Cam Whitmore

Draft talk all year round

Moderators: Duke4life831, Marcus

SeattleJazzFan
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,296
And1: 2,697
Joined: Jul 09, 2004
Location: Seattle, WA

Re: Cam Whitmore 

Post#41 » by SeattleJazzFan » Tue Mar 7, 2023 7:56 pm

jman3134 wrote:Whitmore is probably my favorite player in this draft class, not necessarily because of what he is putting on tape at the college level. He has the "it" factor when it comes to assertiveness/mental edge, and has been on record saying the Villanova system has been a lot to learn in year one. Watching Nova's offense, the spacing and ball movement have been awful, so we are not seeing what Cam is truly capable of at the pro level. I understand why some are lower on him - because his physical advantage may not necessarily give him the same edge in the NBA. But, he is the type of player who continues to develop this advantage, while honing in on his handle/dribble set up moves.


bottom line, they are a horribly coached team and as a result Whitmore has been a tough player to evaluate this season. but villanova is incredibly talented and i have to think if jay wright were still there they'd be at about 25 wins right now.
jman3134
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 19,484
And1: 1,328
Joined: Apr 17, 2005
Location: Follow me on Twitter: JTMBasketball
Contact:
 

Re: Cam Whitmore 

Post#42 » by jman3134 » Tue Mar 7, 2023 11:15 pm

I wouldn't say all that. Neptune was Jay's right hand man for a while. I don't like how the team has gelled, but they have had limited time together. You also have a freshman point guard. It is just a tough transition period. Moore is coming off that achilles, so he is still not 100% and he just joined the team. Whitmore himself was not there for early games.

You have to say that the ball movement on this team isn't what you want. I think it is more player chemistry and time spent together. Also, Slater tends to turn down good, open shots. It is a psychological thing.

If they were healthy all season, I think they would be at 25 wins. I also wouldn't completely count them out in the BE Tourney, though I think UConn will win it.
User avatar
clyde21
RealGM
Posts: 63,534
And1: 69,956
Joined: Aug 20, 2014
     

Re: Cam Whitmore 

Post#43 » by clyde21 » Thu Mar 9, 2023 5:20 am

Read on Twitter
The-Power
RealGM
Posts: 10,428
And1: 9,852
Joined: Jan 03, 2014
Location: Germany
   

Re: Cam Whitmore 

Post#44 » by The-Power » Thu Mar 9, 2023 6:18 am

Perhaps his best game of the season. He plays within himself these days and that makes him a lot more efficient on offense, and he's playing good defense, too. His shot also looks really good when he's taking quality 3s which is important.
User avatar
K_chile22
RealGM
Posts: 16,523
And1: 8,454
Joined: Jul 15, 2015
   

Re: Cam Whitmore 

Post#45 » by K_chile22 » Thu Mar 9, 2023 3:46 pm

He can't pass but I'm starting to care less and less about that. He's got "it". If he can create advantages like I think he can the passes he would need to make become way easier
SeattleJazzFan
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,296
And1: 2,697
Joined: Jul 09, 2004
Location: Seattle, WA

Re: Cam Whitmore 

Post#46 » by SeattleJazzFan » Thu Mar 9, 2023 4:50 pm

K_chile22 wrote:He can't pass but I'm starting to care less and less about that. He's got "it". If he can create advantages like I think he can the passes he would need to make become way easier


he has shown flashes as a passer this season but they have been VERY few and far between. this may be the last point your making here, but i think he's a better passer than his subpar ballhandling allows him to show.
User avatar
clyde21
RealGM
Posts: 63,534
And1: 69,956
Joined: Aug 20, 2014
     

Re: Cam Whitmore 

Post#47 » by clyde21 » Thu Mar 9, 2023 5:03 pm

not everyone needs to be a great passer, as long as he can swing and drive/kick he's fine

i think the most obv question is if he's big/long enough to play the 3 in the NBA, if he's not then he's kinda locked at the 2 and then it becomes if he's a good enough shooter long term to scale there, which is the Isaac Okoro equation that leaves him in no man's land.

we'll see what happens at the combine with his measurements but otherwise I think he's largely been underrated and should be a surefire bottom half of lotto guy.
User avatar
K_chile22
RealGM
Posts: 16,523
And1: 8,454
Joined: Jul 15, 2015
   

Re: Cam Whitmore 

Post#48 » by K_chile22 » Thu Mar 9, 2023 5:07 pm

clyde21 wrote:not everyone needs to be a great passer, as long as he can swing and drive/kick he's fine

i think the most obv question is if he's big/long enough to play the 3 in the NBA, if he's not then he's kinda locked at the 2 and then it becomes if he's a good enough shooter long term to scale there, which is the Isaac Okoro equation that leaves him in no man's land.

we'll see what happens at the combine with his measurements but otherwise I think he's largely been underrated and should be a surefire bottom half of lotto guy.

Strength is another way to play up a position, not just length, I'm very confident his NBA position will be the 3.
User avatar
clyde21
RealGM
Posts: 63,534
And1: 69,956
Joined: Aug 20, 2014
     

Re: Cam Whitmore 

Post#49 » by clyde21 » Thu Mar 9, 2023 5:36 pm

K_chile22 wrote:
clyde21 wrote:not everyone needs to be a great passer, as long as he can swing and drive/kick he's fine

i think the most obv question is if he's big/long enough to play the 3 in the NBA, if he's not then he's kinda locked at the 2 and then it becomes if he's a good enough shooter long term to scale there, which is the Isaac Okoro equation that leaves him in no man's land.

we'll see what happens at the combine with his measurements but otherwise I think he's largely been underrated and should be a surefire bottom half of lotto guy.

Strength is another way to play up a position, not just length, I'm very confident his NBA position will be the 3.


that's tbd - everyone thought that about okoro and it wasn't the case, was clearly undersized, and you'd need to have outlier strength to play up a position enough for it to actually be your position.

if he comes in at 6-5 with a 6-8 w/s, that's gonna limit his versatility. that's just a fact.
User avatar
UnbelievablyRAW
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,501
And1: 4,305
Joined: Oct 29, 2011
     

Re: Cam Whitmore 

Post#50 » by UnbelievablyRAW » Thu Mar 9, 2023 7:02 pm

Ngl, I was initially low on dude but he has quickly proved me wrong. Reminds me of Edwards in the first half of his rookie season

I think he needs somewhere with a PG and spacing though. The Jazz would be a great fit for him with the shooters they have
"Above average role player is now being paid like a superstar from one good playoff series. This will end up as one of the worst contracts in the league." paulbball on Pascal Siakam
User avatar
K_chile22
RealGM
Posts: 16,523
And1: 8,454
Joined: Jul 15, 2015
   

Re: Cam Whitmore 

Post#51 » by K_chile22 » Thu Mar 9, 2023 9:56 pm

clyde21 wrote:
K_chile22 wrote:
clyde21 wrote:not everyone needs to be a great passer, as long as he can swing and drive/kick he's fine

i think the most obv question is if he's big/long enough to play the 3 in the NBA, if he's not then he's kinda locked at the 2 and then it becomes if he's a good enough shooter long term to scale there, which is the Isaac Okoro equation that leaves him in no man's land.

we'll see what happens at the combine with his measurements but otherwise I think he's largely been underrated and should be a surefire bottom half of lotto guy.

Strength is another way to play up a position, not just length, I'm very confident his NBA position will be the 3.


that's tbd - everyone thought that about okoro and it wasn't the case, was clearly undersized, and you'd need to have outlier strength to play up a position enough for it to actually be your position.

if he comes in at 6-5 with a 6-8 w/s, that's gonna limit his versatility. that's just a fact.
Well I think the issue there is that Okoro can't just be solid defensively at his position and stay on the floor. He's got to be elite because the offense is horrendous. I don't think Whitmore is going to be some great defender at either spot, but he'll be solid and a really really good offensive player, sure his versatility is hurt but that's because he can't play the four/switch onto bigs as well as he could if he were bigger
SeattleJazzFan
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,296
And1: 2,697
Joined: Jul 09, 2004
Location: Seattle, WA

Re: Cam Whitmore 

Post#52 » by SeattleJazzFan » Thu Mar 9, 2023 11:25 pm

whitmore will measure at just over 6'7" in shoes. the wingspan probably won't be great - it would be nice to see him come in at 6'10 rather than 6'8.
mattao313
General Manager
Posts: 9,587
And1: 4,464
Joined: Aug 29, 2014
       

Re: Cam Whitmore 

Post#53 » by mattao313 » Thu Mar 9, 2023 11:41 pm

SeattleJazzFan wrote:whitmore will measure at just over 6'7" in shoes. the wingspan probably won't be great - it would be nice to see him come in at 6'10 rather than 6'8.
I like him as a prospect but he looks pretty small out there to me.

Sent from my SM-A528B using RealGM mobile app
Championships
Hal14
RealGM
Posts: 20,880
And1: 19,341
Joined: Apr 05, 2019

Re: Cam Whitmore 

Post#54 » by Hal14 » Thu Mar 16, 2023 4:51 pm

clyde21 wrote:
K_chile22 wrote:
clyde21 wrote:not everyone needs to be a great passer, as long as he can swing and drive/kick he's fine

i think the most obv question is if he's big/long enough to play the 3 in the NBA, if he's not then he's kinda locked at the 2 and then it becomes if he's a good enough shooter long term to scale there, which is the Isaac Okoro equation that leaves him in no man's land.

we'll see what happens at the combine with his measurements but otherwise I think he's largely been underrated and should be a surefire bottom half of lotto guy.

Strength is another way to play up a position, not just length, I'm very confident his NBA position will be the 3.


that's tbd - everyone thought that about okoro and it wasn't the case, was clearly undersized, and you'd need to have outlier strength to play up a position enough for it to actually be your position.

if he comes in at 6-5 with a 6-8 w/s, that's gonna limit his versatility. that's just a fact.

He's currently listed at 6'7", 232 lbs, a 12.2% rebounding %. Build like a linebacker, strong finisher at the rim but questionable handles and passing. He's closer to being a 4 than he is to being a 2.
1/11/24 The birth of a new Hal. From now on being less combative, avoiding confrontation - like Switzerland :)
User avatar
clyde21
RealGM
Posts: 63,534
And1: 69,956
Joined: Aug 20, 2014
     

Re: Cam Whitmore 

Post#55 » by clyde21 » Thu Mar 16, 2023 5:00 pm

Hal14 wrote:
clyde21 wrote:
K_chile22 wrote:Strength is another way to play up a position, not just length, I'm very confident his NBA position will be the 3.


that's tbd - everyone thought that about okoro and it wasn't the case, was clearly undersized, and you'd need to have outlier strength to play up a position enough for it to actually be your position.

if he comes in at 6-5 with a 6-8 w/s, that's gonna limit his versatility. that's just a fact.

He's currently listed at 6'7", 232 lbs, a 12.2% rebounding %. Build like a linebacker, strong finisher at the rim but questionable handles and passing. He's closer to being a 4 than he is to being a 2.


they can list him at 6-7 all they want he's closer to 6-5 with probably a 6-8 w/s at best, he's essentially the same size as Isaac Okoro and Jaylen Brown (except for the w/s). if those guys aren't 4s then neither is Whitmore.
Hal14
RealGM
Posts: 20,880
And1: 19,341
Joined: Apr 05, 2019

Re: Cam Whitmore 

Post#56 » by Hal14 » Thu Mar 16, 2023 5:20 pm

clyde21 wrote:
Hal14 wrote:
clyde21 wrote:
that's tbd - everyone thought that about okoro and it wasn't the case, was clearly undersized, and you'd need to have outlier strength to play up a position enough for it to actually be your position.

if he comes in at 6-5 with a 6-8 w/s, that's gonna limit his versatility. that's just a fact.

He's currently listed at 6'7", 232 lbs, a 12.2% rebounding %. Build like a linebacker, strong finisher at the rim but questionable handles and passing. He's closer to being a 4 than he is to being a 2.


they can list him at 6-7 all they want he's closer to 6-5 with probably a 6-8 w/s at best, he's essentially the same size as Isaac Okoro and Jaylen Brown (except for the w/s). if those guys aren't 4s then neither is Whitmore.

I go off listed heights until proven otherwise. You say 6'5" with nothing of any substance to base that on.

Players listed with pre-draft weight and college rebounding %
Whitmore 232 lbs, 12.2%
Isaac Okoro 225 lbs, 7.6%
Jaylen Brown 223 lbs, 10.8%
Miles Bridges 225 lbs, 12.5%

Looking at this, Whitmore compares closer to Bridges, who has played mostly at the 4 in the NBA.

Brown's versatility (being able to seamlessly shift between the 2 and the 3) has made him a much more valuable NBA player. He's also played a little bit here and there at the 4. Him and tatum are essentially interchangeable when it comes to positions. Tatum is taller but Brown is bulkier & has 1" longer wingspan, both have rebounded well enough to be a small ball 4 man. Brown matched up very well vs Siakam when the celtics beat the raptors in 2020 Playoffs.
1/11/24 The birth of a new Hal. From now on being less combative, avoiding confrontation - like Switzerland :)
User avatar
clyde21
RealGM
Posts: 63,534
And1: 69,956
Joined: Aug 20, 2014
     

Re: Cam Whitmore 

Post#57 » by clyde21 » Thu Mar 16, 2023 5:36 pm

Hal14 wrote:
clyde21 wrote:
Hal14 wrote:He's currently listed at 6'7", 232 lbs, a 12.2% rebounding %. Build like a linebacker, strong finisher at the rim but questionable handles and passing. He's closer to being a 4 than he is to being a 2.


they can list him at 6-7 all they want he's closer to 6-5 with probably a 6-8 w/s at best, he's essentially the same size as Isaac Okoro and Jaylen Brown (except for the w/s). if those guys aren't 4s then neither is Whitmore.

I go off listed heights until proven otherwise. You say 6'5" with nothing of any substance to base that on.

Players listed with pre-draft weight and college rebounding %
Whitmore 232 lbs, 12.2%
Isaac Okoro 225 lbs, 7.6%
Jaylen Brown 223 lbs, 10.8%
Miles Bridges 225 lbs, 12.5%

Looking at this, Whitmore compares closer to Bridges, who has played mostly at the 4 in the NBA.

Brown's versatility (being able to seamlessly shift between the 2 and the 3) has made him a much more valuable NBA player. He's also played a little bit here and there at the 4. Him and tatum are essentially interchangeable when it comes to positions. Tatum is taller but Brown is bulkier & has 1" longer wingspan, both have rebounded well enough to be a small ball 4 man. Brown matched up very well vs Siakam when the celtics beat the raptors in 2020 Playoffs.


lol - why would go off listed heights knowingly fully well they are overinflated the majority of time? I don't need to see Villanova's listed height to see the guy clearly isn't 4-sized on the court. the guy is 6-5 with a 6-8 w/s is my best guess - if he's a lot bigger than that congrats to him that definitely makes more intriguing, but most of the time the eye test doesn't really lie when it comes to size.

and Miles Bridges played the 4 by necessity, everyone played up a position on those Hornets team including PJ who was a C, doesn't mean he should be scaled as a center. in an ideal lineup Bridges he's a 3, and he also came in with a 6-10 wingspan, we'll see if Cam comes close to that but again eye test says he won't.

what advantages are you gaining by playing Cam as a 4 instead of a 2 or 3?
Braggins
RealGM
Posts: 14,226
And1: 9,058
Joined: Jan 05, 2014

Re: Cam Whitmore 

Post#58 » by Braggins » Thu Mar 16, 2023 6:19 pm

Miles Bridges with SF/SG size instead of SF/PF size is a fairly decent comp imo. Sort of a mix of pre-NBA Bridges and Jaylen Brown.
Hal14
RealGM
Posts: 20,880
And1: 19,341
Joined: Apr 05, 2019

Re: Cam Whitmore 

Post#59 » by Hal14 » Thu Mar 16, 2023 6:26 pm

clyde21 wrote:
Hal14 wrote:
clyde21 wrote:
they can list him at 6-7 all they want he's closer to 6-5 with probably a 6-8 w/s at best, he's essentially the same size as Isaac Okoro and Jaylen Brown (except for the w/s). if those guys aren't 4s then neither is Whitmore.

I go off listed heights until proven otherwise. You say 6'5" with nothing of any substance to base that on.

Players listed with pre-draft weight and college rebounding %
Whitmore 232 lbs, 12.2%
Isaac Okoro 225 lbs, 7.6%
Jaylen Brown 223 lbs, 10.8%
Miles Bridges 225 lbs, 12.5%

Looking at this, Whitmore compares closer to Bridges, who has played mostly at the 4 in the NBA.

Brown's versatility (being able to seamlessly shift between the 2 and the 3) has made him a much more valuable NBA player. He's also played a little bit here and there at the 4. Him and tatum are essentially interchangeable when it comes to positions. Tatum is taller but Brown is bulkier & has 1" longer wingspan, both have rebounded well enough to be a small ball 4 man. Brown matched up very well vs Siakam when the celtics beat the raptors in 2020 Playoffs.


lol - why would go off listed heights knowingly fully well they are overinflated the majority of time? I don't need to see Villanova's listed height to see the guy clearly isn't 4-sized on the court. the guy is 6-5 with a 6-8 w/s is my best guess - if he's a lot bigger than that congrats to him that definitely makes more intriguing, but most of the time the eye test doesn't really lie when it comes to size.

and Miles Bridges played the 4 by necessity, everyone played up a position on those Hornets team including PJ who was a C, doesn't mean he should be scaled as a center. in an ideal lineup Bridges he's a 3, and he also came in with a 6-10 wingspan, we'll see if Cam comes close to that but again eye test says he won't.

what advantages are you gaining by playing Cam as a 4 instead of a 2 or 3?

You're just guessing.

We could all have different eye tests. Eye tests are subjective. You could ask 3 different people how tall they think he is. You say 6'5", someone else might say 6'6" and someone else might say 6'7".

Or we could be objective and go off the most recently published height, which is 6'7". Mcdonalds all american game last year listed him 6'6". After that was FIBA, and they listed him 6'6". Then he goes to villanova and they list him at 6'7".

Rebounding % is also objective and is an indicator of how "big" a guy plays. You said Whitmore is a 2 and you're concerned for his versatility that he can't play the 3. I say that's laughable to say about a guy listed at 232 lbs and a rebounding % of 12.2%. He weighed more predraft than Miles Bridges, Okoro and Jaylen Brown and Whitmore posted a higher rebounding % than brown and Okoro.

Just saying, I'm not worried about his ability to play the 3. Especially in today's NBA when teams play smaller lineups more and more.
1/11/24 The birth of a new Hal. From now on being less combative, avoiding confrontation - like Switzerland :)
User avatar
clyde21
RealGM
Posts: 63,534
And1: 69,956
Joined: Aug 20, 2014
     

Re: Cam Whitmore 

Post#60 » by clyde21 » Thu Mar 16, 2023 6:54 pm

Hal14 wrote:
clyde21 wrote:
Hal14 wrote:I go off listed heights until proven otherwise. You say 6'5" with nothing of any substance to base that on.

Players listed with pre-draft weight and college rebounding %
Whitmore 232 lbs, 12.2%
Isaac Okoro 225 lbs, 7.6%
Jaylen Brown 223 lbs, 10.8%
Miles Bridges 225 lbs, 12.5%

Looking at this, Whitmore compares closer to Bridges, who has played mostly at the 4 in the NBA.

Brown's versatility (being able to seamlessly shift between the 2 and the 3) has made him a much more valuable NBA player. He's also played a little bit here and there at the 4. Him and tatum are essentially interchangeable when it comes to positions. Tatum is taller but Brown is bulkier & has 1" longer wingspan, both have rebounded well enough to be a small ball 4 man. Brown matched up very well vs Siakam when the celtics beat the raptors in 2020 Playoffs.


lol - why would go off listed heights knowingly fully well they are overinflated the majority of time? I don't need to see Villanova's listed height to see the guy clearly isn't 4-sized on the court. the guy is 6-5 with a 6-8 w/s is my best guess - if he's a lot bigger than that congrats to him that definitely makes more intriguing, but most of the time the eye test doesn't really lie when it comes to size.

and Miles Bridges played the 4 by necessity, everyone played up a position on those Hornets team including PJ who was a C, doesn't mean he should be scaled as a center. in an ideal lineup Bridges he's a 3, and he also came in with a 6-10 wingspan, we'll see if Cam comes close to that but again eye test says he won't.

what advantages are you gaining by playing Cam as a 4 instead of a 2 or 3?

You're just guessing.

We could all have different eye tests. Eye tests are subjective. You could ask 3 different people how tall they think he is. You say 6'5", someone else might say 6'6" and someone else might say 6'7".

Or we could be objective and go off the most recently published height, which is 6'7". Mcdonalds all american game last year listed him 6'6". After that was FIBA, and they listed him 6'6". Then he goes to villanova and they list him at 6'7".

Rebounding % is also objective and is an indicator of how "big" a guy plays. You said Whitmore is a 2 and you're concerned for his versatility that he can't play the 3. I say that's laughable to say about a guy listed at 232 lbs and a rebounding % of 12.2%. He weighed more predraft than Miles Bridges, Okoro and Jaylen Brown and Whitmore posted a higher rebounding % than brown and Okoro.

Just saying, I'm not worried about his ability to play the 3. Especially in today's NBA when teams play smaller lineups more and more.


look - it's either you guys actually read what's being said and pay attention or don't bother getting involved in the discussion. no one said he can't play the 3 at any point.

the discussion is if he's a 2/3 or a 3/4. i think, based on his size that we can clearly see on the court (this is not a guess we have eyes and can see his size) he doesn't have the shoulders, wingspan or raw height to be scaled as a 4, and if that's your plan for him, not sure what advantages you're looking for by playing him there.

playing him at the 2 tho, you're getting a size/rebounding advantage for the position that completely disappears if you'd rather play him as a four instead, which just doesn't make any sense. can he do it in spot minutes? sure I guess, but why would I even want that?

and it's really not that hard to guess and see how players will measure. i can easily look at Scoot and see he has long arms and big hands. i can look at GG Jackson and automatically tell he's a legit 6-9 that can scale as a combo forward in the NBA when it comes to size. for Whitmore I can see he has narrow shoulders and a mediocre wing-span which means a terrible reach. there is an off chance for him it's deceptive and he's actually longer than he looks, but this isn't really rocket science.

and his w/s was already measured in HS and it was barely 6-8, which is again fine for a 2 or even a 3, but it's terrible for a 4.

Return to NBA Draft