gbball wrote:Los_29 wrote:gbball wrote:
What about Koloko? I thought that was his main advantage over Kessler.
Koloko is better on the perimeter. Unfortunately, that's the only thing he's better than Kessler at. Shooting as well but that's not saying much considering how bad Kessler is. Excited to see if Koloko can make some improvements in the offseason. I like his potential.
I think it's a major plus for him. But Kessler is far better on offense. I do think if Koloko and Kessler traded teams, Koloko would've looked better than he did here and Kessler would have looked worse than he did in Utah, but there is still a major talent gap on offense.
Koloko seems to have similar impact as a rim protector.
Perimeter defense: Koloko >> Kessler
Offense: Kessler >>> Koloko
Rim protection: Koloko = Kessler
Size/Athleticism: Koloko = Kessler (could make a slight argument in favor of either)
Shooting: I like Koloko's upside here, but I don't know enough about Kessler's shooting to make a comparison
That's how I see it. Koloko is still a pretty raw and he wasn't in a great situation to shine with our poor spacing, lack of lob passes, and lack of pick and roll opportunities, which he would have benefitted from in Utah.
I'd be surprised if Koloko doesn't catch up somewhat in terms of finishing around the rim, and I'd also be surprised if Kessler's perimeter D improves to point where he's not a liability on the perimeter in the playoffs.
For that reason I prefer Koloko's upside. We'll see what happens though.
I agree with a lot of those things but Kessler is a significantly better rim protector than Koloko. Kessler was one of the best in college history at blocking shots. He's truly a monster in that area. I actually think Koloko is the better athlete. He moves his feet a lot better and seems to be more explosive.
Kessler's shot mechanics are quite poor and he's really struggled with his shot. He's been unable to make any improvements in that area. Koloko's free throw percentage has at least improved considerably since his freshman year.
Kessler is a good finisher at the rim but he's actually a really bad offensive player. We know about his shooting woes but he also can't pass the ball. He barely touches the ball offensively. With that said, his ability to finish at the rim makes him more impactful offensively than Koloko.
I think we know what kind of player Kessler is going to be. With Koloko, there seems to be some untapped potential there. He never got serious coaching until he was 17 years old. I'm willing to be patient with him. Despite his limitations, we were somehow much better with him on the floor.