ImageImageImage

We need a real PF

Moderators: bwgood77, lilfishi22, Qwigglez

JMac1
Suns Forum Training Specialist
Posts: 10,032
And1: 4,004
Joined: May 23, 2009

Re: We need a real PF 

Post#41 » by JMac1 » Wed Jul 14, 2010 3:00 pm

TXSun wrote:just as I brought him up yesterday, he's gone. first Dallas was close now Denver sealing the deal. My option at PF, Al Harrington, is off the block.



We have a taller, younger, healthier, and better shooter version of him in Frye.
User avatar
GHillDrnksSpryt
Freshman
Posts: 67
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 17, 2010

Re: We need a real PF 

Post#42 » by GHillDrnksSpryt » Wed Jul 14, 2010 3:46 pm

Biscotti wrote:Josh Smith if he is available. Would most likely need to be a 3 team trade. Wizards maybe.


his contract sucks and hes more of a small forward anyways.
Image

much love to kerrsed for this masterpiece.
j127
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 10,015
And1: 41
Joined: Nov 13, 2003
Location: Toronto

Re: We need a real PF 

Post#43 » by j127 » Wed Jul 14, 2010 4:19 pm

People on the Toronto and Phoenix boards keep mentioning Turkoglu. Has the Turk-Barbosa trade actually gone through or not? Or will it imminently happen?
User avatar
Traxxe
Banned User
Posts: 705
And1: 0
Joined: May 24, 2009

Re: We need a real PF 

Post#44 » by Traxxe » Wed Jul 14, 2010 4:35 pm

Turkaglu is in Turkey now. The deal will be announced when we arrange him to fly back to Phoenix. It's a done deal and we haven't been rushing him back.

Childress finished his deal today and was in LA doing strength and conditioning and training there.
Image

Inventor of Fansterbate:

"What if Lebron James, Dwayne Wade, and Chris Bosh could all sign with the Knicks. I just fansterbated all over my keyboard."
cubd8
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,407
And1: 81
Joined: Sep 14, 2005

Re: We need a real PF 

Post#45 » by cubd8 » Wed Jul 14, 2010 4:42 pm

TXSun wrote:I thought this topic deserved its own thread. I'll get this topic started. Yes we acquired Hedo and Childress but these two are wing players at best. Hedo will be a starter more than likely at the PF position and that's going to change how we did things in the past. However we can still bring in a true PF off the bench whenever needed. Who can we bring, who is left out there in this crazy free agency? With that said I say we take a good look at Al Harrington...if our budget permits. The guy is only 30 years old and just finished averaging almost 18 point/game. This a solid role player and he is still available. Thoughts on Al Harrington and/or on whatever PF is left out there that we might benefit from.


Agreed. The Suns can probably get by in the regular season by outscoring teams because I really like all of the wing players (Richardson, Hill, Childress and I think Turkoglu has a comeback season), but playing Turkoglu at PF in the playoffs won't end well. Phoenix can get by with Lopez at center - I liked the toughness he showed last year, and I'm sure Warrick will get some time, but he's a backup player.
User avatar
jlove_26
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,510
And1: 12
Joined: Jun 11, 2002
Location: Phoenix, AZ

Re: We need a real PF 

Post#46 » by jlove_26 » Wed Jul 14, 2010 5:10 pm

Odd things in the West happening.

Sacramento.....they have 5 PF's on their roster (1 is a PF/C in Cousins and 1 is a SF/PF in Greene)

Dallas (post trade)......they have 4 centers Chandler, Haywood, Ajinca, Mahinmi

Phoenix.......we have 5 SMALL PF's (6 if the rumor of re-signing Lou) Frye, Clark, Lawal, Collins, Warrick

Guess everyone is trying to compete with the Lakers for size and depth inside. I'd love to be able to pry at least one PF away from Sacramento (preferably Thompson or Greene......no way they let go of Cousins (thier future center). I'm thinking Dallas is gonna run Chandler and Mahinmi at PF next to Haywood and Ajinca (if they don't trade Ajinca) and Dirk at SF.
jensa
Ballboy
Posts: 33
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 29, 2009

Re: We need a real PF 

Post#47 » by jensa » Wed Jul 14, 2010 5:26 pm

JMac1 wrote:We don't need anything. We can't get anyone to match up against Gasol, so why waste good players thrying to do it? I think we should beat them our way. Give them a tougher match-up than they can give us.

We are starting

Nash
Jrich
Hill
Turk
Lopez, after the first 5 mins in comes Frye for a traditional lineup (even though he isn't a post player)

Nash
Jrich
Turk
Frye
Lopez (This will be our best lineup) then we will sub everyone except Fre at the 2min mark

Dragic
Childress
Dudley
Warrick
Frye, after this lineup runs its course substitution will happen as needed.

Hopefully Clark will get in there somewhere.

Our best Laker line-up

Nash
Childress 6'7 (Kobe)
Turk 6'10 (Artest/Odom)
Frye 6'11 (Gaosl/Odom)
Lopez 7'0 (Bynum/Gasol)

They are inside out, we are PnR then out. Then next year lineup

Nash/Dragic
Childress/Dudley
Turk/Clark
PF/Warrick
Lopez/Frye

No need to get crazy and give JRich away for some bad contracts.


I've been meaning to write basically this exact post for a while (but from my post count you can tell I'm more of a realgm reader than poster).
By having Turk play out of position at the PF spot we are able to utilize the rest of the awesome talent on this team in the best possible way at their natural position. First and second units are stacked!. If we trade JRich for a PF we'd upset the (apparent) balance that the current rotation has. We'd basically have 4 SFs (I'm counting Childress as a SF) sharing the SG/SF spots, and with the addition of the new PF we'd have to take minutes away from Frye/Lopez/Warrick. It may seem like a small thing but having consistent minutes and a well defined roll usually brings out the best in players.

Sure, post defense and rebounding look poor but then again, these are the two worst aspects of Amar'es game. You could argue that our defense will only be better due to quicker rotations on help defense and the overall gain in BBIQ after the departure of Amar'e/Barbs and addition of Turk/Childress. Most of our defensive rebounding came from our wings last year so even if not having a good rebounding PF will hurt us, we already have the "team rebounding" attitude so I hope it won't be too bad.

Don't get me wrong, if we can land a (potential) all-star PF for Jrich then I'm all for it but to force a deal for a "solid" PF just to get a more conventional looking starting unit seems to create more problems than it solves.
User avatar
WTFsunsFTW
Veteran
Posts: 2,700
And1: 113
Joined: Aug 04, 2007
 

Re: We need a real PF 

Post#48 » by WTFsunsFTW » Wed Jul 14, 2010 5:31 pm

Greene as in Donte Greene? The 6'8 forward that we can put behind Turk childress warrick Dudley hill Clark?
User avatar
jlove_26
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,510
And1: 12
Joined: Jun 11, 2002
Location: Phoenix, AZ

Re: We need a real PF 

Post#49 » by jlove_26 » Wed Jul 14, 2010 5:43 pm

WTFsunsFTW wrote:Greene as in Donte Greene? The 6'8 forward that we can put behind Turk childress warrick Dudley hill Clark?


Yes Donte Greene, who is better suited as a run n gun PF ala Josh Smith mold (with better range on his shot).
User avatar
TXSun
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,953
And1: 0
Joined: Aug 03, 2008

Re: We need a real PF 

Post#50 » by TXSun » Wed Jul 14, 2010 5:48 pm

Josh Smith for JRich in some sort of S&T, sure! it might even make sense for ATL since Marvin Williams might be on his way out.
"This is some bull $hit"
User avatar
WTFsunsFTW
Veteran
Posts: 2,700
And1: 113
Joined: Aug 04, 2007
 

Re: We need a real PF 

Post#51 » by WTFsunsFTW » Wed Jul 14, 2010 7:08 pm

JSmith is a tenacious rebounder, great shot blocker, and amazing leaper who would love our system.
azuresou1
Head Coach
Posts: 7,444
And1: 1,097
Joined: Jun 15, 2009
   

Re: We need a real PF 

Post#52 » by azuresou1 » Wed Jul 14, 2010 8:16 pm

You also don't have a single asset that would land you Josh Smith, so I'm not sure why you're bringing him up.
User avatar
WTFsunsFTW
Veteran
Posts: 2,700
And1: 113
Joined: Aug 04, 2007
 

Re: We need a real PF 

Post#53 » by WTFsunsFTW » Wed Jul 14, 2010 8:17 pm

You mean like a huge expiring contract in a SG that can improve the team and allow flexibility next season for JJs huge contract?
User avatar
Kerrsed
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 29,876
And1: 16,578
Joined: Mar 31, 2009
Location: Land of the Internet Memes
Contact:
     

Re: We need a real PF 

Post#54 » by Kerrsed » Wed Jul 14, 2010 8:20 pm

WTFsunsFTW wrote:You mean like a huge expiring contract in a SG that can improve the team and allow flexibility next season for JJs huge contract?


Yeah, sure, like Atlanta really wants JJ/Jrich/Crawford. :nonono:
Fo-Real
RealGM
Posts: 10,274
And1: 5,851
Joined: Mar 21, 2009
     

Re: We need a real PF 

Post#55 » by Fo-Real » Wed Jul 14, 2010 9:12 pm

Hell, trade J. Rich for Gortat and Pietrus. Start Gortat at the Pf. he is quick enough to play the posistion. Pietrus is a great offensive and defensive player and still young, gortat is 26, still learning, hustles his @$$ off and will get a lot of easy baskets in the system. Defensivly starting 7"0 lopez, strong center, Gortat 7'0 defensive Pf. 6"10 Turk, instant offense and good passer for lopez and Gortat, Hill or Pietrus at Sg. offense and defense covered, and Nash. Fry off the bench for lopez, Gortat to C, Fry to Pf, improves the offense and still tall. Orlando would have 2 huge expirings for next year in rich and carter!!! Starting rebounding problem FIXED!!!! Throw in Clark if we can get Bass too!!! Gortat would also be a quicker and viable option in the pick and roll with Nash and Turk, and Grant!!! Big Defensive starting line up. We have enough ofense on this team to overcome his lack of ofense.
Fo-Real
RealGM
Posts: 10,274
And1: 5,851
Joined: Mar 21, 2009
     

Re: We need a real PF 

Post#56 » by Fo-Real » Wed Jul 14, 2010 9:48 pm

GET THAT DONE LON BABBY!!! He would be the teams best defender, he is quick enough to defend Pf.s... Fool Phi into a trade, Orlando would love to get Iggy, Sucker them into taking J. Rich with a huge expiring and the Upside of Clark..... Orlando gets Iggy and who ever makes it work, and we get Gortat and Pietrus if possible or Bass or Ryan Anderson????
User avatar
JohnVancouver
General Manager
Posts: 9,016
And1: 236
Joined: Jun 18, 2007
Location: Vancouver, BC

Re: We need a real PF 

Post#57 » by JohnVancouver » Thu Jul 15, 2010 12:05 am

I love JSmith but really, of the two Pietrus kinda makes more sense - but both are forwards. Are we gonna field tow squads of all-forward lineups?


(As I was typing I thought - geez, much as i have wanted Pietrus for years , Smith is just so great and he would just kill in this system ...." Things are getting very weird in Sunsland. I'ts like everyday is "anything can happen day")
"Deng and Mozgov was some 1980s Clippers sh*t. So, so dumb" - Sedale Threatt

"If you can't get banned for threatening to rape a mod, what can you get banned for?" Jigga_Man/2013

"Everybody love Everybody." - Jackie Moon
Frank Lee
RealGM
Posts: 14,270
And1: 10,098
Joined: Nov 07, 2006

Re: We need a real PF 

Post#58 » by Frank Lee » Fri Jul 16, 2010 8:35 pm

Here you go Fo-Real..... check this out.

http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=25mh596
What ? Me Worry ?
User avatar
KJ7
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 10,004
And1: 2
Joined: Aug 06, 2004

Re: We need a real PF 

Post#59 » by KJ7 » Sat Jul 17, 2010 12:56 am

Frank Lee wrote:Here you go Fo-Real..... check this out.

http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=25mh596


How do we give up 14m and bring back 6m when all teams are over the cap? Not quite sure the trade checker has got this one right.
Image
Frank Lee
RealGM
Posts: 14,270
And1: 10,098
Joined: Nov 07, 2006

Re: We need a real PF 

Post#60 » by Frank Lee » Sat Jul 17, 2010 4:00 am

KJ7 wrote:
Frank Lee wrote:Here you go Fo-Real..... check this out.

http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=25mh596


How do we give up 14m and bring back 6m when all teams are over the cap? Not quite sure the trade checker has got this one right.



Its magic :wizard: Should I call Lon back ?
What ? Me Worry ?

Return to Phoenix Suns