STRATEGY IF WE GET THE # 1 ?
Re: STRATEGY IF WE GET THE # 1 ?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 24,085
- And1: 1,084
- Joined: Feb 19, 2005
- Location: "Look at me, Dave, look. Come and touch it, Dave."
Re: STRATEGY IF WE GET THE # 1 ?
Kind of, except Griffin will probably be more of a consistent rebounder while Beasley will be more of a 20-25 ppg threat. I compare him to a cross between Marion (ball handling, speed) and Stoudemire (power, authoritative dunking) while also being sandwiched between those two size wise.
Re: STRATEGY IF WE GET THE # 1 ?
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 4,942
- And1: 30
- Joined: Jul 18, 2006
Re: STRATEGY IF WE GET THE # 1 ?
dj3ptkilla wrote:The NBA owes us the number 1 pick for fixing the Lakers series and I don't care if some people don't believe in what Donaghy said or that the NBA fixed that series they did. They fixed the 1985 draft involving the kings isn't it our time finally David Stern. It's not our fault the Knicks suck and each time you give them high picks they make dumb choices. It's our time now and for our struggles we deserve the number 1 pick and Griffin. If not give us the number 2 so we can have Rubio. No 3 no 4 pick we will get the number 1 pick in my eyes and at the very least the number 2 pick i'm confident in that. Write it down.
The league hates us, all the more reason to give us the 4th pick.
I'm just not confident at all in expecting a top two pick.
For the league
Wash, OKC, NYK, NJN is all more profitable than Sacramento getting the top pick.
If it is fixed, we are screwed
Re: STRATEGY IF WE GET THE # 1 ?
- Wolfay
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 7,656
- And1: 649
- Joined: Aug 13, 2005
- Location: Sacramento, CA
-