Pointgod wrote:ForeverTFC wrote:Pointgod wrote:
Sure but you can’t predict that, but you can be on the right side of the probability to stay in the top 5. No one in their right mind would choose a 52% chance for a top 4 pick over a 26% and 8.6% chance.
Sure, but it depends what it costs you. Gutting your team to get that edge may not be worth it. This team was not going to lost less than Washington, the Jazz, the Nets, and the Hornets once they lost their guys to injury. We just have way better players. To get to their level, we'd have to sell off talent. You have to enter this into the equation.
I keep hearing people say that we’d have to gut our team to lose. I believe at some point in the season we had the third worst record in the league. Do you think we’d have to trade every player to maintain that lead? People questioned why we were playing vets when we had that mini run in January. Could have been simple as trading Poeltl, Boucher and either Brown or Olynyk. You can arguably still make the trade for Ingram and the only difference is that you have more assets having moved Poeltl and Boucher. I’d still rather push the lottery probabilities in our favour than a half measure.
Because this ignores the fact that most of the team was injured to begin the season. You can't just project that record forward. Let's say we traded Poeltl (a move that would have resulted in more losses) and ended with the 4th-6th best odds. I think we both agree the 7th and 8th pick would not have been worth that. So off the bat, your most likely outcome is a bad one. Then there is the 1/3rd chance at the 3rd pick. And what does that give us? Bailey? Edgecomb? Harper?
It's just not worth it. Again, if you look at the draft, picking 6-10 is interchangeable.
























