He dunked on, over a Baylor player at the 22 second mark of the video and had a few more dunks in the paint against opponents...did you really watch the full video?
This is not dunking on someone, this is dunking past someone.
Sir-Swish-A-Lot wrote:Nope, you can't say that about almost any player. Some players never figure it out. There is a long list of those type of players that had the talent but could get in where they fit in
The USC game is a game that the UW won by 32 points. Stewart had 18 pts, 10 rebs, 2 blks in 27 minutes in that game. To top it off Stewart was fouled on that clip that you posted up against USC. Plus, if you noticed Stewart has hands of steel once he gets a hold of the ball he keeps it in his possession as well as he's good at snatching passes out of the air while heavily guarded. Throw it up to him and he's like a tight end catching a pass he goes and gets the ball.
I watched every game that Stewart played this past season in full so a clip or photo of a possession or two is meaningless to me when taken into context in relation to his entire body of work this season which ended with 29 pts, 12 rebs against Arizona in the Pac-12 tournament.
Stewart was so powerful that a Pac-12 ref told him at halftime of their Oregon game that he couldn't use his natural strength to ward off defenders as per Stewart in a post game presser. Stewart could just toss opponents off of him he's so strong so Pac-12 refs seemingly decided to let opponents hack him to death but that still couldn't stop him from doing damage in the paint.
Your entire argument boils down to Isaiah Stewart was a good college player, which is obvious. Nobody said he didn't put up stats or that he wasn't strong repeating this over and over like it means anything is not accomplishing anything.
It's great that you "watched every game he played", but this is also something that can be accomplished by a child, it doesn't make their analysis any more meaningful. The entire body of work shows that Stewart was not a post playmaker in college, evidenced by his low Creation numbers and high AST/TO numbers with a couple of possessions I picked out as examples from the games that I have seen. Thus I believe he is a poor playmaker your personal opinion on that doesn't change anything.
Was Pascal a starter his first season in Toronto? His second season in Toronto? How can you say that Stewart won't develop into a starter over time? He is only 19 years old (just turned 19 on May 22) and is only going to get better as he matures. Pascal was 22 years old when he was drafted. Let's see what Stewart looks like in 3 years at the age of 22.
Yes, I am saying that Stewart is likely not going to be a starting level center on a good team, why? Because this is a draft thread and the draft is about projections, given what we have seen from Stewart I don't see him as a future starter. That's my projection. Feel Free to disagree.
C'mon man, JaVale McGee isn't signing with Toronto. I can't even take your post seriously...step your game up, buddy. Try again.
It's not about specifically Javale, it's about how there are really good centers every free agency that can be had for the min or close to it. There's no point in investing picks into a role you can get a better player at for less cost
and please do not try to belittle me, your posts have been nothing but biased takes and platitudes. I have yet to a see a quality argument from you that doesn't come down to " he will be good I promise"
There are zero teams ever that don't want a pass out of a double or in this situation 
