prime1time wrote:FrodoBaggins wrote:This guy, but 3 to 4 inches bigger and more athletic. Add an extra 3 to 5 PPG and .030 to .050 TS% to his scoring production, due to superior rim scoring, FT drawing, and era differences. I think the style of offense, basketball IQ, passing/playmaking, and defense are all relatively similar. Same strengths, just amplified; same weaknesses.
Expect some 30+ PPG, .600+ TS% seasons.
I'd still take Boozer over him, though. I think he's going to have that scorer's mentality to the detriment of defense, shot selection, off-ball offense, and passing/playmaking. General team play stuff. An incredible bucket getter that grinds the pace and ball movement to a halt, and prioritizes his gas tank toward on-ball and isolation scoring.
The opportunity cost of playing Dybantsa Ball saps his impact and makes fitting with other talent potentially questionable. I'm not sure he'll ever have Shai's or Harden's handle and point guard qualities, which make their on-ball heavy, isolation approach more palatable in a team context. AJ will be a primary creator, but more of a wing scorer who operates in the slot and passes out only when he absolutely has to.
I don't get this take. The context a player plays in dictates how a player plays. Put AJ on the Duke team last year instead of Cooper Flagg. Do you think AJ plays the same style? Put Coop on this BYU team after Richie Saunders goes down. How does Coop play? People on this thread underestimate just how much team fit and coaching plays a role in a players development. Don't just put the ball in AJ's hands. Force him to develop a well rounded game. Hold him accountable to playing defense. Push him to develop his 3-point shot. Regardless of what team drafts him, this what they should do.
I think you want AJ to be someone that he isn't, that he hasn't shown himself to be. Star or "primary" options largely play how they want to, not necessarily how they should, to varying degrees and exceptions. Some players are more malleable than others; AJ's game is more inelastic than Cooper's. His feel for the game and basketball IQ are not as developed, and his mentality is more rigid, keyed in on being a scorer.
Is it possible that Dybantsa develops a more well-rounded game? Sure. I expect him to. But to what degree? To what magnitude? And will that development be meaningful? His habits and tendencies so far haven't suggested or shown that. His #1 draft pick, superstar talent status will grant him primacy from day one, and that may cater to and ultimately enable his on-ball, isolation scoring-focused, DeRozan-esque traits and style of play.
DeMar became a better passer and playmaker, but he still displays many of the same potentially negative traits he's always had.
Don't get me wrong, I think AJ will be great. A bigger, more athletic DeMar DeRozan is a killer player. 30+ PPG, .600+ TS% potential. Worth the #1 pick over most, save for the best of the best. I just don't think his Global Impact on the scoring margin will be consistently as high as Boozer's.



























