MathiasPW wrote:We should never shoot down ideas based on the reason that they will mess up previously defined strategies/rosters.
If an idea is good, we implement it being mindful with the impacts it has on decisions made before. The cap one, for example, we can implement in stages, where we start with a very large cap figure that gets reduced gradually over time, so teams contending can adjust their roster over a couple of seasons (at least).
On the 8 or 7 keepers + 1st round pick idea, I still need to come up with a system that takes into account 1st round picks that get traded, so whoever's traded them can't just keep the 8th player every year.
Overall, I think the league has observed some up and down movement in standings, but there are a few consistent contenders and a few consistent bottomdwellers that may indicate we are not giving them a good enough chance to mix things up every season. The dynasty league should allow people to build over time and see the development of their good ideas, but should also give people the chance to compete every season. It's a fine balance.
Yeah, I tried to make a trade earlier and told the guy in the trade that since he would be sending me his 1st round pick, he could only have 7 keepers or something like that, and I think it makes things much more difficult.
I think that in general, 8 keepers works because of the influx of rookies each year and more people with good vets contributing them may move on from them. Originally I think we were considering moving to 9.
























