fcuk Khoee

ihateginobili · Post #1 » by **ihateginobili** » Sun Jun 28, 2009 9:07 pm

Talks have completely ended this afternoon on the once "verbally agreed" trade that was done before the draft. The suns told GS to pick Jordan Hill with the 7th pick. Even though GS picked Curry they still felt that he belonged part of the deal. It wouldn’t have mattered who GS picked with the 7th pick, it was part of the deal. This is also my last (serious this time) post on this site.

Take care everyone.

MaryvalesFinest · Post #2 » by **MaryvalesFinest** » Sun Jun 28, 2009 9:09 pm

Nice thread title dude

Turambar · Post #3 » by **Turambar** » Sun Jun 28, 2009 9:12 pm

Sorry to see you go IHG. God speed.

Mr. Sun · Post #4 » by **Mr. Sun** » Sun Jun 28, 2009 9:14 pm

Great, now lets concentrate on getting a C.

harshey1388 · Post #5 » by **harshey1388** » Sun Jun 28, 2009 9:14 pm

well this is bittersweet. hate to see ya go IHG but thanks again for your knowledge.

so now what? Amare stays? Wallace for Chandler would be ideal

Mr. Sun · Post #6 » by **Mr. Sun** » Sun Jun 28, 2009 9:16 pm

harshey1388 wrote:well this is bittersweet. hate to see ya go IHG but thanks again for your knowledge.

so now what? Amare stays? Wallace for Chandler would be ideal

I'm sure there are other "talks" of a amre trade that will surface in the next 30 days.

pidi · Post #7 » by **pidi** » Sun Jun 28, 2009 9:19 pm

sad to see ya go. and thank you for all the information.
we can´t keep ama´re - kerr made it clear, he has to go.

pidi · Post #8 » by **pidi** » Sun Jun 28, 2009 9:22 pm

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZIwhxX_DS8g

haha----

RaisingArizona · Post #9 » by **RaisingArizona** » Sun Jun 28, 2009 9:23 pm

PLEASE DON'T LEAVE ME..... :lol:

Khoee · Post #10 » by **Khoee** » Sun Jun 28, 2009 9:24 pm

this is consistent with what I heard and reported last night...goodluck Suns fans...

pidi · Post #11 » by **pidi** » Sun Jun 28, 2009 9:25 pm

this one was just for you IHG - think twice :bowdown:

RaisingArizona · Post #12 » by **RaisingArizona** » Sun Jun 28, 2009 9:25 pm

Khoee wrote:this is consistent with what I heard and reported last night...goodluck Suns fans...

We'll be fine without your average players. We still have two all stars on our roster. Unfortunately all you have is "potential".

rly723 · Post #13 » by **rly723** » Sun Jun 28, 2009 9:26 pm

so i guess that ends speculation...NEITHER teamexpected curry to be there and Hill wouldve been they guy

LOL knicks fans must feel the worst...curry wouldve been there

pidi · Post #14 » by **pidi** » Sun Jun 28, 2009 9:27 pm

Khoee wrote:this is consistent with what I heard and reported last night...goodluck Suns fans...

don´t come around and troll on our board - i start to realy hate the warriors.

hunterxaz · Post #15 » by **hunterxaz** » Sun Jun 28, 2009 9:28 pm

it's ok, the warriors haven't been as good as the suns have the past 5 years so who cares? we've had a better time. this season the suns will still be better than the warriors, too. so who cares?

Vernon Maxwell · Post #16 » by **Vernon Maxwell** » Sun Jun 28, 2009 9:31 pm

so they reneged on the deal?

fsck the Ws, time to let it leak to the media dunleavy-style.

NW · Post #17 » by NW » Sun Jun 28, 2009 9:34 pm

ginobiliflops wrote:
Khoee wrote:this is consistent with what I heard and reported last night...goodluck Suns fans...

We'll be fine without your average players. We still have two all stars on our roster. Unfortunately all you have is "potential".

Last I checked, both teams were chilling in Seacaucus NJ during the playoffs - and you had 3 all-stars then.

So a little less of the "holier than thou" if you don't mind.

Again, I didn't see any analyst who commented on the proposed trade that didn't say that it wasn't lopsided in the Suns favor with Curry (never mind Randolph) included. Same as they said it was loopsided in the Warriors favor without them.

If talks have ended (and i don't beleive they have - no disrespect to your source) it was become there couldn't be a medium found

rly723 · Post #18 » by **rly723** » Sun Jun 28, 2009 9:34 pm

hunterxaz wrote:it's ok, the warriors haven't been as good as the suns have the past 5 years so who cares? we've had a better time. this season the suns will still be better than the warriors, too. so who cares?

lol we know the warriors arebad, but thats irrelevant right now. suns aint getting curry/randolph and they will not get a better offer than biedrins/wright/belinelli/buke...dont be surprised they go to raptor and ignite bosh talks. they have more of a need for those warriors guards that could interest them

NW · Post #19 » by NW » Sun Jun 28, 2009 9:36 pm

Vernon Maxwell wrote:so they reneged on the deal?

fsck the Ws, time to let it leak to the media dunleavy-style.

Kind of interesting that only Suns sources seem to be reporting a deal was in place. All reports that day was the 7 pick was still being haggled over when the draft began.

Khoee · Post #20 » by **Khoee** » Sun Jun 28, 2009 9:39 pm

pidi wrote:
Khoee wrote:this is consistent with what I heard and reported last night...goodluck Suns fans...

don´t come around and troll on our board - i start to realy hate the warriors.

I took a lot of heat when I reported this last night from IHG, members of the Suns board, and members of the W's board...turns out the information was 100% correct...