gaspar wrote:Saberestar wrote:Damkac wrote:Warriors plays at fast pace and don't have any low post scorer but they are first in assists and mile above everyone else. So that is not a excuse
Players are part of the problem but other part is coaching.
Please, let's draft somebody who is good at passing. If not Lonzo then somebody else. Too many selfish player on this team.
The Warrios has a terrific roster, one of the best in the history of the game. We do not. That is the most important thing.
I think that Watson is making a decent job, I am OK with him. He is a motivator, and that is big for a HC, every player wants to play and fight for him. IMO that respect from the players in the best attribute that a coach can have nowadays.
About the offensive schemes...I mean, the plays that we run are classical and similar to what a lot of teams run in the NBA. Like a coach you can change some things and run especific sets here and there, but usually the systems in the league are the same with just a few changes. It is the personnel involved who makes big differences in the flow of the game and the results of the plays.
We lack great talent and players with good vision/passing to run difficult sets, our best passers are too young and raw (Ulis and Bender) to play consistent minutes and be effective out there. With time we are gonna be better at passing.
The youngsters are going to play more minutes in the next few months, and if you look the minutes played for other rookies in the league they are playing similar or even less minutes than Chriss, Bender and Ulis.
We need to remember that Watson started Booker over Knight (who is playing under 25 minutes per game) and Warren over Tucker. That's was not a sure thing in the summer.
I want to give Watson at least the full season to see if we are in good hands.
I wholeheartedly agree with you.
X's and O's, rotations etc. is something every coach can improve with more experience. Charisma is something you are born with. You can't really learn how to be a leader. Watson is a great motivator and leader. I'm not sure he's the right guy to be our coach long-term, but I think he's the right choice for this season.
There are several things he deserves some credit for:
1. He solved potentially troubling situation with Knight/Booker better than anyone could hope.
2. The team has an identity: we are playing fast and aggressively. The Suns are in top-10 in the league in:
- pace - 1st
- fast break points - 3rd
- 2nd chance points - 8th
- points in the paint - 10th
- points off turnovers - 4th
- FTA/G - 3rd
- rebound percentage - 10th (6th DefReb, 11 OffReb)
- steals - 7th
- opponents turnovers - 3rd
- loose balls recovered - 7th
- charges drawn - 4th
- screen assists - 8th
3. The Suns are among the best teams in the league in the 3rd quarter (10th in NetRtg +5.8). Locker room pep talk and half-time adjustments?
4. I don't have any stats to backs this up, but it seems that our execution out of the time-outs is be better than previously. (Perhaps It's just a matter of very low standards set by our previous 2 coaches when we had huge problems just to inbound the ball).
As for assists, when I read this forum I sometimes wonder if I'm in a parallel universe where assists are worth more than points (It must the Nash effect). In reality there's no corelation between assist numbers and efficient offense. This season the top two teams in terms of offensive efficiency are the Warriors and Raptors. Warriors are 1st in assist rate, the Raptors are 29th.
Great post. I don't think many coaches out there would be doing any better than Watson is, especially when you consider overall that TJ and Booker start, and all three rookies have gotten a pretty good share of playing time. I do hope that they continue to get as much time when TJ gets back (not at the expense of him but perhaps the expense of others, though I realize that might be tough to do unless trades are made).
However there is a pretty high correlation between assist rate and offensive efficiency. The others near the top (Houston, San Antonio, Cleveland, LAC) are all top 10 in assist ratio and Toronto is somewhat of an anomaly.
There is also an enormous gap between the two teams tied at 28th in assist ratio, and the last place Suns (the Suns trail them by as much as they trail the team in 12th).
Having said that, I don't think this is necessarily Watson's fault, at least not all of it. I certainly think he wants ball movement and wants people to shoot open shots.
But I believe some players are set in their ways so much that they are almost uncoachable. Knight, for example. I don't think he intentionally sets his mind out not to pass, but when he gets into the game his instincts just take over and these things can be tough to change. There is a reason Knight was traded twice during his rookie contract.
Obviously Watson could have given him the same treatment D'Antoni gave Marbury in NY (if he has full control over roster playing time), but that doesn't do anything for his trade value or add to the positive team energy he is trying to create, and he needed to give him a chance in his new role.
Basically I think assists will also be more prevalent in teams that have played together for a long time, much more so than one that is very young with players playing together for the first time (unless they are savvy vets).
I think the primary problem with assists though does not lie with Watson but with the age and roster make up, which he has no control over.
I think many fans have watched some of the best offensive orchestrators ever lead the Suns over the last 25+ years though and many love to watch great ball movement rather than ISO. While it is possible having good or great offensive efficiency with isolation play, it typically requires a great isolation player taking a large percentage of your shots. We seem to have a lot of young offensively talented players, and I think in time, if they can learn to play more team ball rather than isolation the sum can possibly be greater than it's individual parts.