Jayson Tatum

Draft talk all year round

Moderators: Marcus, Duke4life831

cedric76
RealGM
Posts: 16,284
And1: 3,741
Joined: May 28, 2005

Re: Jayson Tatum 

Post#261 » by cedric76 » Fri Jun 16, 2017 8:34 am

So to summarise:

If tatum improves his D (which should only be down to will as he has the physical tools for it) and develop a legit 3pt (which shouldn't be a problem when you look at his ft%) , tatum would become a all star?

Sent from my SM-A310F using RealGM mobile app
Suggs, AB, Tyus, Jase
Bane, AB, TDS , Jett
Franz, TDS, Panda
P5, JI, Panda, Moe
Wcj, Goga, Moe
Ettorefm
Head Coach
Posts: 7,391
And1: 5,260
Joined: Aug 08, 2011
Location: São Paulo, Brazil
 

Re: Jayson Tatum 

Post#262 » by Ettorefm » Fri Jun 16, 2017 9:25 pm

cedric76 wrote:So to summarise:

If tatum improves his D (which should only be down to will as he has the physical tools for it) and develop a legit 3pt (which shouldn't be a problem when you look at his ft%) , tatum would become a all star?

Sent from my SM-A310F using RealGM mobile app


Nope.

You should read posts better.
bagsboy wrote:For two hundred years Democrats stole the productive output of slaves and now they seek to enrich themselves with the productive output from the 'rich'. First, Republicans needed to end slavery and next they need to fix taxation with a flat fair tax.
cedric76
RealGM
Posts: 16,284
And1: 3,741
Joined: May 28, 2005

Re: RE: Re: Jayson Tatum 

Post#263 » by cedric76 » Fri Jun 16, 2017 10:11 pm

Ettorefm wrote:
cedric76 wrote:So to summarise:

If tatum improves his D (which should only be down to will as he has the physical tools for it) and develop a legit 3pt (which shouldn't be a problem when you look at his ft%) , tatum would become a all star?

Sent from my SM-A310F using RealGM mobile app


Nope.

You should read posts better.

Lol thx, this was very helpful
Suggs, AB, Tyus, Jase
Bane, AB, TDS , Jett
Franz, TDS, Panda
P5, JI, Panda, Moe
Wcj, Goga, Moe
cedric76
RealGM
Posts: 16,284
And1: 3,741
Joined: May 28, 2005

Re: Jayson Tatum 

Post#264 » by cedric76 » Fri Jun 16, 2017 10:12 pm

Do you think Aaron Gordon and tatum would complement each other

Guard . guard. Tatum.aaron .center

Sent from my SM-A310F using RealGM mobile app
Suggs, AB, Tyus, Jase
Bane, AB, TDS , Jett
Franz, TDS, Panda
P5, JI, Panda, Moe
Wcj, Goga, Moe
User avatar
GimmeDat
Forum Mod - Bulls
Forum Mod - Bulls
Posts: 23,930
And1: 16,927
Joined: Sep 27, 2013
Location: Australia
 

Re: Jayson Tatum 

Post#265 » by GimmeDat » Fri Jun 16, 2017 11:25 pm

cedric76 wrote:Do you think Aaron Gordon and tatum would complement each other

Guard . guard. Tatum.aaron .center

Sent from my SM-A310F using RealGM mobile app


I don't think they're an ideal fit by any stretch, but I think it's a better fit than Isaac, who some Magic fans like.
User avatar
BillyKingGM
Sophomore
Posts: 182
And1: 58
Joined: Jun 08, 2016
     

Re: Tatum 

Post#266 » by BillyKingGM » Sat Jun 17, 2017 11:56 am

The_Hater wrote:
Wilfried wrote:
Ettorefm wrote:
Tobias is the closest comparison IMHO. Of course they're not the same, no two players are equal

He's going to score more than Harris, for sure. And 15 years ago he would be valued as a star. But right now, I don't think he's that valuable.

I know they're not even close regarding skillset, but I feel the same way about tatum that I feel about Jahlil Okafor. They were born too late. Both skillsets and styles are interesting and rare, but exactly what the league is getting rid off.


A skillset is never 'out of date'. You just need to be very good at 1 thing (if you're not a 2-way player). Zach Randolph is a good example. Not a good defender, nor shooter, but 1 of the best inside scorers and rebounders ever. Very efficient.
And Memphis fared pretty well with him.
.


Skill sets can definitely go 'out of date'. The league has has changed drastically in the past 15 years making many big man skills less in demand and many small man skills more in demand.


Things are cyclical. Not everyone can be the Warriors. People think because the Warriors are dominating with this small ball style you can just grab a bunch of shooters and suddenly win 72 games. The warriors are an extremely unique case, and it's not gonna be replicated very easily. If Draymond Green was gone we wouldn't even be talking about small-ball dominating the league, and D Greens don't grow on trees. As more and more teams try to copy the inside outside style, you'll find other areas of the floor open up that are currently well guarded. Just wait until Philly hits their stride. You won't see many teams copying the Warriors in that era.
The_Hater
GHOAT (Greatest Hater Of All Time)
Posts: 85,319
And1: 40,062
Joined: May 23, 2001
     

Re: Tatum 

Post#267 » by The_Hater » Sat Jun 17, 2017 12:49 pm

BillyKingGM wrote:
The_Hater wrote:
Wilfried wrote:
A skillset is never 'out of date'. You just need to be very good at 1 thing (if you're not a 2-way player). Zach Randolph is a good example. Not a good defender, nor shooter, but 1 of the best inside scorers and rebounders ever. Very efficient.
And Memphis fared pretty well with him.
.


Skill sets can definitely go 'out of date'. The league has has changed drastically in the past 15 years making many big man skills less in demand and many small man skills more in demand.


Things are cyclical. Not everyone can be the Warriors. People think because the Warriors are dominating with this small ball style you can just grab a bunch of shooters and suddenly win 72 games. The warriors are an extremely unique case, and it's not gonna be replicated very easily. If Draymond Green was gone we wouldn't even be talking about small-ball dominating the league, and D Greens don't grow on trees. As more and more teams try to copy the inside outside style, you'll find other areas of the floor open up that are currently well guarded. Just wait until Philly hits their stride. You won't see many teams copying the Warriors in that era.


If you think this is cyclical then you're just going to be the last passenger on the train. The league is going to have to make significant rule changes to reverse how the Warriors, Cavs and every playoff level team in the league is playing now and teams still trying to play 'big' are watching the playoffs from home in this era. The skill set teams require from a PF has already changed completely the past 12 years and it appears to be changing in C's now right before our eyes.

Even the team you used as an example, Philly, have Embiid and Saric at te big spots, both of them high volume 3 point shooters and Simmons is a Forward with PG skills more. Bad example to support your point really.
AthensBucks wrote:Lowry is done.
Nurse is below average at best.
Masai is overrated.
I dont get how so many people believe in the raptors,they have zero to chance to win it all.


April 14th, 2019.
User avatar
BillyKingGM
Sophomore
Posts: 182
And1: 58
Joined: Jun 08, 2016
     

Re: RE: Re: Tatum 

Post#268 » by BillyKingGM » Sat Jun 17, 2017 1:49 pm

The_Hater wrote:
BillyKingGM wrote:
The_Hater wrote:
Skill sets can definitely go 'out of date'. The league has has changed drastically in the past 15 years making many big man skills less in demand and many small man skills more in demand.


Things are cyclical. Not everyone can be the Warriors. People think because the Warriors are dominating with this small ball style you can just grab a bunch of shooters and suddenly win 72 games. The warriors are an extremely unique case, and it's not gonna be replicated very easily. If Draymond Green was gone we wouldn't even be talking about small-ball dominating the league, and D Greens don't grow on trees. As more and more teams try to copy the inside outside style, you'll find other areas of the floor open up that are currently well guarded. Just wait until Philly hits their stride. You won't see many teams copying the Warriors in that era.


If you think this is cyclical then you're just going to be the last passenger on the train. The league is going to have to make significant rule changes to reverse how the Warriors, Cavs and every playoff level team in the league is playing now and teams still trying to play 'big' are watching the playoffs from home in this era. The skill set teams require from a PF has already changed completely the past 12 years and it appears to be changing in C's now right before our eyes.

Even the team you used as an example, Philly, have Embiid and Saric at te big spots, both of them high volume 3 point shooters and Simmons is a Forward with PG skills more. Bad example to support your point really.

So you think teams are gonna be able to play small ball against Embiid Saric and Simmons?

Sent from my SM-N920G using Tapatalk
User avatar
dukes_wild
RealGM
Posts: 14,257
And1: 50,145
Joined: Jun 12, 2017
Location: Tyrese Haliburton Fan Club
 

Re: Jayson Tatum 

Post#269 » by dukes_wild » Sat Jun 17, 2017 3:50 pm

cedric76 wrote:Do you think Aaron Gordon and tatum would complement each other

Guard . guard. Tatum.aaron .center

Sent from my SM-A310F using RealGM mobile app


It's a less than ideal forward duo.

Not to say it wouldn't work, but you would for sure need a 3pt specialist at SG (Ross) and a PG who can shoot 3s as-well.

A draft strategy of Tatum at #6, Jawun Evans at #25 (a bit of a reach), Tyler Dorsey at #33 (a reach to most, but I think Dorsey can easily be a rich man's Jordan Clarkson), and finish it off by drafting more PG depth at #35 with either Frank Jackson or Edmond Sumner and I think they are in great shape to really get creative in the off-season by trading Elfrid Payton and Evan Fournier.

Evans / Sumner
Ross / Dorsey / Hezonja
Tatum / Ross / Hezonja
Gordon / free agent PF
Biyombo / Vucevic

That's what their roster could be without even considering what they could get for Payton/Fournier, who I concede aren't very good players, but Payton is making pennies this year and Fournier is still a viable secondary/tertiary option on a good team, he's just had to do too much as the #1 guy on Orlando. His contract is large, but it's not cap killing, it's pretty reasonable when you compare it to some of his peers like Evan Turner, DeMarre Carroll, etc he's better than them by a healthy margin

Though, maybe it's just smarter to take Dennis Smith or De'Aaron Fox whichever is available at #6
Image
Geddy wrote:You're probably scratching your balls and eating cheese puffs

Ice Trae wrote:Is it just me or does Derrick Rose look like Jean Claude Van Damme
User avatar
Effigy
RealGM
Posts: 14,707
And1: 14,076
Joined: Nov 27, 2001
     

Re: Jayson Tatum 

Post#270 » by Effigy » Sat Jun 17, 2017 3:51 pm

cedric76 wrote:Do you think Aaron Gordon and tatum would complement each other

Guard . guard. Tatum.aaron .center

Sent from my SM-A310F using RealGM mobile app


God. The Magic have been rebuilding longer than the Lakers and Gordon is their only notable piece? And he's not much.
Novocaine
Veteran
Posts: 2,572
And1: 1,598
Joined: May 27, 2013

Re: Jayson Tatum 

Post#271 » by Novocaine » Sat Jun 17, 2017 9:58 pm

Ettorefm wrote:
cedric76 wrote:So to summarise:

If tatum improves his D (which should only be down to will as he has the physical tools for it) and develop a legit 3pt (which shouldn't be a problem when you look at his ft%) , tatum would become a all star?

Sent from my SM-A310F using RealGM mobile app


Nope.

You should read posts better.


Why not? Pretty sure he should be at least an All-Star level player in that scenario (which is far from unlikely IMO - Tatum lateral quickness is underrated I think, because he has very sketchy fundamentals. I rarely saw him being beaten due to the lack of lateral speed, it was mostly because he'd put himself in a hole at the start of the play with bad technique/lousy effort. I'm more pessimistic about his shot actually - he has a tendency to fall back which is a nasty habit to correct).
cedric76
RealGM
Posts: 16,284
And1: 3,741
Joined: May 28, 2005

Re: RE: Re: Jayson Tatum 

Post#272 » by cedric76 » Sun Jun 18, 2017 3:44 am

dukes_wild wrote:
cedric76 wrote:Do you think Aaron Gordon and tatum would complement each other

Guard . guard. Tatum.aaron .center

Sent from my SM-A310F using RealGM mobile app


It's a less than ideal forward duo.

Not to say it wouldn't work, but you would for sure need a 3pt specialist at SG (Ross) and a PG who can shoot 3s as-well.

A draft strategy of Tatum at #6, Jawun Evans at #25 (a bit of a reach), Tyler Dorsey at #33 (a reach to most, but I think Dorsey can easily be a rich man's Jordan Clarkson), and finish it off by drafting more PG depth at #35 with either Frank Jackson or Edmond Sumner and I think they are in great shape to really get creative in the off-season by trading Elfrid Payton and Evan Fournier.

Evans / Sumner
Ross / Dorsey / Hezonja
Tatum / Ross / Hezonja
Gordon / free agent PF
Biyombo / Vucevic

That's what their roster could be without even considering what they could get for Payton/Fournier, who I concede aren't very good players, but Payton is making pennies this year and Fournier is still a viable secondary/tertiary option on a good team, he's just had to do too much as the #1 guy on Orlando. His contract is large, but it's not cap killing, it's pretty reasonable when you compare it to some of his peers like Evan Turner, DeMarre Carroll, etc he's better than them by a healthy margin

Though, maybe it's just smarter to take Dennis Smith or De'Aaron Fox whichever is available at #6

Evan is a good 3pt specialist

But I agree on drafting frank jackson if we draft Isaac /tatum

???.ep.dj.frank
Evan.ross.frank
Tatum.mario
AG.VET.#33
Vuc/biz. Zimm
Suggs, AB, Tyus, Jase
Bane, AB, TDS , Jett
Franz, TDS, Panda
P5, JI, Panda, Moe
Wcj, Goga, Moe
Upperclass
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,892
And1: 2,210
Joined: Aug 09, 2005

Re: Jayson Tatum 

Post#273 » by Upperclass » Sun Jun 18, 2017 3:56 am

Headed to the Celts. Great fit
Duke4life831
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 37,078
And1: 67,944
Joined: Jun 16, 2015
 

Re: Jayson Tatum 

Post#274 » by Duke4life831 » Sun Jun 18, 2017 4:02 am

Upperclass wrote:Headed to the Celts. Great fit


I havent kept up with the workouts. Have they worked him out? He definitely is a better fit than Jackson. I think he is the best fit out of all the guys in the top 4 so it definitely makes sense that Boston trade down a couple spots to grab him. If they keep the pick.
Gant
RealGM
Posts: 11,065
And1: 15,674
Joined: Mar 16, 2006

Re: Jayson Tatum 

Post#275 » by Gant » Sun Jun 18, 2017 2:18 pm

Duke4life831 wrote:
Upperclass wrote:Headed to the Celts. Great fit


I havent kept up with the workouts. Have they worked him out? He definitely is a better fit than Jackson. I think he is the best fit out of all the guys in the top 4 so it definitely makes sense that Boston trade down a couple spots to grab him. If they keep the pick.


Yes. They've worked out all the top prospects except Ball and Josh Jackson.
JJtheBricklayer
Junior
Posts: 308
And1: 436
Joined: Jun 18, 2017
       

Re: Jayson Tatum 

Post#276 » by JJtheBricklayer » Mon Jun 19, 2017 1:10 am

I really hope the C's take Tatum at 3, seems like a perfect fit
DirtyDez
Suns Forum College Scout
Posts: 17,180
And1: 6,911
Joined: Jun 25, 2009
Location: the Arizona desert

Re: Jayson Tatum 

Post#277 » by DirtyDez » Mon Jun 19, 2017 2:35 am

How much of Tatum's ISO ball had to do with Duke not really having a PG?
fromthetop321 wrote:I got Lebron number 1, he is also leading defensive player of the year. Curry's game still reminds me of Jeremy Lin to much.
Gant
RealGM
Posts: 11,065
And1: 15,674
Joined: Mar 16, 2006

Re: Jayson Tatum 

Post#278 » by Gant » Mon Jun 19, 2017 8:08 pm

Gant wrote:
Duke4life831 wrote:
Upperclass wrote:Headed to the Celts. Great fit


I havent kept up with the workouts. Have they worked him out? He definitely is a better fit than Jackson. I think he is the best fit out of all the guys in the top 4 so it definitely makes sense that Boston trade down a couple spots to grab him. If they keep the pick.


Yes. They've worked out all the top prospects except Ball and Josh Jackson.


update:
Read on Twitter


The Celtics had previously worked out Tatum, I think in LA.
User avatar
cksdayoff
RealGM
Posts: 13,331
And1: 3,639
Joined: Jun 21, 2010

Re: Jayson Tatum 

Post#279 » by cksdayoff » Mon Jun 19, 2017 11:13 pm

Tatum is like a very poor man's Melo. I think the C's would be making a mistake to draft him at #3.
#failforfultz
cedric76
RealGM
Posts: 16,284
And1: 3,741
Joined: May 28, 2005

Re: Jayson Tatum 

Post#280 » by cedric76 » Tue Jun 20, 2017 11:30 am

I m starting to like tatum at 6th if Isaac is off the board

Sent from my SM-A310F using RealGM mobile app
Suggs, AB, Tyus, Jase
Bane, AB, TDS , Jett
Franz, TDS, Panda
P5, JI, Panda, Moe
Wcj, Goga, Moe

Return to NBA Draft