawu
12
16%
Rabb
12
16%
Sabonis
20
27%
 
Total votes: 75

User avatar
bwgood77
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 98,147
And1: 61,002
Joined: Feb 06, 2009
Location: Austin
Contact:
   

Re: 2016 Draft and College Ball 

Post#1761 » by bwgood77 » Wed Apr 6, 2016 5:19 pm

jcsunsfan wrote:
bwgood77 wrote:
MathiasPW wrote:I have been mostly quiet on Draft and Trade threads, and just realized why I spend so much time reading and gathering opinions while I have none of my own.

I concluded that at this point, I have absolutely no idea what we need for our team.

We don't have a system in place, we don't even have a coach for next season, and are left to fill the blanks when figuring if we will continue with the dual PG system.

How am I to choose between a stretch four like Ellenson or a post guy like Sabonis if I can't tell what job our frontcourt will have next season ?

When looking at the backcourt, should I pay attention to a combo guard like Murray or Hield, or expect us to go back to traditional basketball with a guy like Dunn ?
I don't know how to evaluate talent. I must take fit into account,and then see what particular characteristics of each player available best fill these needs.
And at this point, it's impossible to say what our needs are, given we have absolutely no hint at what we are aiming at.

It's frustrating not to know where we are headed.


Yes, it's tough to know. I think one thing we DO know, is that McD will try to turn this team into a competitive playoff team for next year, whether that is the best idea for the Suns long term or not....he has said things like "we are not as far off as some people might think".


IOW

"We are alot better than our present record would indicate because we are tanking big time."

BTW. I have never ever seen a Suns team so blatantly tank. They play competitively through three quarters and then "inexplicably" run scrub lineups and weird schemes throughout the 4th quarter.


Yeah, but he was said that a few weeks back before we were tanking so blatantly. We have been playing more competitively through three quarters much of the time more lately though, of course.
ImNotMcDiSwear
General Manager
Posts: 8,287
And1: 6,411
Joined: Dec 14, 2013
 

Re: 2016 Draft and College Ball 

Post#1762 » by ImNotMcDiSwear » Wed Apr 6, 2016 5:38 pm

I think we will attempt to compete for a playoff spot next season. It makes a lot of sense. Big free agents available the following year, rookies starting to hit RFA. Starting next season, we're back on the up-cycle. Make no mistake about it.

For those of you hoping for more lottery picks, just remember - we still have Miami's picks coming our way. I expect us to hold on to all of Tucker, Knight and Chandler this offseason and come away from the draft with one rookie power forward who can contribute.
User avatar
Djedefre
Senior
Posts: 729
And1: 939
Joined: May 31, 2014
 

Re: 2016 Draft and College Ball 

Post#1763 » by Djedefre » Wed Apr 6, 2016 7:23 pm

I refuse to believe we will make the same mistake for the third time. Free agents + PHX? Ha, sounds funny.
NavLDO
Suns Forum Defensive Player of the Year
Posts: 2,749
And1: 1,436
Joined: Aug 25, 2014
     

Re: 2016 Draft and College Ball 

Post#1764 » by NavLDO » Wed Apr 6, 2016 8:08 pm

cosmofizzo wrote:I think we will attempt to compete for a playoff spot next season. It makes a lot of sense. Big free agents available the following year, rookies starting to hit RFA. Starting next season, we're back on the up-cycle. Make no mistake about it.

For those of you hoping for more lottery picks, just remember - we still have Miami's picks coming our way. I expect us to hold on to all of Tucker, Knight and Chandler this offseason and come away from the draft with one rookie power forward who can contribute.


It really only makes sense because Sarver is our owner. If he could just 'eat' some profits for one more season, and allow his GM to build a contender the right way, I think we could potentially be a force by the '17/'18 season.

You want to see something disturbing?

http://www.spotrac.com/nba/phoenix-suns/cap/

57% of our cap is tied to three players--Bledsoe, Knight, and Chandler--with the 33 YO as the healthiest, most productive of the 3:

http://www.basketball-reference.com/play-index/pcm_finder.cgi?request=1&sum=0&y1=2016&p1=bledser01&y2=2016&p2=knighbr03&y3=2016&p3=chandty01&p4=&p5=&p6=

-eFG% = .576 for Chandler, vice .502 (Bledsoe)/.482 (Knight)
-WS = 3.3 (Chandler), 2.3 (Bledsoe), 1.5 (Knight)
-ORtg = 112 (Chandler), 106 (Bledsoe), 100 (Knight)
-DRtg = 107 (Chandler), 107 (Bledsoe), 111 (Knight)

That's a problem, IMO. Next year, that number drops to 43.8%, but Knight is still sucking up 14% of our cap. So that's 44% of our cap spent on 3 non-All-Stars.

I know we have to have a few vets on the squad, but do they have to be $13-14M, non-All-star types??? I'm fairly confident we could sign Teletovic for about 2/3 of what we signed Knight for (maybe $9ish or 3 years?) And based upon Leuer's virtually mediocre play the past couple of months, maybe get him in at $6 per (equivalent to about $4.5M last year). Or how about Tucker for $6M for another couple of years. I'd feel a lot better spending $15M on Teletovic and Tucker, than $14M on Knight.

OK, enough of that. Anyone have any thoughts about Tyler Lydon form Syracuse? I hope he declares, at least initially. Any Freshman that had any semblance of a decent season should heavily consider declaring in a weak-ish draft class. Lydon shot 40.5% from 3 on 4 attempts per 30 minutes. He's 20YO (kinda old for a Frosh), and likely about 6' 10", 215 lbs, with a 7' Wingspan, and would probably go late lottery. Why wait til next season when your 3PT% might dip to the low-to-mid 30s, and will be 21, and could drop out of the 1st all-together? IDK, just a thought.
ImNotMcDiSwear
General Manager
Posts: 8,287
And1: 6,411
Joined: Dec 14, 2013
 

Re: 2016 Draft and College Ball 

Post#1765 » by ImNotMcDiSwear » Wed Apr 6, 2016 8:21 pm

NavLDO wrote:
cosmofizzo wrote:I think we will attempt to compete for a playoff spot next season. It makes a lot of sense. Big free agents available the following year, rookies starting to hit RFA. Starting next season, we're back on the up-cycle. Make no mistake about it.

For those of you hoping for more lottery picks, just remember - we still have Miami's picks coming our way. I expect us to hold on to all of Tucker, Knight and Chandler this offseason and come away from the draft with one rookie power forward who can contribute.


It really only makes sense because Sarver is our owner. If he could just 'eat' some profits for one more season, and allow his GM to build a contender the right way, I think we could potentially be a force by the '17/'18 season.

You want to see something disturbing?

http://www.spotrac.com/nba/phoenix-suns/cap/

57% of our cap is tied to three players--Bledsoe, Knight, and Chandler--with the 33 YO as the healthiest, most productive of the 3:

http://www.basketball-reference.com/play-index/pcm_finder.cgi?request=1&sum=0&y1=2016&p1=bledser01&y2=2016&p2=knighbr03&y3=2016&p3=chandty01&p4=&p5=&p6=

-eFG% = .576 for Chandler, vice .502 (Bledsoe)/.482 (Knight)
-WS = 3.3 (Chandler), 2.3 (Bledsoe), 1.5 (Knight)
-ORtg = 112 (Chandler), 106 (Bledsoe), 100 (Knight)
-DRtg = 107 (Chandler), 107 (Bledsoe), 111 (Knight)

That's a problem, IMO. Next year, that number drops to 43.8%, but Knight is still sucking up 14% of our cap. So that's 44% of our cap spent on 3 non-All-Stars.

I know we have to have a few vets on the squad, but do they have to be $13-14M, non-All-star types??? I'm fairly confident we could sign Teletovic for about 2/3 of what we signed Knight for (maybe $9ish or 3 years?) And based upon Leuer's virtually mediocre play the past couple of months, maybe get him in at $6 per (equivalent to about $4.5M last year). Or how about Tucker for $6M for another couple of years. I'd feel a lot better spending $15M on Teletovic and Tucker, than $14M on Knight.


Six million dollars for Jon Leuer? I heard Hakim Warrick is available...

You take the opportunities you get. You can't just go out and get a max free agent. They have to agree to sign. That's not a plan at all.

I think we're going about this the right way. Hindsight isn't always 20/20. People are complaining because of the way things are going right now, not the way things are likely to go in the future.

And frankly, I'm pretty sick of everyone blaming Sarver for everything. It's nuts. You wish we had taken the Philly route to rebuilding? I don't see dividends being paid there. Boston? Well, while we've drafted Len, Warren and Booker, they've drafted Olynyk, James Young and Rozier. I wouldn't swap assets with either.

Be cool, my babies, be cool
Damkac
Analyst
Posts: 3,143
And1: 3,062
Joined: Apr 18, 2011
Location: Poland

Re: 2016 Draft and College Ball 

Post#1766 » by Damkac » Wed Apr 6, 2016 8:36 pm

I really belive Suns should use next year for player development and tanking
McD tried to compete before and this leaves him with Knight instead of Laker's pick and overpriced Chandler.
This offseason almost every team will have cap space so it's scary to see how big contracts top free agents will get. Wouldn't it be wiser to let other teams spend and try to sign somebody next year? That free agent class looks better than this year anyway.
ImNotMcDiSwear
General Manager
Posts: 8,287
And1: 6,411
Joined: Dec 14, 2013
 

Re: 2016 Draft and College Ball 

Post#1767 » by ImNotMcDiSwear » Wed Apr 6, 2016 9:08 pm

Damkac wrote:I really belive Suns should use next year for player development and tanking
McD tried to compete before and this leaves him with Knight instead of Laker's pick and overpriced Chandler.
This offseason almost every team will have cap space so it's scary to see how big contracts top free agents will get. Wouldn't it be wiser to let other teams spend and try to sign somebody next year? That free agent class looks better than this year anyway.


So your plan is to tank for a year and then attract a top-tier free agent the following offseason?

Hmmm...
Damkac
Analyst
Posts: 3,143
And1: 3,062
Joined: Apr 18, 2011
Location: Poland

Re: 2016 Draft and College Ball 

Post#1768 » by Damkac » Wed Apr 6, 2016 9:23 pm

Suns also won't attract a top-tier free agents after tanking this year. And without big signing Suns can't compete for playoffs.
ImNotMcDiSwear
General Manager
Posts: 8,287
And1: 6,411
Joined: Dec 14, 2013
 

Re: 2016 Draft and College Ball 

Post#1769 » by ImNotMcDiSwear » Wed Apr 6, 2016 9:31 pm

Damkac wrote:... without big signing Suns can't compete for playoffs.


Disagree. We have a ton of talent on paper. The questions are, in my mind:

1. Is there a coach that can get this squad to play the right way?
2. Can we stay healthy?

I think we have a chance to make a big improvement next year without making any big additions.
jcsunsfan
Head Coach
Posts: 6,477
And1: 4,829
Joined: Dec 20, 2006
     

Re: 2016 Draft and College Ball 

Post#1770 » by jcsunsfan » Wed Apr 6, 2016 9:48 pm

cosmofizzo wrote:
Damkac wrote:... without big signing Suns can't compete for playoffs.


Disagree. We have a ton of talent on paper. The questions are, in my mind:

1. Is there a coach that can get this squad to play the right way?
2. Can we stay healthy?

I think we have a chance to make a big improvement next year without making any big additions.


I agree. Although a trade might help. We will add Bledsoe and TJ back from injuries.

We will also add potentially four decent draft picks PLUS Bogdan.

We have all kinds future trade assets. And players like TJ, Booker, Len, and even Archie should improve.
NavLDO
Suns Forum Defensive Player of the Year
Posts: 2,749
And1: 1,436
Joined: Aug 25, 2014
     

Re: 2016 Draft and College Ball 

Post#1771 » by NavLDO » Wed Apr 6, 2016 9:56 pm

cosmofizzo wrote:
NavLDO wrote:
cosmofizzo wrote:I think we will attempt to compete for a playoff spot next season. It makes a lot of sense. Big free agents available the following year, rookies starting to hit RFA. Starting next season, we're back on the up-cycle. Make no mistake about it.

For those of you hoping for more lottery picks, just remember - we still have Miami's picks coming our way. I expect us to hold on to all of Tucker, Knight and Chandler this offseason and come away from the draft with one rookie power forward who can contribute.


It really only makes sense because Sarver is our owner. If he could just 'eat' some profits for one more season, and allow his GM to build a contender the right way, I think we could potentially be a force by the '17/'18 season.

You want to see something disturbing?

http://www.spotrac.com/nba/phoenix-suns/cap/

57% of our cap is tied to three players--Bledsoe, Knight, and Chandler--with the 33 YO as the healthiest, most productive of the 3:

http://www.basketball-reference.com/play-index/pcm_finder.cgi?request=1&sum=0&y1=2016&p1=bledser01&y2=2016&p2=knighbr03&y3=2016&p3=chandty01&p4=&p5=&p6=

-eFG% = .576 for Chandler, vice .502 (Bledsoe)/.482 (Knight)
-WS = 3.3 (Chandler), 2.3 (Bledsoe), 1.5 (Knight)
-ORtg = 112 (Chandler), 106 (Bledsoe), 100 (Knight)
-DRtg = 107 (Chandler), 107 (Bledsoe), 111 (Knight)

That's a problem, IMO. Next year, that number drops to 43.8%, but Knight is still sucking up 14% of our cap. So that's 44% of our cap spent on 3 non-All-Stars.

I know we have to have a few vets on the squad, but do they have to be $13-14M, non-All-star types??? I'm fairly confident we could sign Teletovic for about 2/3 of what we signed Knight for (maybe $9ish or 3 years?) And based upon Leuer's virtually mediocre play the past couple of months, maybe get him in at $6 per (equivalent to about $4.5M last year). Or how about Tucker for $6M for another couple of years. I'd feel a lot better spending $15M on Teletovic and Tucker, than $14M on Knight.


Six million dollars for Jon Leuer? I heard Hakim Warrick is available...

You take the opportunities you get. You can't just go out and get a max free agent. They have to agree to sign. That's not a plan at all.

I think we're going about this the right way. Hindsight isn't always 20/20. People are complaining because of the way things are going right now, not the way things are likely to go in the future.

And frankly, I'm pretty sick of everyone blaming Sarver for everything. It's nuts. You wish we had taken the Philly route to rebuilding? I don't see dividends being paid there. Boston? Well, while we've drafted Len, Warren and Booker, they've drafted Olynyk, James Young and Rozier. I wouldn't swap assets with either.

Be cool, my babies, be cool


Whoa...slow down, there, slappy. Where have you been for the past, oh, IDK, 5 years, and Sarver's stunts, interviews, etc.

I never once said Philly, I said stop signing non-All-Stars to 15-20% of our cap. Hindsight?? Really?? How many non-All-NBA, 33 YO players receive $13M per for 4 years? That's not hindsight; everyone knew at the time it was an overpay. Getting quality FAs to sign here? How about develop some youth INTO All-Stars, like many teams do. That's all I'm saying. If anything, as I've stated recently, they should attempt an approach closer to Minny's. I'm saying, quit buying non-All-NBA types, that would be 2 in one year, for 2/5ths of our cap this year, and darn near 1/3 of our cap next year. Especially, when we have another $14M, non-All-NBA contract on the books.

And Jon Leuer, for what would be the equivalent of about $4.2M per last year, is a heck of a lot better than Chandler for 3X that much. Sorry bub, that's not hindsight. Jon Leuer, when actually given minutes, like December, was shooting 53%, 39.4% from 3, bringing in 7 Rebs and scoring nearly 12 per game in 26 minutes per game. That's sure as heck worth about $6M at nest year's Salary Cap number of $89M. We could sign him 15X for that amount. Last year the Cap was $63M, or 71% of next years Cap of, again $89M, so yeah, $6M for a bench PF, which we have how many on contract next season?? Oh, that's right, none!

Knight's contract of $14M was ALSO considered an overpay when it happened. Don't believe me?? Go back to posts both on this forum and the T&T forum. Get outta here with your "hindsight" crap--they were junk deals when they happened. At least Chandler made SOME sense, because we needed a Vet Big, but hey, let's trade away IT, a PG, who cost half as much, and gave more production, for Knight, another PG. Oh wait, he was a 'ball hog', thank goodness Knight's not that way...whew...

So when you ACTUALLY understand what I was posting, and ACTUALLY know the difference between a contract signed under $63M, one signed under $70M (this year), and one signed under an $89M Cap, come on back and discuss.

Where did I EVER say following the Philly model...when did I EVER say we could sign any Max FA...and Sarver??? Yeah, he's the owner, the one paying the bills, hiring and firing GMs and HCs...so yeah, I am gonna blame the owner for some of this; McD owns some of this, for sure, but Sarver is FAR from blameless. So again, when you understand what I was getting at, and understand the Cap situation, then feel free to comment, but until then, making baseless accusations as to what I said is pointless, because that's not what I said...like, not even close...
ImNotMcDiSwear
General Manager
Posts: 8,287
And1: 6,411
Joined: Dec 14, 2013
 

Re: 2016 Draft and College Ball 

Post#1772 » by ImNotMcDiSwear » Wed Apr 6, 2016 10:10 pm

NavLDO wrote:
cosmofizzo wrote:
NavLDO wrote:
It really only makes sense because Sarver is our owner. If he could just 'eat' some profits for one more season, and allow his GM to build a contender the right way, I think we could potentially be a force by the '17/'18 season.

You want to see something disturbing?

http://www.spotrac.com/nba/phoenix-suns/cap/

57% of our cap is tied to three players--Bledsoe, Knight, and Chandler--with the 33 YO as the healthiest, most productive of the 3:

http://www.basketball-reference.com/play-index/pcm_finder.cgi?request=1&sum=0&y1=2016&p1=bledser01&y2=2016&p2=knighbr03&y3=2016&p3=chandty01&p4=&p5=&p6=

-eFG% = .576 for Chandler, vice .502 (Bledsoe)/.482 (Knight)
-WS = 3.3 (Chandler), 2.3 (Bledsoe), 1.5 (Knight)
-ORtg = 112 (Chandler), 106 (Bledsoe), 100 (Knight)
-DRtg = 107 (Chandler), 107 (Bledsoe), 111 (Knight)

That's a problem, IMO. Next year, that number drops to 43.8%, but Knight is still sucking up 14% of our cap. So that's 44% of our cap spent on 3 non-All-Stars.

I know we have to have a few vets on the squad, but do they have to be $13-14M, non-All-star types??? I'm fairly confident we could sign Teletovic for about 2/3 of what we signed Knight for (maybe $9ish or 3 years?) And based upon Leuer's virtually mediocre play the past couple of months, maybe get him in at $6 per (equivalent to about $4.5M last year). Or how about Tucker for $6M for another couple of years. I'd feel a lot better spending $15M on Teletovic and Tucker, than $14M on Knight.


Six million dollars for Jon Leuer? I heard Hakim Warrick is available...

You take the opportunities you get. You can't just go out and get a max free agent. They have to agree to sign. That's not a plan at all.

I think we're going about this the right way. Hindsight isn't always 20/20. People are complaining because of the way things are going right now, not the way things are likely to go in the future.

And frankly, I'm pretty sick of everyone blaming Sarver for everything. It's nuts. You wish we had taken the Philly route to rebuilding? I don't see dividends being paid there. Boston? Well, while we've drafted Len, Warren and Booker, they've drafted Olynyk, James Young and Rozier. I wouldn't swap assets with either.

Be cool, my babies, be cool


Whoa...slow down, there, slappy. Where have you been for the past, oh, IDK, 5 years, and Sarver's stunts, interviews, etc.

I never once said Philly, I said stop signing non-All-Stars to 15-20% of our cap. Hindsight?? Really?? How many non-All-NBA, 33 YO players receive $13M per for 4 years? That's not hindsight; everyone knew at the time it was an overpay. Getting quality FAs to sign here? How about develop some youth INTO All-Stars, like many teams do. That's all I'm saying. If anything, as I've stated recently, they should attempt an approach closer to Minny's. I'm saying, quit buying non-All-NBA types, that would be 2 in one year, for 2/5ths of our cap this year, and darn near 1/3 of our cap next year. Especially, when we have another $14M, non-All-NBA contract on the books.

And Jon Leuer, for what would be the equivalent of about $4.2M per last year, is a heck of a lot better than Chandler for 3X that much. Sorry bub, that's not hindsight. Jon Leuer, when actually given minutes, like December, was shooting 53%, 39.4% from 3, bringing in 7 Rebs and scoring nearly 12 per game in 26 minutes per game. That's sure as heck worth about $6M at nest year's Salary Cap number of $89M. We could sign him 15X for that amount. Last year the Cap was $63M, or 71% of next years Cap of, again $89M, so yeah, $6M for a bench PF, which we have how many on contract next season?? Oh, that's right, none!

Knight's contract of $14M was ALSO considered an overpay when it happened. Don't believe me?? Go back to posts both on this forum and the T&T forum. Get outta here with your "hindsight" crap--they were junk deals when they happened. At least Chandler made SOME sense, because we needed a Vet Big, but hey, let's trade away IT, a PG, who cost half as much, and gave more production, for Knight, another PG. Oh wait, he was a 'ball hog', thank goodness Knight's not that way...whew...

So when you ACTUALLY understand what I was posting, and ACTUALLY know the difference between a contract signed under $63M, one signed under $70M (this year), and one signed under an $89M Cap, come on back and discuss.

Where did I EVER say following the Philly model...when did I EVER say we could sign any Max FA...and Sarver??? Yeah, he's the owner, the one paying the bills, hiring and firing GMs and HCs...so yeah, I am gonna blame the owner for some of this; McD owns some of this, for sure, but Sarver is FAR from blameless. So again, when you understand what I was getting at, and understand the Cap situation, then feel free to comment, but until then, making baseless accusations as to what I said is pointless, because that's not what I said...like, not even close...


Sorry I upset you. I believe my reading comprehension skills are fine, though.

Following Minnesota's model... I don't even know what that means. First, we must have a superstar and a team willing to give us the #1 pick for him. The following year, we must win the lottery. That's not a plan. You just chose the one team with better young talent than us and said, "We should be them." Might as well say we should be the '84 Bulls.

:)
Saberestar
RealGM
Posts: 22,357
And1: 16,994
Joined: May 21, 2010

Re: 2016 Draft and College Ball 

Post#1773 » by Saberestar » Thu Apr 7, 2016 12:35 am

I have heard the latest interview with Ryan McDonough on Arizona Sports 98.7 and he has said that our core for next season are Bledsoe, Knight, Booker, Warren, Len and our own pick and Washington pick. Those seven players are gonna be our strong core.

No word about Archie Goodwin at all.

He said too that he wants to sign Teletovic to a new contract this summer and that he is happy to hear that Chandler wants to prepare some workouts in the offseason for our players to be ready earlier for next season.

http://arizonasports.com/player/?a=320596
TeamTragic
General Manager
Posts: 9,000
And1: 7,028
Joined: Feb 18, 2015
 

Re: 2016 Draft and College Ball 

Post#1774 » by TeamTragic » Thu Apr 7, 2016 7:32 am

Saberestar wrote:I have heard the latest interview with Ryan McDonough on Arizona Sports 98.7 and he has said that our core for next season are Bledsoe, Knight, Booker, Warren, Len and our own pick and Washington pick. Those seven players are gonna be our strong core.

No word about Archie Goodwin at all.

He said too that he wants to sign Teletovic to a new contract this summer and that he is happy to hear that Chandler wants to prepare some workouts in the offseason for our players to be ready earlier for next season.

http://arizonasports.com/player/?a=320596


Stop the insanity already with Knight. What a joke. Teletovic and Bogdan next season? However I expect more "injuries" next year when we inevitably figure out that other teams in our conference are that much better.

What follows will hopefully be a masterful tank job and complete insanity during 2017 FA.
gaspar
Suns Forum Stat Stuffer
Posts: 6,761
And1: 5,479
Joined: Jun 21, 2009

Re: 2016 Draft and College Ball 

Post#1775 » by gaspar » Thu Apr 7, 2016 9:18 am

[tweet]https://twitter.com/SBJLizMullen/status/717718062829424647[/tweet]
Schwartz is also Chandler's and Mirza's agent.
letsgosuns
Veteran
Posts: 2,885
And1: 2,167
Joined: Jan 28, 2014

Re: 2016 Draft and College Ball 

Post#1776 » by letsgosuns » Thu Apr 7, 2016 9:46 am

I listened to McDonough's interview today as well and found some of his answers very alarming. He mentioned how at the time Bledsoe went down that the Suns were just a couple games out of the eight seed and then described how Potland had a big surge to become a playoff contender and what if that could have been the Suns. I heard that and immediately thought this guy is completely out to lunch. The Suns were 12-19 when Bledsoe got injured. Newsflash McDonough. THAT MEANS YOUR TEAM SUCKS!

I have zero faith McDonough knows how to build a team. He might be great at picking in the draft, but he has shown for three years straight that he cannot build a contending team. And I have no reason to believe he will miraculously learn how to do it overnight. I will never forget he is the man that chose to put a team together of Bledsoe, Dragic, and Thomas, AND draft a point guard too. Then he goes out and trades three of the point guards only to bring in a far worse point guard in Knight (you do not need another point guard in the first place) and give him a huge salary.

McDonough's vision is totally flawed. It does not take a genius to recognize that a dual point guard lineup does not work. Especially when the two players are undersized, inconsistent shooters, and turnover prone. Kidd and Hardaway could have worked if not for injuries but those are historically great hall of fame players who were also incredible passers and unselfish and tall. That is the opposite of what the Suns currently have. If Bledsoe, Knight, and Booker are all on the team next year and start together, next season is over before it begins, just like this season was with Bledsoe and Knight starting. Dragic said it best when he said multiple point guards do not work because there is only one ball. Stop trying to reinvent the wheel with some idiotic undersized dual point guard garbage and get back to the tried and true way of winning a championship with the biggest, most talented, and smartest players you can find.
ImNotMcDiSwear
General Manager
Posts: 8,287
And1: 6,411
Joined: Dec 14, 2013
 

Re: 2016 Draft and College Ball 

Post#1777 » by ImNotMcDiSwear » Thu Apr 7, 2016 12:45 pm

letsgosuns wrote:I listened to McDonough's interview today as well and found some of his answers very alarming. He mentioned how at the time Bledsoe went down that the Suns were just a couple games out of the eight seed and then described how Potland had a big surge to become a playoff contender and what if that could have been the Suns. I heard that and immediately thought this guy is completely out to lunch. The Suns were 12-19 when Bledsoe got injured. Newsflash McDonough. THAT MEANS YOUR TEAM SUCKS!

I have zero faith McDonough knows how to build a team. He might be great at picking in the draft, but he has shown for three years straight that he cannot build a contending team. And I have no reason to believe he will miraculously learn how to do it overnight. I will never forget he is the man that chose to put a team together of Bledsoe, Dragic, and Thomas, AND draft a point guard too. Then he goes out and trades three of the point guards only to bring in a far worse point guard in Knight (you do not need another point guard in the first place) and give him a huge salary.

McDonough's vision is totally flawed. It does not take a genius to recognize that a dual point guard lineup does not work. Especially when the two players are undersized, inconsistent shooters, and turnover prone. Kidd and Hardaway could have worked if not for injuries but those are historically great hall of fame players who were also incredible passers and unselfish and tall. That is the opposite of what the Suns currently have. If Bledsoe, Knight, and Booker are all on the team next year and start together, next season is over before it begins, just like this season was with Bledsoe and Knight starting. Dragic said it best when he said multiple point guards do not work because there is only one ball. Stop trying to reinvent the wheel with some idiotic undersized dual point guard garbage and get back to the tried and true way of winning a championship with the biggest, most talented, and smartest players you can find.


Sounds like you think he had a choice in the talent he acquired. My read of things is, he took the talent that was available. His statements in the press about how the team will work should not be taken at face value. His goal has been, from day 1, to acquire assets. He's not particularly worried about how those assets fit together for now. Going forward, I'd be willing to bet, you see a GM that tries to put together a team that fits and works. That transition will happen slowly - I don't think we'll be in any rush - but it will happen, and it will start the day after the draft.
jcsunsfan
Head Coach
Posts: 6,477
And1: 4,829
Joined: Dec 20, 2006
     

Re: 2016 Draft and College Ball 

Post#1778 » by jcsunsfan » Thu Apr 7, 2016 6:55 pm

Aquiring assets is much easier than building a team. That takes time, especially with young players. We are not going to go from bottom three in the league to a top 4 playoff seed. We are going to be a 5-8 seed and some point, and some fans are going to hate it, but its a step in the process for a young team. Bledsoe is our oldest building block asset at 26. Chandler has bought in and is taking leadership. The players who are here have really bought in.

These players will be gone this summer. Leuer and Archie.

The only thing I found disturbing was his defense of Knight. He clearly indicated that Knight is part of the future of this team and that he has been somewhat injured all year and that hampered his performance. I believe that he is being sincere in talking about Knights future and he is not trying to puff for a trade. OK, fine. As long as he comes off the bench.
Damkac
Analyst
Posts: 3,143
And1: 3,062
Joined: Apr 18, 2011
Location: Poland

Re: 2016 Draft and College Ball 

Post#1779 » by Damkac » Thu Apr 7, 2016 7:44 pm

Do you expect him to say "acquiring Knight was a mistake, we wants to trade him"?

BTW could we discuss draft in draft thread, trades in trades thread etc? This board becomes very messy lately.
User avatar
sunsbum
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,539
And1: 5,396
Joined: May 16, 2007
Location: Portland
     

Re: 2016 Draft and College Ball 

Post#1780 » by sunsbum » Fri Apr 8, 2016 3:47 am

I think I like Sabonis, he seems to be fundamentally sound and crafty enough to play below the rim. The biggest question in my mind....is he a McD guy and where do you draft him? If we don't have a shot at Ingram I'd like us to trade down and grab him if he isn't projected to go around our first pick.
"Mannnnn I’m like the guy that pissed this whole board off saying literally all year no Mikal, no Mikal in the KD trade."

Return to Phoenix Suns