UnbelievablyRAW wrote:Only doing RJ for Pat Williams if it’s done in a 3 teamer with the Nets
RJ and 19 to Chicago
Pat Williams and 9 to Nets
Cam Johnson, Collins and 12 to Toronto
Honestly not a bad deal for all involved.
Moderators: DG88, niQ, Duffman100, tsherkin, Reeko, lebron stopper, HiJiNX, 7 Footer, Morris_Shatford
UnbelievablyRAW wrote:Only doing RJ for Pat Williams if it’s done in a 3 teamer with the Nets
RJ and 19 to Chicago
Pat Williams and 9 to Nets
Cam Johnson, Collins and 12 to Toronto
Randle McMurphy wrote:bobbyp3588 wrote:Randle McMurphy wrote:Didn’t go after KD or just lost out on him?
There’s no evidence they weren’t trying to get him. Houston just saved them from themselves by offering more.
Show me proof they even had a convo. There was never any real interest on our part. As usual our name was being thrown around for views, clicks and leverage.
If they didn’t even have a conversation for a player as good as KD, I would question that even more than anything.
Randle McMurphy wrote:bobbyp3588 wrote:Randle McMurphy wrote:Didn’t go after KD or just lost out on him?
There’s no evidence they weren’t trying to get him. Houston just saved them from themselves by offering more.
Show me proof they even had a convo. There was never any real interest on our part. As usual our name was being thrown around for views, clicks and leverage.
If they didn’t even have a conversation for a player as good as KD, I would question that even more than anything.
bobbyp3588 wrote:720 wrote:Would have been cool, oh well. Not really tripping. Ingram coming into the rotation, an improved Scottie, Jakobe, and Gradey, next season should be fun either way. If for some reason we suck (Ingram gets injured, or maybe no one improves), then we can tank for AJ or Boozer.
It wouldn’t have been cool at all. It would have broken the team and scuttled the next half decade of development.
Absolutely thrilled with this news. I just knew we weren’t legit interested.
NotMyKawhi wrote:We can't even get old superstars on expirings lol Raptors are extinct
NotMyKawhi wrote:We can't even get old superstars on expirings lol Raptors are extinct
NotMyKawhi wrote:We can't even get old superstars on expirings lol Raptors are extinct
Raptors Realtor wrote:Randle McMurphy wrote:bobbyp3588 wrote:
Show me proof they even had a convo. There was never any real interest on our part. As usual our name was being thrown around for views, clicks and leverage.
If they didn’t even have a conversation for a player as good as KD, I would question that even more than anything.
Literally contradicting yourself.
NotMyKawhi wrote:We can't even get old superstars on expirings lol Raptors are extinct
PushDaRock wrote:How useful is a 40% shooter on such low volume? Last year he finally increased the volume and it's still on the low side at 6.2 3PA per 36 and his percentage dropped to 35%. It could be variance but it's not what you want to see either.
Randle McMurphy wrote:Raptors Realtor wrote:Randle McMurphy wrote:If they didn’t even have a conversation for a player as good as KD, I would question that even more than anything.
Literally contradicting yourself.
How so?
Raptors Realtor wrote:Randle McMurphy wrote:Raptors Realtor wrote:
Literally contradicting yourself.
How so?
First post, you stated that the Rockets saved Masai/Bobby from themselves for showing interest in trading for KD, and in the following post, you said if they didn't even make a call showing interest that would be even more questionable then showing interest.
Randle McMurphy wrote:Raptors Realtor wrote:Randle McMurphy wrote:How so?
First post, you stated that the Rockets saved Masai/Bobby from themselves for showing interest in trading for KD, and in the following post, you said if they didn't even make a call showing interest that would be even more questionable then showing interest.
I don’t see how those are conflicting ideas. It’s their responsibility to look into what a player like KD will cost; that doesn’t mean trading for him at that cost is a good idea.
Duffman100 wrote:Randle McMurphy wrote:Raptors Realtor wrote:
First post, you stated that the Rockets saved Masai/Bobby from themselves for showing interest in trading for KD, and in the following post, you said if they didn't even make a call showing interest that would be even more questionable then showing interest.
I don’t see how those are conflicting ideas. It’s their responsibility to look into what a player like KD will cost; that doesn’t mean trading for him at that cost is a good idea.
But without knowing what the cost was or the conversations. How were they saved from themselves?
Again, stop trolling. Last warning.
Randle McMurphy wrote:Duffman100 wrote:Randle McMurphy wrote:I don’t see how those are conflicting ideas. It’s their responsibility to look into what a player like KD will cost; that doesn’t mean trading for him at that cost is a good idea.
But without knowing what the cost was or the conversations. How were they saved from themselves?
Again, stop trolling. Last warning.
The initial post I responded to indicated that the Raptors didn’t even try for KD, which is contrary to everything that has been reported.
Maybe I’m missing what the problem is here?
720 wrote:bobbyp3588 wrote:720 wrote:Would have been cool, oh well. Not really tripping. Ingram coming into the rotation, an improved Scottie, Jakobe, and Gradey, next season should be fun either way. If for some reason we suck (Ingram gets injured, or maybe no one improves), then we can tank for AJ or Boozer.
It wouldn’t have been cool at all. It would have broken the team and scuttled the next half decade of development.
Absolutely thrilled with this news. I just knew we weren’t legit interested.
I agree but I was thinking had we got Durant we wouldn’t have overpaid.