Drakeem wrote:I don't get it though. Can't you just use the same logic as the Grant signing and just flip him down the road for even more assets? The road doesn't end with just having OG. If the rumors are true, that's another potential 3 FRPs you can nab. I don't think Herro gets you the same.JRoy wrote:ItsDanger wrote:The reason this Portland fan denigrates OG's impact is the same reason Portland could never get over the hump with Lillard. Cant have a lineup full of mediocre to below average defenders, but even worse, can't even appreciate why the team fails.
Straw man.
Never said that. OG is a fine player but he is a defensive role player who needs to play off a star to thrive in a catch and shoot role because he is terrible at everything else on offense.
On defense he is elite, with some switchability; a very nice player.
But trading a star (Lillard) for a high end role player (OG) never works out well.
OG cannot be the center piece in a Lillard deal. He is looking to get paid as a UFA.
The idea that I am rebutting these trade ideas to spite TOR are ridiculous. I am rebutting them because they are good only for TOR.
The Grant signing was a terrible idea. I’d love to move him but I guess the thinking is the FO wants s solid vet on the team when Lillard departs. Not bringing OG on at his salary and flight risk for the chance to possibly move him for 3 picks later.









