ranger001 wrote:Reignman wrote:Unfortunately, IMO, I don't think the small markets can get everything they need from the large markets. That's the problem when 22 teams can't make money and are not a preferred destination.
The players are going to have to realize the economic/systemic issues the small markets are facing. The large markets will play a part in this as well but it'll be a smaller part.
At the 50% with more revenue sharing I think a deal could have been done.
I tend to agree; however, at 50% I don't see the league being too flexible on the systemic issues.
Thoughts? Do the players get the "freedom of movement" they want at 50%?




















