ImageImageImageImageImage

Kings General Discussion 2019-2020

Moderators: KF10, codydaze

User avatar
blind prophet
RealGM
Posts: 10,574
And1: 3,306
Joined: Dec 08, 2011
 

Re: Kings General Discussion 2019-2020 

Post#161 » by blind prophet » Fri Oct 25, 2019 7:31 pm

BoogieTime wrote:I don’t believe it, this is how rumors get made. McMahon and Windhorst stuttering for conversation material making inferences, and Feldman running with it with nothing better to cover or to continue the anti Kings bit

Need something more substantial for me. BOgi has been nothing but complimentary


I believe it, look at his sometimes selfish play.

Besides that going into RFA after doing well with more minutes somewhere else would likely lead to a better contract.
BoogieTime
General Manager
Posts: 8,345
And1: 3,042
Joined: Feb 09, 2017
 

Re: Kings General Discussion 2019-2020 

Post#162 » by BoogieTime » Sat Oct 26, 2019 9:06 am

I don’t like talking about Luka, as what’s done is done, except within the context of accountability. This, and the initial returns on the coaching change and signings, and it hasn’t been a top very start of the season for Vlade (after a contentious career, in my view). But those are initial returns, we’ll see how the season progresses
User avatar
blind prophet
RealGM
Posts: 10,574
And1: 3,306
Joined: Dec 08, 2011
 

Re: Kings General Discussion 2019-2020 

Post#163 » by blind prophet » Sat Oct 26, 2019 1:59 pm

We need to beat Utah somehow. Fox being questionable, not likely.
oldshoolballer
Veteran
Posts: 2,601
And1: 3,208
Joined: Nov 24, 2018

Re: Kings General Discussion 2019-2020 

Post#164 » by oldshoolballer » Sat Oct 26, 2019 4:51 pm

SmellingColors wrote:Bagley looked pretty average in preseason and awful against the Suns. He's got tunnel vision so bad when he has the ball. I think they'll end up playing better without him for a few games, but the obviously won't work long term. Overall, that first game was terrible and not a good sign. It's only the first game, but then you look at the next 10 or so and we could easily start the year about 2-10 if we don't lock in quick. Portland, Jazz, Denver, Lakers are all on the schedule.

I had high hopes for Bagley So far I'm a little disappointed.Still early hopefully he will keep working hard but I thought he would be better than he's showing so far.
SmellingColors
Pro Prospect
Posts: 760
And1: 139
Joined: Dec 14, 2010

Re: Kings General Discussion 2019-2020 

Post#165 » by SmellingColors » Sat Oct 26, 2019 10:32 pm

oldshoolballer wrote:
SmellingColors wrote:Bagley looked pretty average in preseason and awful against the Suns. He's got tunnel vision so bad when he has the ball. I think they'll end up playing better without him for a few games, but the obviously won't work long term. Overall, that first game was terrible and not a good sign. It's only the first game, but then you look at the next 10 or so and we could easily start the year about 2-10 if we don't lock in quick. Portland, Jazz, Denver, Lakers are all on the schedule.

I had high hopes for Bagley So far I'm a little disappointed.Still early hopefully he will keep working hard but I thought he would be better than he's showing so far.


Me too. I still think he has a lot of potential, but right now it seems like he's not ready for what this team expects of him. Maybe a little time on the bench will give him some learning opportunities too.

I mentioned last year that I would have liked for us to go after Oubre. I stand by that opinion. Dude has fire and swag which we are lacking. Others have mentioned bringing Shump back too.
bleeds_purple
Analyst
Posts: 3,530
And1: 1,809
Joined: May 22, 2014

Re: Kings General Discussion 2019-2020 

Post#166 » by bleeds_purple » Sun Oct 27, 2019 1:56 am

Strange to see almost no fast breaks through 2.5 games.
Lost in LA
Pro Prospect
Posts: 873
And1: 188
Joined: Jul 09, 2016
       

Re: Kings General Discussion 2019-2020 

Post#167 » by Lost in LA » Sun Oct 27, 2019 3:03 am

Joerger looking good right now...
BoogieTime
General Manager
Posts: 8,345
And1: 3,042
Joined: Feb 09, 2017
 

Re: Kings General Discussion 2019-2020 

Post#168 » by BoogieTime » Sun Oct 27, 2019 7:32 am

I hope we see now my favoritism for hard nosed coaches as opposed to players coaches.. hard nosed coaches get the most out of talent by will, whereas you need a self containing team, like the warriors and Kerr for example, that doesn’t need that foot to the behind on a daily basis
User avatar
gom
Heat forum: Expert Predictor
Posts: 18,594
And1: 42,676
Joined: May 30, 2014
Location: Earth-616
   

Re: Kings General Discussion 2019-2020 

Post#169 » by gom » Sun Oct 27, 2019 2:08 pm

I liked what Joerger did in Sacramento and was against letting him go, but Kings fans have turned on Kerr way too quickly. It's only been three games, and the only surprising loss was to the Suns. Overreaction.
Image
I remember 11-30 with these guys. ^
BoogieTime
General Manager
Posts: 8,345
And1: 3,042
Joined: Feb 09, 2017
 

Re: Kings General Discussion 2019-2020 

Post#170 » by BoogieTime » Tue Oct 29, 2019 12:26 am

I think I’ll take a break from the games for a bit. I’m already rooting for lins and disliking a lot of members of the team. Not healthy. But I’ll still discuss basketball and long term personnel issues on the board, just not games for a bit
KF10
Forum Mod - Kings
Forum Mod - Kings
Posts: 25,434
And1: 5,537
Joined: Jul 28, 2006
 

Re: Kings General Discussion 2019-2020 

Post#171 » by KF10 » Tue Oct 29, 2019 7:13 pm

Holmes should be starting over Dedmon.

Dedmon is looking scrub-ish so far.
bleeds_purple
Analyst
Posts: 3,530
And1: 1,809
Joined: May 22, 2014

Re: Kings General Discussion 2019-2020 

Post#172 » by bleeds_purple » Tue Oct 29, 2019 7:55 pm

KF10 wrote:Holmes should be starting over Dedmon.

Dedmon is looking scrub-ish so far.


Hoping we can be running Giles/Bagley and Holmes/Bjelica. But I think we gotta give Dedmon another handful of games to see if he is worth anything. It matters more who finishes than starts anyhow.
KF10
Forum Mod - Kings
Forum Mod - Kings
Posts: 25,434
And1: 5,537
Joined: Jul 28, 2006
 

Re: Kings General Discussion 2019-2020 

Post#173 » by KF10 » Tue Oct 29, 2019 8:03 pm

bleeds_purple wrote:
KF10 wrote:Holmes should be starting over Dedmon.

Dedmon is looking scrub-ish so far.


Hoping we can be running Giles/Bagley and Holmes/Bjelica. But I think we gotta give Dedmon another handful of games to see if he is worth anything. It matters more who finishes than starts anyhow.


Dedmon literally looks like a guy you make in 2K with specific attributes above average i.e. blocking, 3PT and nothing else lol. The guy had one of the worst turnovers I've seen in a while in one of those losses.

That being said, I hope he bounces back. In theory, he is a perfect fit in the starting 5. Strong defender with a 3PT shot. I hope his intangibles shows up though.
BoogieTime
General Manager
Posts: 8,345
And1: 3,042
Joined: Feb 09, 2017
 

Re: Kings General Discussion 2019-2020 

Post#174 » by BoogieTime » Tue Oct 29, 2019 9:21 pm

From the outset I believed Holmes was the center of the future
Lost in LA
Pro Prospect
Posts: 873
And1: 188
Joined: Jul 09, 2016
       

Re: Kings General Discussion 2019-2020 

Post#175 » by Lost in LA » Thu Oct 31, 2019 4:20 am

Awful tonight, we need an actual coach
The Beam King
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,744
And1: 773
Joined: Mar 01, 2006
Location: Sacramento, CA
 

Re: Kings General Discussion 2019-2020 

Post#176 » by The Beam King » Thu Oct 31, 2019 4:50 am

Lost in LA wrote:Awful tonight, we need an actual coach
Bring back joerger

Sent from my SM-N976V using Tapatalk
User avatar
WuTang_OG
RealGM
Posts: 40,577
And1: 51,015
Joined: Sep 26, 2017
   

Re: Kings General Discussion 2019-2020 

Post#177 » by WuTang_OG » Thu Oct 31, 2019 3:54 pm

Vlade should have put his ego aside and worked things out with Joerger at the end of last season. So what he kicked out Brandon Williams from practice and he wasn't starting or giving MB 30+ minutes.

The team was playing with a real identity and were respectable, something the organization lacked since 2006.
BoogieTime
General Manager
Posts: 8,345
And1: 3,042
Joined: Feb 09, 2017
 

Re: Kings General Discussion 2019-2020 

Post#178 » by BoogieTime » Thu Oct 31, 2019 7:54 pm

Maybe it’s just a master plan.

Firing Joerger and hiring Walton tanks the team for high draft picks instead of treadmill for two years. Than Vlade/Walton fired

2 years from now we have high draft picks with our core with a better GM. Still, the master plan would require hiring a coach as good as Joerger in two years, don’t know if it’s possible
SmellingColors
Pro Prospect
Posts: 760
And1: 139
Joined: Dec 14, 2010

Re: Kings General Discussion 2019-2020 

Post#179 » by SmellingColors » Thu Oct 31, 2019 11:05 pm

WuTang_OG wrote:Vlade should have put his ego aside and worked things out with Joerger at the end of last season. So what he kicked out Brandon Williams from practice and he wasn't starting or giving MB 30+ minutes.

The team was playing with a real identity and were respectable, something the organization lacked since 2006.


I wasn't mad about the Joerger firing because I was thinking we were looking at moving up a tier in quality of coaches...then they hired Luke who is (at best) in the same tier as Joerger. Now he doesn't even look like that. Vlade has now tied his fate to Luke's success in my opinion by saying everything he said about Luke. I hope Vivek has the balls to move on from Vlade if Luke doesn't turn this around because these games have been atrocious.
sacking123
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,464
And1: 1,348
Joined: Jul 23, 2004
Location: Office
Contact:
 

Re: Kings General Discussion 2019-2020 

Post#180 » by sacking123 » Fri Nov 1, 2019 9:35 am

Well it looks like any expectations we had prior to the season are well off.
Did the play prior to the AS break flatter this team?
I mean after the break we went 9-16. On three occasions we had a 3 game losing streak, including the last 3 games of the season, which obviously means the Kings have lost 8 straight RS games.

In that span there have been 1 major change and 1 constant.

Shump out and Barnes in and Fox playing hurt.

There are other factors of course, namely the roster changes (do the vets fit the culture we had going?) and coaching change.
The thing I’m not happy about with Luke is the fact he clearly doesn’t have an offensive scheme and the pace isn’t where it needs to be. On top of that he said our conditioning isn’t where it should be. Well then heads should roll if that’s the case.
Why isn’t anyone asking the tough questions on our start? It’s not acceptable to say we need patience to learn new systems etc when other teams have had more player turnover and a new coach and they have systems running well straight out of the gate, like they should.


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
Sacramento Kings
Sydney Kings

Return to Sacramento Kings