REDDzone wrote:Ugh, was hoping the ufc was getting away from that. The worst part is that they seem to be doing rematches for decisive victories and finishes as opposed to close or controversial fights. Seriously, Dillashaw/Cruz was one of the closest fights ever and Lawler/Condit was downright controversial. Doesn't seem like either of those rematches will happen right away.
Meanwhile Aldo/Conor, Tate/Holm, Weidman/Rockhold and Cain/Werdum were all finishes and decisive and scheduled for immediate rematches.
I don't get what they're doing.
Seems backwards to me to. Especially Dillashaw/Cruz because Faber? meh. Assunção been hurt, etc, there's no one else that is super deserving. To be fair, Weidman only got it because Romero tested positive. I thought Condit won, but I didn't think he deserved the shot in the first place, so that's a bit of a tough one for me.
REDDzone wrote:He wouldn't get it in my ideal world. Then again I was arguing here back in the day that Anderson didn't deserve an immediate rematch with Weidman so I'm more extreme than most about this.
I agree, I don't think being a long time champ should get you a rematch. Rematch should be for controversial fights or for really close ones and there's not another great option. Just in general, matchmaking being at the whim of the promoter is one of my biggest gripes with MMA, it's just not an issue in team sports (or most individual sports, like wrestling, tennis, golf, whatever).