WWE SmackDown Discussion II
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
- iMoreland
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,481
- And1: 2,968
- Joined: Jan 23, 2014
-
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
Randy Orton = still a mega star
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,865
- And1: 3,879
- Joined: Jun 16, 2015
-
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
iMoreland wrote:Randy Orton = still a mega star
When he actually can be bothered (which is roughly once a year).
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,865
- And1: 3,879
- Joined: Jun 16, 2015
-
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
Anyway, can the McMahon's go away, please, let us go back to the days of Jack Tunney if we have to, just enough with the Mcmahon's being all over the product or at least a GM like Teddy Long who only comes out when things go to hell (best GM WWE has had in the last 20 years)
Also of course they'd ruin Almas vs Mysterio with a no contest, i mean in one way, i don't mind because it should be at wrestlemania with a stip, but if this was the plan, they should have just not done it at all and had a tag team match.
Also of course they'd ruin Almas vs Mysterio with a no contest, i mean in one way, i don't mind because it should be at wrestlemania with a stip, but if this was the plan, they should have just not done it at all and had a tag team match.
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,865
- And1: 3,879
- Joined: Jun 16, 2015
-
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
improper wrote:Stanford wrote:Scott Hall wrote:Whatever happened to red blooded males liking good looking women in lingerie? Why is this considered a bad thing?
When did everybody become so soft?
We have access to more free porn than we could ever view in a thousand lifetimes. We don't need wrestling to get off anymore.
Personally, I'm fine with WWE having sexually suggestive content, but I need it to make sense and serve a purpose. Game of Thrones has a ton of gratuitous sex scenes, but they at least use them to dump exposition, world build, and push the narrative forward. The Rose segment was dumb, and the Bliss one was completely pointless.
This, i think if it was used as an actual tactic in feuds where the wrestlers know they can't win so they'll use other tactics to go over, or if they're managers they'll entice the men in some ways.
Like you can have the legit wrestlers (i.e. Ronda, Becky, Charlotte, Sasha, Bayley, Baszler, Moon, Asuka etc) getting the long matches and Natalya, Naomi, Riott Squad filling out the division, then if you have Bliss, Mandy, Carmella (i.e. those who are more sports entertainers) doing some divaish spots from time to time, then that's not bad either, as long as its done with nuance and serves a purpose to further an angle.
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
- tugs
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,912
- And1: 3,003
- Joined: Jul 22, 2010
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
Exactly. Like the Debra's, the Torrie's, and Candice's of the world. But I don't think we have those anymore. Last would be Eva Marie. Potential fillers for that role are the Victoria's, Eve's who can at least wrestle, but look awkward when doing something sexual. Mandy, Alexa, and Lana are the only ones and they are in that tier.
Also, I didn't mind the Vince cameo. He wasn't needed there for the story to proceed, but it does tell you something when the boss gets insults from wrestlers who aren't his cup of tea. Tells me he's at least trying.
Also, I didn't mind the Vince cameo. He wasn't needed there for the story to proceed, but it does tell you something when the boss gets insults from wrestlers who aren't his cup of tea. Tells me he's at least trying.
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
- iMoreland
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,481
- And1: 2,968
- Joined: Jan 23, 2014
-
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
Spoiler:
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,775
- And1: 8,180
- Joined: Feb 06, 2006
-
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
iMoreland wrote:Randy Orton = still a mega star
I've been always been bored to tears with anything he's done. As bland as it gets.
Do it for Chuck
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,865
- And1: 3,879
- Joined: Jun 16, 2015
-
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
iMoreland wrote:Spoiler:
Spoiler:
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,865
- And1: 3,879
- Joined: Jun 16, 2015
-
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
jakecronus8 wrote:iMoreland wrote:Randy Orton = still a mega star
I've been always been bored to tears with anything he's done. As bland as it gets.
That time when he just left Evolution, 07 Legend Killer (him vs RVD and him vs Micheals) and 09 McMahon killer runs (especially when he punted McMahon in the head, hard) where really good (though his 09 run probably was his last really good stretch i'd say).
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,865
- And1: 3,879
- Joined: Jun 16, 2015
-
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
Just to prove that Vince truly has lost his mind, according to the Meltz, he banned 'Wichita' hence why Becky said town (didn't even notice in truth). Out of all the things to micro manage on
apparently Wichita wasn't 'metropolitan' enough for him hence this change.

Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,521
- And1: 4,405
- Joined: May 23, 2014
-
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
Spens1 wrote:Just to prove that Vince truly has lost his mind, according to the Meltz, he banned 'Wichita' hence why Becky said town (didn't even notice in truth). Out of all the things to micro manage onapparently Wichita wasn't 'metropolitan' enough for him hence this change.
This has been a thing for years with WWE. If Vince doesn't think the city they're performing in is worth mentioning, he'll make sure it's glossed over on the live broadcast. This has often been the case for Smackdown shows, especially before the brand split when it was the clear B show and just a crappier rehash of Raw storylines, as Smackdown tends to tour in smaller cities than Raw.
I find it more silly than anything. Like, god forbid the mighty WWE should have to perform a televised show in Wichita.
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 23,518
- And1: 62,706
- Joined: May 04, 2015
- Location: T-Dot
-
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
improper wrote:Spens1 wrote:Just to prove that Vince truly has lost his mind, according to the Meltz, he banned 'Wichita' hence why Becky said town (didn't even notice in truth). Out of all the things to micro manage onapparently Wichita wasn't 'metropolitan' enough for him hence this change.
This has been a thing for years with WWE. If Vince doesn't think the city they're performing in is worth mentioning, he'll make sure it's glossed over on the live broadcast. This has often been the case for Smackdown shows, especially before the brand split when it was the clear B show and just a crappier rehash of Raw storylines, as Smackdown tends to tour in smaller cities than Raw.
I find it more silly than anything. Like, god forbid the mighty WWE should have to perform a televised show in Wichita.
Yeah Vince is the king of silliness... I remember in the mid 2000's he thought that American fans won't cheer for
Canadian babyfaces all of a sudden (not like Bret Hart wasn't one of their most over wrestlers in the 90's)
So all of a sudden instead of Chris Jericho being from Winnipeg he was now introduced from "Manhasset New York"
because he was born there when his dad was playing for the New York Rangers.
Chris Benoit went from being from Edmonton to Atlanta Georgia because he relocated there when he was in WCW...
And I think they may have changed Edge and Christian from being from Toronto to Tampa Florida. I can't remember
if they did it for Trish or Gail Kim and some of the others but it was beyond absurd and made zero sense. I can't
remember how long it lasted maybe a year or 2 until they changed it back.
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,521
- And1: 4,405
- Joined: May 23, 2014
-
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
Scott Hall wrote:Yeah Vince is the king of silliness... I remember in the mid 2000's he thought that American fans won't cheer for
Canadian babyfaces all of a sudden (not like Bret Hart wasn't one of their most over wrestlers in the 90's)
So all of a sudden instead of Chris Jericho being from Winnipeg he was now introduced from "Manhasset New York"
because he was born there when his dad was playing for the New York Rangers.
Chris Benoit went from being from Edmonton to Atlanta Georgia because he relocated there when he was in WCW...
And I think they may have changed Edge and Christian from being from Toronto to Tampa Florida. I can't remember
if they did it for Trish or Gail Kim and some of the others but it was beyond absurd and made zero sense. I can't
remember how long it lasted maybe a year or 2 until they changed it back.
Yeah, Vince may be a billionaire, but deep down he'll always have that xenophobic carny mentality. US good. Everyone else bad. It's why every heel who wasn't born in the US will, at some point, probably have an anti-American gimmick in WWE. Hell, I remember a time a year or so ago when Smackdown had three of them at the same damn time!
It's one of those things that probably worked really well back in the day when the Cold War was raging and the world was a lot bigger than it is now. Today it just feels lame and lazy.
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
- tugs
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,912
- And1: 3,003
- Joined: Jul 22, 2010
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
Obvious fan favorites turned heel again, damn.
Elias and now Rusev. Why can't they capitalize people wanting to walk with Elias and celebrate Rusev Day?!
Elias and now Rusev. Why can't they capitalize people wanting to walk with Elias and celebrate Rusev Day?!
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
- iMoreland
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,481
- And1: 2,968
- Joined: Jan 23, 2014
-
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
R Truth as US champion, whelp, can't be worse than Nakamura's reign
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
- tugs
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,912
- And1: 3,003
- Joined: Jul 22, 2010
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
I agree. Well deserved reward for Truth imo. How this proceeds, I have no idea.
Nakamura and Rusev teaming up hopefully isn't a rehash of The Bar.
Nakamura and Rusev teaming up hopefully isn't a rehash of The Bar.
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
- heatwillbeback
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,818
- And1: 13,875
- Joined: Jul 26, 2003
-
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
God Bryan is so good.
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,775
- And1: 8,180
- Joined: Feb 06, 2006
-
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
I think people that buy replica belts are f*cking dorks, but dear God, that new Bryan belt is so f*cking amazing I'd consider it. 

Do it for Chuck
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
- iMoreland
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,481
- And1: 2,968
- Joined: Jan 23, 2014
-
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
Lmao, I love vegan Daniel Bryan, that new title isn't that bad either.
But WHERE'S LUKE HARPER?
But WHERE'S LUKE HARPER?
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
- iMoreland
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,481
- And1: 2,968
- Joined: Jan 23, 2014
-
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
Samoa Joe is the best promo in wrestling