Hansen Yang

Draft talk all year round

Moderators: Duke4life831, Marcus

User avatar
azcatz11
RealGM
Posts: 30,016
And1: 34,041
Joined: Apr 13, 2017
Location: Phoenix
   

Re: Hansen Yang 

Post#121 » by azcatz11 » Thu Jun 26, 2025 6:39 pm

EvanZ wrote:
azcatz11 wrote:
JRoy wrote:
So is Detroit.


Okay let’s brush aside from the hostility and ask why they took this kid who was a second rounder and not trade back?


I had a first round grade on him. I assume other teams did as well. The answer is they liked him a lot.


Vecenie questioned the pick also. Where on your big board was he? He’s frail and weak. He has no bend. He’s just a good passer
User avatar
EvanZ
RealGM
Posts: 14,557
And1: 4,039
Joined: Apr 06, 2011

Re: Hansen Yang 

Post#122 » by EvanZ » Thu Jun 26, 2025 6:45 pm

azcatz11 wrote:
EvanZ wrote:
azcatz11 wrote:
Okay let’s brush aside from the hostility and ask why they took this kid who was a second rounder and not trade back?


I had a first round grade on him. I assume other teams did as well. The answer is they liked him a lot.


Vecenie questioned the pick also. Where on your big board was he? He’s frail and weak. He has no bend. He’s just a good passer


I mean people disagree. You didn't think Fears was a legit NBA prospect and he just went #7. Vecenie has tons of bizarre takes all the time. He had Podz going second round. Didn't think he was an NBA player. How do you not understand that? Do you really think that only your opinion matters?

To answer your question I had Hansen 25. 16 is a bit high for me but it's not shocking at all. I was much more surprised by Yanic Konan Niederhauser going in the first round.
Subscribe to my 100% FREE email newsletter summarizing top college performances:

https://toplines.mailchimpsites.com/
User avatar
azcatz11
RealGM
Posts: 30,016
And1: 34,041
Joined: Apr 13, 2017
Location: Phoenix
   

Re: Hansen Yang 

Post#123 » by azcatz11 » Thu Jun 26, 2025 6:50 pm

EvanZ wrote:
azcatz11 wrote:
EvanZ wrote:
I had a first round grade on him. I assume other teams did as well. The answer is they liked him a lot.


Vecenie questioned the pick also. Where on your big board was he? He’s frail and weak. He has no bend. He’s just a good passer


I mean people disagree. You didn't think Fears was a legit NBA prospect and he just went #7. Vecenie has tons of bizarre takes all the time. He had Podz going second round. Didn't think he was an NBA player. How do you not understand that? Do you really think that only your opinion matters?

To answer your question I had Hansen 25. 16 is a bit high for me but it's not shocking at all. I was much more surprised by Yanic Konan Niederhauser going in the first round.


I only saw him at the combine. The passing is there but he’s flat footed and can’t move at all. Do you think he’s a rim protector because he led the cba in blocks? Motown Hoops had him in the 40s. I am curious to see how it works for Portland and how he looks in SL
King Ken
General Manager
Posts: 9,773
And1: 5,478
Joined: Jul 01, 2014
   

Re: Hansen Yang 

Post#124 » by King Ken » Thu Jun 26, 2025 6:58 pm

azcatz11 wrote:
EvanZ wrote:
azcatz11 wrote:
Vecenie questioned the pick also. Where on your big board was he? He’s frail and weak. He has no bend. He’s just a good passer


I mean people disagree. You didn't think Fears was a legit NBA prospect and he just went #7. Vecenie has tons of bizarre takes all the time. He had Podz going second round. Didn't think he was an NBA player. How do you not understand that? Do you really think that only your opinion matters?

To answer your question I had Hansen 25. 16 is a bit high for me but it's not shocking at all. I was much more surprised by Yanic Konan Niederhauser going in the first round.


I only saw him at the combine. The passing is there but he’s flat footed and can’t move at all. Do you think he’s a rim protector because he led the cba in blocks? Motown Hoops had him in the 40s. I am curious to see how it works for Portland and how he looks in SL

In all fairness, he could have been dealing with jet lag. When I watched his CBA film. I saw some good and a lot of bad but the good had me think he could be a top 10 center in 4 years if it all pans out. Tier 5 for me. Too far from being NBA ready.
BigGargamel
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,120
And1: 10,769
Joined: Jan 28, 2020
Contact:
     

Re: Hansen Yang 

Post#125 » by BigGargamel » Thu Jun 26, 2025 7:01 pm

Slight reach maybe, but I had him at the very end of the first round during my last mock, so not that terrible. Once you get past the top 10 or 12 whats the point of trading down to get a second round pick or something and perhaps miss out on some guy you want? Pick 16 or pick 30, who really cares.
User avatar
azcatz11
RealGM
Posts: 30,016
And1: 34,041
Joined: Apr 13, 2017
Location: Phoenix
   

Re: Hansen Yang 

Post#126 » by azcatz11 » Thu Jun 26, 2025 7:15 pm

King Ken wrote:
azcatz11 wrote:
EvanZ wrote:
I mean people disagree. You didn't think Fears was a legit NBA prospect and he just went #7. Vecenie has tons of bizarre takes all the time. He had Podz going second round. Didn't think he was an NBA player. How do you not understand that? Do you really think that only your opinion matters?

To answer your question I had Hansen 25. 16 is a bit high for me but it's not shocking at all. I was much more surprised by Yanic Konan Niederhauser going in the first round.


I only saw him at the combine. The passing is there but he’s flat footed and can’t move at all. Do you think he’s a rim protector because he led the cba in blocks? Motown Hoops had him in the 40s. I am curious to see how it works for Portland and how he looks in SL

In all fairness, he could have been dealing with jet lag. When I watched his CBA film. I saw some good and a lot of bad but the good had me think he could be a top 10 center in 4 years if it all pans out. Tier 5 for me. Too far from being NBA ready.


Would you rather have yang or queen
User avatar
EvanZ
RealGM
Posts: 14,557
And1: 4,039
Joined: Apr 06, 2011

Re: Hansen Yang 

Post#127 » by EvanZ » Thu Jun 26, 2025 7:30 pm

azcatz11 wrote:
EvanZ wrote:
azcatz11 wrote:
Vecenie questioned the pick also. Where on your big board was he? He’s frail and weak. He has no bend. He’s just a good passer


I mean people disagree. You didn't think Fears was a legit NBA prospect and he just went #7. Vecenie has tons of bizarre takes all the time. He had Podz going second round. Didn't think he was an NBA player. How do you not understand that? Do you really think that only your opinion matters?

To answer your question I had Hansen 25. 16 is a bit high for me but it's not shocking at all. I was much more surprised by Yanic Konan Niederhauser going in the first round.


I only saw him at the combine. The passing is there but he’s flat footed and can’t move at all. Do you think he’s a rim protector because he led the cba in blocks? Motown Hoops had him in the 40s. I am curious to see how it works for Portland and how he looks in SL


I just disagree with your eyes. To my eyes he moves surprisingly well. He's going to protect the rim as much as any giant human would. Is he going to be good enough at all these things? Maybe? But like, that's why we have a Draft my brother in Christ. It's to figure this **** out. Sometimes I'm wrong. Sometimes you're wrong. Sometimes "Motown Hoops" (who the f cares) is wrong. Sometimes Vecenie is wrong. Do you know of anyone who is 100% right all the time about every single prospect and we can call them the "Oracle of the Draft"? I mean if you know of such an entity for the love of god, we would love to know it.

I don't think you do though, because you are often wrong (like about Fears not being an NBA prospect). In the meantime all of us are giving our opinions about what we think, not about what we think you want to hear.
Subscribe to my 100% FREE email newsletter summarizing top college performances:

https://toplines.mailchimpsites.com/
BlazersBroncos
RealGM
Posts: 12,256
And1: 9,797
Joined: Oct 27, 2016

Re: Hansen Yang 

Post#128 » by BlazersBroncos » Thu Jun 26, 2025 7:55 pm

FWIW - his athletic testing was arguably better than every C drafted in R1 this year.

Yang - 20yo / 7'2.25 / 7'2.25 WS / 253lbs / 30" Max Vert / 11.79 lane agility / 3.01 shuttle / 3.38 3/4 sprint / 9'3 standing reach
Maluach - 18.75yo / 7'2 / 7'6.75WS / 253lbs / 30" Max Vert / 12.05 lane agility / 3.44 shuttle / 3.50 3/4 sprint / 9'6 standing reach
Queen - 20.5yo / 6'10.5 / 7'0.5 WS / 248lbs / 28" Max Vert / 12.45 lane agility / 3.27 shuttle / 3.52 3/4 sprint / 9'1.5 standing reach
Sorber - 19.5yo / 6'10.5 / 7'6 WS / 263lbs - no athletic testing
Wolf - 21yo / 6'11.75 / 7'2.25 WS / 252lbs / 30" Max Vert / 11.26 lane agility / 2.91 shuttle / 3.51 3/4 sprint / 9'1 standing reach

Not unicorn numbers but for a guy his size he can move. Sorta wild how much better he tested than Maluach. Queen is the plodder here.
King Ken
General Manager
Posts: 9,773
And1: 5,478
Joined: Jul 01, 2014
   

Re: Hansen Yang 

Post#129 » by King Ken » Thu Jun 26, 2025 10:10 pm

azcatz11 wrote:
King Ken wrote:
azcatz11 wrote:
I only saw him at the combine. The passing is there but he’s flat footed and can’t move at all. Do you think he’s a rim protector because he led the cba in blocks? Motown Hoops had him in the 40s. I am curious to see how it works for Portland and how he looks in SL

In all fairness, he could have been dealing with jet lag. When I watched his CBA film. I saw some good and a lot of bad but the good had me think he could be a top 10 center in 4 years if it all pans out. Tier 5 for me. Too far from being NBA ready.


Would you rather have yang or queen

Queen by a significant margin. I believe Queen is a prototype that's much more rare once his shot comes and he's giving the rights to be his team's primary ball handler.
JRoy
RealGM
Posts: 16,416
And1: 13,750
Joined: Feb 27, 2019
 

Re: Hansen Yang 

Post#130 » by JRoy » Fri Jun 27, 2025 2:14 am

King Ken wrote:
azcatz11 wrote:
King Ken wrote:In all fairness, he could have been dealing with jet lag. When I watched his CBA film. I saw some good and a lot of bad but the good had me think he could be a top 10 center in 4 years if it all pans out. Tier 5 for me. Too far from being NBA ready.


Would you rather have yang or queen

Queen by a significant margin. I believe Queen is a prototype that's much more rare once his shot comes and he's giving the rights to be his team's primary ball handler.


You think Queen is going to be a primary ball handler?
Edrees wrote:
JRoy wrote:Monta Ellis have it all


I was hoping and expecting this to be one of the first replies. You did not disappoint. Jroy have it all.
User avatar
NO-KG-AI
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 43,929
And1: 19,744
Joined: Jul 19, 2005
Location: The city of witch doctors, and good ol' pickpockets

Re: Hansen Yang 

Post#131 » by NO-KG-AI » Fri Jun 27, 2025 2:39 am

I don’t hate it for Portland. They have two super giants with talent. If one turns into a superstar, he gets big minutes. If both end up just ok, you still have 48 fresh minutes of huge, skilled guys. If one is a total bust, the other plays. In the rare event they both play like stars, move one for a package. If they both bust, it doesn’t matter what position they paid.
Doctor MJ wrote:I don't understand why people jump in a thread and say basically, "This thing you're all talking about. I'm too ignorant to know anything about it. Lollerskates!"
One_and_Done
General Manager
Posts: 8,644
And1: 5,432
Joined: Jun 03, 2023

Re: Hansen Yang 

Post#132 » by One_and_Done » Fri Jun 27, 2025 4:08 am

I agree Vecenie has no idea much of the time, but this still seems like a big reach.
Warspite wrote:Billups was a horrible scorer who could only score with an open corner 3 or a FT.
Blaze the Nugz
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,748
And1: 117
Joined: Jun 17, 2006
Location: San Francisco, CA

Re: Hansen Yang 

Post#133 » by Blaze the Nugz » Fri Jun 27, 2025 5:07 am

azcatz11 wrote:
EvanZ wrote:
azcatz11 wrote:
Vecenie questioned the pick also. Where on your big board was he? He’s frail and weak. He has no bend. He’s just a good passer


I mean people disagree. You didn't think Fears was a legit NBA prospect and he just went #7. Vecenie has tons of bizarre takes all the time. He had Podz going second round. Didn't think he was an NBA player. How do you not understand that? Do you really think that only your opinion matters?

To answer your question I had Hansen 25. 16 is a bit high for me but it's not shocking at all. I was much more surprised by Yanic Konan Niederhauser going in the first round.


I only saw him at the combine. The passing is there but he’s flat footed and can’t move at all. Do you think he’s a rim protector because he led the cba in blocks? Motown Hoops had him in the 40s. I am curious to see how it works for Portland and how he looks in SL

Watch some tape. You'll find that he's shockingly agile in quick little bursts. He can close out on a three point shooter and recover from the blow by to get the block. 16 definitely feels high but that's just because experts who are unaffiliated with NBA teams had him as a second round pick.
User avatar
EvanZ
RealGM
Posts: 14,557
And1: 4,039
Joined: Apr 06, 2011

Re: Hansen Yang 

Post#134 » by EvanZ » Fri Jun 27, 2025 5:24 am

One_and_Done wrote:I agree Vecenie has no idea much of the time, but this still seems like a big reach.


I think Niederhauser was a bigger reach.
Subscribe to my 100% FREE email newsletter summarizing top college performances:

https://toplines.mailchimpsites.com/
King Ken
General Manager
Posts: 9,773
And1: 5,478
Joined: Jul 01, 2014
   

Re: Hansen Yang 

Post#135 » by King Ken » Fri Jun 27, 2025 7:16 am

JRoy wrote:
King Ken wrote:
azcatz11 wrote:
Would you rather have yang or queen

Queen by a significant margin. I believe Queen is a prototype that's much more rare once his shot comes and he's giving the rights to be his team's primary ball handler.


You think Queen is going to be a primary ball handler?

I think he could eventually develop into that. The unseen heliocentric center. His shooting isn't there yet and that's the thing, it's critical to the prototype. You don't have to be a good shooter, just have to do it enough to where it's respectable to setup the dribble drive. What's unique about Queen is once that happens, all other aspects that's already there will blossom even more than what we have seen so far. That's why I am buying Queen as a long term play. For now, he's a solid 6th man. Good offensive player even as a rookie who struggles lots on defense but give it 4 years, he will be a negative on D but closer to net neutral. People have to give both of these players time. They are far from where they could be considering their unique talents.
RollingWave
Starter
Posts: 2,072
And1: 794
Joined: Apr 06, 2006

Re: Hansen Yang 

Post#136 » by RollingWave » Fri Jun 27, 2025 10:10 am

Every year there are consensus top five guys that end up being relatively or total busts and every year there’s at least a few second rounders that end up having a career, so inherently people needs to be humble enough in that teams and experts can easily be wrong, let alone the amateurs

As for Yang we will see, the training programs in China has been poor and the separation gotten further with the us in the last 15-20 years, so if you want to look on the bright side if you’re worried about his athleticism reaching the minimum threshold maybe once he gets into the NBA program it might improve more than you’d think

On the tape his spin moves are pretty legit and he is like Jokic in the sense that he will definitely go at you if you’re just switching a smaller guy on him, in the CBA alot of times he’s guarded by ex NBA guys so you’d think he should be fine against most backup bigs

Given the size and skill you’d think teams will have a hard time just single covering him and once you double the pass really comes into play, offensively I think it’ll work fine as long as you can actually space the floor ok

Defensively the concern is legit but he is 7’2 and certainly not a noodle and his reaction looks a lot faster than Zhou Qi did, if the bar is can he be a backup we need to remember he’s going up against plenty of guys that might end up in China too
The river of time wash away all heroes
User avatar
God Squad
RealGM
Posts: 13,220
And1: 11,387
Joined: Feb 22, 2010
Location: Toronto
 

Re: Hansen Yang 

Post#137 » by God Squad » Fri Jun 27, 2025 3:01 pm

I think he's better than Maluach. Take that as you may.
Image
User avatar
EvanZ
RealGM
Posts: 14,557
And1: 4,039
Joined: Apr 06, 2011

Re: Hansen Yang 

Post#138 » by EvanZ » Fri Jun 27, 2025 4:32 pm

King Ken wrote:
JRoy wrote:
King Ken wrote:Queen by a significant margin. I believe Queen is a prototype that's much more rare once his shot comes and he's giving the rights to be his team's primary ball handler.


You think Queen is going to be a primary ball handler?

I think he could eventually develop into that. The unseen heliocentric center. His shooting isn't there yet and that's the thing, it's critical to the prototype. You don't have to be a good shooter, just have to do it enough to where it's respectable to setup the dribble drive. What's unique about Queen is once that happens, all other aspects that's already there will blossom even more than what we have seen so far. That's why I am buying Queen as a long term play. For now, he's a solid 6th man. Good offensive player even as a rookie who struggles lots on defense but give it 4 years, he will be a negative on D but closer to net neutral. People have to give both of these players time. They are far from where they could be considering their unique talents.


Congrats on describing the career arc of Julius Randle.
Subscribe to my 100% FREE email newsletter summarizing top college performances:

https://toplines.mailchimpsites.com/
ReggiesKnicks
Veteran
Posts: 2,747
And1: 2,267
Joined: Jan 25, 2025
   

Re: Hansen Yang 

Post#139 » by ReggiesKnicks » Fri Jun 27, 2025 4:38 pm

EvanZ wrote:
King Ken wrote:
JRoy wrote:
You think Queen is going to be a primary ball handler?

I think he could eventually develop into that. The unseen heliocentric center. His shooting isn't there yet and that's the thing, it's critical to the prototype. You don't have to be a good shooter, just have to do it enough to where it's respectable to setup the dribble drive. What's unique about Queen is once that happens, all other aspects that's already there will blossom even more than what we have seen so far. That's why I am buying Queen as a long term play. For now, he's a solid 6th man. Good offensive player even as a rookie who struggles lots on defense but give it 4 years, he will be a negative on D but closer to net neutral. People have to give both of these players time. They are far from where they could be considering their unique talents.


Congrats on describing the career arc of Julius Randle.


I think that is King Ken's point. A 1.5" taller Randle and 0.5" longer wingspan.

Julius Randle is a multi-All-NBA and Top 30-50 player in the NBA.
User avatar
EvanZ
RealGM
Posts: 14,557
And1: 4,039
Joined: Apr 06, 2011

Re: Hansen Yang 

Post#140 » by EvanZ » Fri Jun 27, 2025 4:44 pm

ReggiesKnicks wrote:
EvanZ wrote:
King Ken wrote:I think he could eventually develop into that. The unseen heliocentric center. His shooting isn't there yet and that's the thing, it's critical to the prototype. You don't have to be a good shooter, just have to do it enough to where it's respectable to setup the dribble drive. What's unique about Queen is once that happens, all other aspects that's already there will blossom even more than what we have seen so far. That's why I am buying Queen as a long term play. For now, he's a solid 6th man. Good offensive player even as a rookie who struggles lots on defense but give it 4 years, he will be a negative on D but closer to net neutral. People have to give both of these players time. They are far from where they could be considering their unique talents.


Congrats on describing the career arc of Julius Randle.


I think that is King Ken's point. A 1.5" taller Randle and 0.5" longer wingspan.

Julius Randle is a multi-All-NBA and Top 30-50 player in the NBA.


On his 4th team and they still want to trade his ass. But fine, Randle is whatever and he eventually did help a team win. But do you think Julius Randle and Zion Williamson would be a good match playing together?
Subscribe to my 100% FREE email newsletter summarizing top college performances:

https://toplines.mailchimpsites.com/

Return to NBA Draft