ImageImageImageImageImage

Official CBA/Labour Talks Discussion Thread III

Moderators: DG88, niQ, Duffman100, tsherkin, Reeko, lebron stopper, HiJiNX, 7 Footer, Morris_Shatford

Reignman
Banned User
Posts: 19,281
And1: 391
Joined: Aug 12, 2004
Location: 2014 playoffs at the ACC!

Re: Official CBA/Labour Talks Discussion Thread III 

Post#1181 » by Reignman » Mon Nov 21, 2011 10:33 pm

ranger001 wrote:
Reignman wrote:Unfortunately, IMO, I don't think the small markets can get everything they need from the large markets. That's the problem when 22 teams can't make money and are not a preferred destination.

The players are going to have to realize the economic/systemic issues the small markets are facing. The large markets will play a part in this as well but it'll be a smaller part.

At the 50% with more revenue sharing I think a deal could have been done.


I tend to agree; however, at 50% I don't see the league being too flexible on the systemic issues.

Thoughts? Do the players get the "freedom of movement" they want at 50%?
User avatar
dhackett1565
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,884
And1: 2,152
Joined: Apr 03, 2008
Location: Pessimist central, wondering how I got here, unable to find my way out.

Re: Official CBA/Labour Talks Discussion Thread III 

Post#1182 » by dhackett1565 » Mon Nov 21, 2011 10:39 pm

Reignman wrote:I tend to agree; however, at 50% I don't see the league being too flexible on the systemic issues.

Thoughts? Do the players get the "freedom of movement" they want at 50%?


I think that for many owners, who have small market teams and of course want to be able to make money, winning is still important. They bought into this business because they are basketball fans or are competitive by nature, for the most part. So even once the financials are settled (which I think they are - 50-50 and revenue sharing should be enough in the long run) - no matter how good the financials are for the owners, there will still be a push for system changes. I don't know that the two are intertwined.
Alfred re: Coach Mitchell - "My doctor botched my surgury and sewed my hand to my head, but I can't really comment on that, because I'm not a doctor, and thus he is above my criticism."
Reignman
Banned User
Posts: 19,281
And1: 391
Joined: Aug 12, 2004
Location: 2014 playoffs at the ACC!

Re: Official CBA/Labour Talks Discussion Thread III 

Post#1183 » by Reignman » Mon Nov 21, 2011 10:47 pm

Can someone explain what this means:

usat_jzillgitt Jeff Zillgitt
NBA players involved in lawsuit vs. NBA in California's Northern District file notice of voluntary dismissal of complaint without prejudice.
22 minutes ago
Retweeted by alanhahn


alanhahn Alan Hahn
#NBA Players lawyers will hold a presser at 6 pm tonight for a "litigation update" in the wake of voluntary dismissal of NoCal lawsuit. #fb
[/quote]
Reignman
Banned User
Posts: 19,281
And1: 391
Joined: Aug 12, 2004
Location: 2014 playoffs at the ACC!

Re: Official CBA/Labour Talks Discussion Thread III 

Post#1184 » by Reignman » Mon Nov 21, 2011 10:48 pm

I'm guessing they are pulling this complaint so that they can get some kind of class action suit going?

Or is there something more optimistic?
Ponchos
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,553
And1: 4,775
Joined: Jul 04, 2010

Re: Official CBA/Labour Talks Discussion Thread III 

Post#1185 » by Ponchos » Mon Nov 21, 2011 10:54 pm

Interesting. I'm sure it's some sort of legal maneuvering to enhance their position. I'd like to be optimistic, but that hasn't worked out for me so far.
User avatar
ForeverTFC
RealGM
Posts: 18,092
And1: 19,774
Joined: Dec 07, 2004
         

Re: Official CBA/Labour Talks Discussion Thread III 

Post#1186 » by ForeverTFC » Mon Nov 21, 2011 10:58 pm

Here we go again... why do I get optimistic when I know exactly what is going to happen
User avatar
AllEnergy
Sophomore
Posts: 111
And1: 0
Joined: Sep 20, 2011
Location: MB

Re: Official CBA/Labour Talks Discussion Thread III 

Post#1187 » by AllEnergy » Mon Nov 21, 2011 11:11 pm

Hopefully this guy David Boies will fix everything up eh?

Image
User avatar
ForeverTFC
RealGM
Posts: 18,092
And1: 19,774
Joined: Dec 07, 2004
         

Re: Official CBA/Labour Talks Discussion Thread III 

Post#1188 » by ForeverTFC » Mon Nov 21, 2011 11:14 pm

They consolidated the case in Minny to expedite the process.

So did they just waste a whole week?
Ponchos
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,553
And1: 4,775
Joined: Jul 04, 2010

Re: Official CBA/Labour Talks Discussion Thread III 

Post#1189 » by Ponchos » Mon Nov 21, 2011 11:16 pm

tha-prince wrote:They consolidated the case in Minny to expedite the process.

So did they just waste a whole week?


Perhaps they just found out what the court date would be in Minny? Both suits were filed at the same time, so I don't think they wasted a week.

That's just my guess.
User avatar
ForeverTFC
RealGM
Posts: 18,092
And1: 19,774
Joined: Dec 07, 2004
         

Re: Official CBA/Labour Talks Discussion Thread III 

Post#1190 » by ForeverTFC » Mon Nov 21, 2011 11:19 pm

mccannsportslaw Michael McCann
David Boies to argue completely opposite legal position, to the same court, in the span of months. Lawyers=advocates not believers


AMEN! :noway:
User avatar
Indeed
RealGM
Posts: 21,747
And1: 3,625
Joined: Aug 21, 2009

Re: Official CBA/Labour Talks Discussion Thread III 

Post#1191 » by Indeed » Mon Nov 21, 2011 11:22 pm

Reignman wrote:
Ponchos wrote:
Reignman wrote:
Jokes, no need to get emo over something that barely affects us.


No emo here bud. It's just time to recognize that communicating with you is next to impossible. So please, you ignore me and I'll ignore you.


aww, that's too bad. BTW, figure out what rank and file means yet?


Have you found the link where players believe owner are losing $160m?
I don't see owners are making any claim on their league wide lost, they only say they are not making enough money.
Ponchos
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,553
And1: 4,775
Joined: Jul 04, 2010

Re: Official CBA/Labour Talks Discussion Thread III 

Post#1192 » by Ponchos » Mon Nov 21, 2011 11:27 pm

tha-prince wrote:
mccannsportslaw Michael McCann
David Boies to argue completely opposite legal position, to the same court, in the span of months. Lawyers=advocates not believers


AMEN! :noway:


Lawyers should be advocates and not believers. Believers tend to fall into bad arguments.
User avatar
ForeverTFC
RealGM
Posts: 18,092
And1: 19,774
Joined: Dec 07, 2004
         

Re: Official CBA/Labour Talks Discussion Thread III 

Post#1193 » by ForeverTFC » Mon Nov 21, 2011 11:41 pm

Ponchos wrote:
tha-prince wrote:
mccannsportslaw Michael McCann
David Boies to argue completely opposite legal position, to the same court, in the span of months. Lawyers=advocates not believers


AMEN! :noway:


Lawyers should be advocates and not believers. Believers tend to fall into bad arguments.


He is going to argue to exact case, in front of the same court but on the other side of the aisle, in less than a year.

:roll:
User avatar
dhackett1565
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,884
And1: 2,152
Joined: Apr 03, 2008
Location: Pessimist central, wondering how I got here, unable to find my way out.

Re: Official CBA/Labour Talks Discussion Thread III 

Post#1194 » by dhackett1565 » Mon Nov 21, 2011 11:45 pm

Indeed wrote:Have you found the link where players believe owner are losing $160m?
I don't see owners are making any claim on their league wide lost, they only say they are not making enough money.


Having a hard time linking directly to the podcast interview, but here is a summary of it, with a link to it.

http://www.knicks101.com/2011/10/13/nba ... esa-today/

In the podcast itself, IIRC, Hunter says 160 million, but the summary says 150 million. But that is the source of that information.
Alfred re: Coach Mitchell - "My doctor botched my surgury and sewed my hand to my head, but I can't really comment on that, because I'm not a doctor, and thus he is above my criticism."
Fairview4Life
RealGM
Posts: 70,352
And1: 34,143
Joined: Jul 25, 2005
     

Re: Official CBA/Labour Talks Discussion Thread III 

Post#1195 » by Fairview4Life » Mon Nov 21, 2011 11:45 pm

Reignman wrote:Simple is talking about aspirations, dreams and fairy tales in a multi-billion dollar CBA negotiation.


Reignman wrote:
MEDIC wrote:Personally, I think the NBA has the potential to have a great overall product & rival the NFL in terms to success. There has to be some major changes to the system though.

If other posters don't feel the same way about this potential, that's fine. You're entitled to your opinion.

Either way, this is the gold standard & what they should be striving to be.


Agreed 100%. The defeatist attitude is weird to me. We're talking about basketball here, the only sport where you just need a ball and maybe an egg crate and you can play it anywhere.

This sport should be up there with the likes of soccer due to it's accessibility.

There's no reason basketball shouldn't set its eyes on the top in the north american market.
9. Similarly, IF THOU HAST SPENT the entire offseason predicting that thy team will stink, thou shalt not gloat, nor even be happy, shouldst thou turn out to be correct. Realistic analysis is fine, but be a fan first, a smug smarty-pants second.
Reignman
Banned User
Posts: 19,281
And1: 391
Joined: Aug 12, 2004
Location: 2014 playoffs at the ACC!

Re: Official CBA/Labour Talks Discussion Thread III 

Post#1196 » by Reignman » Mon Nov 21, 2011 11:53 pm

Fairview4Life wrote:
Reignman wrote:Simple is talking about aspirations, dreams and fairy tales in a multi-billion dollar CBA negotiation.


Reignman wrote:
MEDIC wrote:Personally, I think the NBA has the potential to have a great overall product & rival the NFL in terms to success. There has to be some major changes to the system though.

If other posters don't feel the same way about this potential, that's fine. You're entitled to your opinion.

Either way, this is the gold standard & what they should be striving to be.


Agreed 100%. The defeatist attitude is weird to me. We're talking about basketball here, the only sport where you just need a ball and maybe an egg crate and you can play it anywhere.

This sport should be up there with the likes of soccer due to it's accessibility.

There's no reason basketball shouldn't set its eyes on the top in the north american market.


Are you really comparing a growing sport like basketball increasing its market share by improving competitive parity to lower level basketball players aspiring to make MLE money?

If you are then I don't get it. Actually, I don't get it period.
Ponchos
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,553
And1: 4,775
Joined: Jul 04, 2010

Re: Official CBA/Labour Talks Discussion Thread III 

Post#1197 » by Ponchos » Tue Nov 22, 2011 12:07 am

tha-prince wrote:

He is going to argue to exact case, in front of the same court but on the other side of the aisle, in less than a year.

:roll:


Arguing to judges who understand how the advocate system works.

In law school we often had to make arguments for both sides of an issue on exams.
User avatar
ranger001
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 26,938
And1: 3,752
Joined: Feb 23, 2001
   

Re: Official CBA/Labour Talks Discussion Thread III 

Post#1198 » by ranger001 » Tue Nov 22, 2011 12:10 am

The judge in the Minnesota case is Patrick Schiltz who once litigated for the nfl.
User avatar
PHANTOMPHOENIX
Head Coach
Posts: 6,372
And1: 1,074
Joined: Dec 03, 2003
Location: Future Waived Hall of Famer.

Re: Official CBA/Labour Talks Discussion Thread III 

Post#1199 » by PHANTOMPHOENIX » Tue Nov 22, 2011 12:13 am

ranger001 wrote:The judge in the Minnesota case is Patrick Schiltz who once litigated for the nfl.


I am surprised the players don't have a problem with this
Image
Reignman
Banned User
Posts: 19,281
And1: 391
Joined: Aug 12, 2004
Location: 2014 playoffs at the ACC!

Re: Official CBA/Labour Talks Discussion Thread III 

Post#1200 » by Reignman » Tue Nov 22, 2011 12:13 am

As per Ranger on the GB, the Minnesota judge used to litigate on behalf of the NFL. Doesn't sound like a good thing.

Also hearing that Boies didn't like the fact that in the Norther Cal case they were assigned to San Francisco which wasn't a "preferred destination" lol.

NBA claims that these guys are just fishing for a "preferred destination".

IMO, sounds like a gong show and I'm heavily leaning towards the fact that Boies/Kessler/players are going to get their bluff called if they haven't already.

Return to Toronto Raptors