ImageImageImageImageImage

STRATEGY IF WE GET THE # 1 ?

Moderators: KF10, codydaze

SacKingZZZ
RealGM
Posts: 24,085
And1: 1,084
Joined: Feb 19, 2005
Location: "Look at me, Dave, look. Come and touch it, Dave."

Re: STRATEGY IF WE GET THE # 1 ? 

Post#41 » by SacKingZZZ » Sat May 2, 2009 6:03 am

Kind of, except Griffin will probably be more of a consistent rebounder while Beasley will be more of a 20-25 ppg threat. I compare him to a cross between Marion (ball handling, speed) and Stoudemire (power, authoritative dunking) while also being sandwiched between those two size wise.
deNIEd
Banned User
Posts: 4,942
And1: 30
Joined: Jul 18, 2006

Re: STRATEGY IF WE GET THE # 1 ? 

Post#42 » by deNIEd » Sat May 2, 2009 11:36 pm

dj3ptkilla wrote:The NBA owes us the number 1 pick for fixing the Lakers series and I don't care if some people don't believe in what Donaghy said or that the NBA fixed that series they did. They fixed the 1985 draft involving the kings isn't it our time finally David Stern. It's not our fault the Knicks suck and each time you give them high picks they make dumb choices. It's our time now and for our struggles we deserve the number 1 pick and Griffin. If not give us the number 2 so we can have Rubio. No 3 no 4 pick we will get the number 1 pick in my eyes and at the very least the number 2 pick i'm confident in that. Write it down.


The league hates us, all the more reason to give us the 4th pick.

I'm just not confident at all in expecting a top two pick.

For the league
Wash, OKC, NYK, NJN is all more profitable than Sacramento getting the top pick.

If it is fixed, we are screwed
User avatar
Wolfay
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 7,656
And1: 649
Joined: Aug 13, 2005
Location: Sacramento, CA
       

Re: STRATEGY IF WE GET THE # 1 ? 

Post#43 » by Wolfay » Sun May 3, 2009 3:26 am

deNIEd sure likes to spread the doom and gloom.
Image

Return to Sacramento Kings