sarah42 wrote:because its hard to read intent when something happens so quick or in general.
intent to injure really? how bout intent to just piss someone off.
i still don't see why its that big of a deal. calderon looked fine after.
i think people are making a big deal out of it. to each his own i guess. i'm not the one getting suspended.
It is a moot point what the actual intent is and to decide what the intent actually was for certain is difficult at any rate, in so many cases. It was not a move sanctioned by the rules of the game and its intent was outside the rules of good defensive play. Was he trying to set a pick , or maintain his position? I don't think so. Therefore, it is against the rules. And it is up to the league to decide how it punish the offence or whether to at all.
But let us imagine for a minute that nothing is done and in their next game a third offence (at least in th eyes of the Raptors) occurs. Let us say one of the Raptor players responds and a fracus occurs. It would be quite easy to say that the league had been negligent in letting it all get out of hand. Sometimes where people feel justice is not served, vigilante justice may take its place.
Coming down hard on these sort of infractions is never a bad idea.
In reality I do not care. I am certain that this action helped motivate the Raps and get them to the right place in the game.
Just my 3 cents.