bwgood77 wrote:lilfishi22 wrote:Qwigglez wrote:I think a soft reset is in order this summer.
We likely won't get a great value out of trading KD, but it's worth pursuing a trade if it helps short-term and long-term.
I don't see us trading Booker under any circumstances unless he specifically asks to be traded. I'm not sure he'd do that at this stage in his career. Since Ishbia had the courtesy of allowing KD to choose his destination by NOT trading him to the Warriors OR Grizzlies, I would assume he will give Booker that same courtesy. This goes a long way in helping set a certain precedence for potential free agents in the future.
Beal won't be moved until his contract is closer to expiring.
Royce O'Neal contract runs until 2027-28 season. It's a great valuable contract for a quality veteran. Ideally the Suns can move him to a championship caliber team for a younger player but we'll see. Same with Grayson Allen.
I'm of the same mindset.
I think we
need a soft reset. Sell KD to the highest bidder, ideally there's some useful players coming back (but focus on draft capital) and continue to compete with Book as the man. As I've said before, trading Book is a non-starter, UNLESS we get some messaging from his camp that he wants out. We're not gonna do him like the Mavs did Luka.
Move Grayson for more size (and maybe a pick). Keep Royce as he probably has more value to us than on the market and he does a lot of what Grayson does but with more size and rebounding.
I think if they are smart, they may talk to Book and say "look, we tried with KD, but obviously it's not working, so we feel it is best to move him and we feel we need to get younger, more athletic, better defensively, and bigger" and discuss what they think they can do and what is possible.
I think it kind of sucks because I think it's smart for both parties to move on. I think it's pretty obvious that if we keep Book as a Suns lifer, we now don't have the capital or assets to get enough pieces around him to compete at a high level. Now we could hold out for 2027 free agency and hope we can sign some star, but is Book, some other star and a bunch of journeyman role players much different?
The thing is, if we can't trade Book to Houston for our picks, a rebuild doesn't make total sense unless we somehow get a bunch of good young players for him from another team and/or picks we know are good.
What is interesting is that Booker's career is kind of mirroring Beal's. Book is looking great as a playmaker averaging 6.6 apg, after hitting his career highs in scoring the last couple of years. Beal, at 28, the year after he averaged over 31 ppg, averaged 6.6 apg when he was 28. Beal experienced winning some playoff rounds earlier in his career than Book did, whereas Book didn't do so until we got Paul.
Beal did start dealing with more injuries that year when he was 28, and then the max contract that he got and now Book has, started looking worse and worse.
Booker is viewed as a premier asset right now I believe. But I think that value probably could start to decline in not too long. Right now he is in his absolute prime (though he is having a down year shooting overall), but he has 3 more years on his deal before he is an existing FA. I'm not saying he will get a lot worse soon or anything, but he will be under contract for fewer years and approaching the wrong side of 30.
Beal was one of the first 35% super maxes though, and with his injuries, his contract has declined. With some of these big extensions into the $70 millions for some of these guys like Embiid, some of these contracts that have already been signed from like Booker's class probably won't ever look like a bad contract.
I know you both stated that you don't think we would trade him under any circumstances, but would you risk letting him go into UFA in 3 years? We could potentially extend him.
How good, realistically, with the state of the rest of the west, do you think we can get with him? Now I understand that you can also ask the question how good could we get without him?
It's quite the quandary. Because he's been great for the franchise overall, even though it's mostly come with losing a lot of games, outside of the Paul years, but he has been the bright spot. But he does have his supermax, so is it better to keep him here or gauge with him how he feels? Maybe say we would love for you to be a Sun for life but we also know we are not as competitive as either of us would have liked, and we understand if you'd like to get to a contender. I am not sure the best way to broach or pose that conversation. But it seems like an obvious one that should be had.
I also wish Dillon Brooks wasn't in Houston. I feel like if we do trade him there we need to take Brooks, though I wouldn't really want to...he makes a bit much for what he does. Though we did want him before and he plays 30+ minutes for a really good Houston game, so clearly he must be contributing quite a bit. He has always brought toughness and scrappiness, from when he was at Oregon playing against AZ. Of course I'd prefer Green along with one of their PFs and maybe another prospect and a couple picks.
But I digress.
Back to my question, do you just go into UFA with him in 3 years? Do you think we extend him? Do you think he will want to extend if we trade KD? Do you think he will want to stay here? I think he would want to if he knew we would, but he doesn't seem to be quite at the tier where he makes us relevant by himself, like Dirk, or Kobe, where those guys would not miss the playoffs regardless and you just needed the pieces.