Until Ford future was known, it
BC looking to trade Dixon for SF with experience and grit
Moderators: 7 Footer, Morris_Shatford, DG88, niQ, Duffman100, tsherkin, Reeko, lebron stopper, HiJiNX
BC looking to trade Dixon for SF with experience and grit
- supersub15
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 16,846
- And1: 27
- Joined: Dec 16, 2003
- Location: God, family, Raps and Man U
Re: BC looking to trade Dixon for SF with experience and gri
- ImissJordan
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,404
- And1: 973
- Joined: Nov 17, 2004
- Location: Toronto, ON
Re: BC looking to trade Dixon for SF with experience and gri
- gangstaff
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,809
- And1: 2
- Joined: Jan 10, 2005
- Location: Click my sig
Re: BC looking to trade Dixon for SF with experience and gri
supersub15 wrote:read more here
The only 2 names that fit the bill that I can think of are Andres Nocioni and Ron Artest. Anybody else?
I'm sure Eric Williams is available.
How the heck are we going to turn Dixon into Nocioni or Artest?
Re: BC looking to trade Dixon for SF with experience and gri
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 36,057
- And1: 9,437
- Joined: Jul 12, 2003
- Location: Boardman gets paid!
Re: BC looking to trade Dixon for SF with experience and gri
supersub15 wrote:The only 2 names that fit the bill that I can think of are Andres Nocioni and Ron Artest. Anybody else?
I don't think Artest is on BC's radar whatsoever but I suppose it could happen. Nocioni makes perfect sense but I'd expect the Bulls would want quite a bit more than just Dixon; they won't go from offering Andres for Gasol to just giving him away. Even though a trade would be tricky due to his BYC status he does make quite a bit of sense as a trade target from both sides. I wonder if the Bulls aren't looking to get even younger after their season so far (particularly after failing to land a star for garbage) and if a package starting with Humphries (they could really use him desperately and I think he'd fit in well over there) and Dixon would interest them at all.
For the most part, the kinds of SFs that would be available for Dixon and most of the filler I expect the Raptors to be offering won't be any better than Kapono, Graham, Delfino and Moon.
Bucket! Bucket!
- Consequence
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,680
- And1: 474
- Joined: Oct 10, 2006
Re: BC looking to trade Dixon for SF with experience and gri
- supersub15
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 16,846
- And1: 27
- Joined: Dec 16, 2003
- Location: God, family, Raps and Man U
Re: BC looking to trade Dixon for SF with experience and gri
I_Like_Dirt wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
For the most part, the kinds of SFs that would be available for Dixon and most of the filler I expect the Raptors to be offering won't be any better than Kapono, Graham, Delfino and Moon.
That's why I think Nocioni and Artest are the only two that fit the bill. If we're getting back another so-so player, then what's the use?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 36,057
- And1: 9,437
- Joined: Jul 12, 2003
- Location: Boardman gets paid!
If BC adds yet another SF I think he's also got to move a couple of them. How many guys who can play SF does the team actually need? Moon, Graham, Delfino, Kapono, Parker (on occasion) and Garbajosa should be back next season. Adding another guy to that list without thinning it out makes absolutely no sense unless this team is willing to move forward with only 2 PGs and 4 bigs.
Bucket! Bucket!
- Consequence
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,680
- And1: 474
- Joined: Oct 10, 2006
I do not want Nocioni on this team. Watching the Bulls this year has exposed him to me as:
-A chucker. He takes very ill-advised long jumpers, even when there are two guys in is face. I've never seen one player kill so many fast breaks by pulling up for an 18 footer instead of pressing the advantge.
- NOT a good defender, contrary to popular belief. He puts a lot of effort in and flys around as if he was doing something, but the main reasons that he does so are that he begins in a bad defensive position against his match-up and then doesn't have the lateral quicks to recover adequately. With the lack of a capable help defender in the paint to erase these mistakes, he'd make the Raptors D even worse.
-Overpaid. Signed above the MLE until 2012, and then there is a team option.
-A chucker. He takes very ill-advised long jumpers, even when there are two guys in is face. I've never seen one player kill so many fast breaks by pulling up for an 18 footer instead of pressing the advantge.
- NOT a good defender, contrary to popular belief. He puts a lot of effort in and flys around as if he was doing something, but the main reasons that he does so are that he begins in a bad defensive position against his match-up and then doesn't have the lateral quicks to recover adequately. With the lack of a capable help defender in the paint to erase these mistakes, he'd make the Raptors D even worse.
-Overpaid. Signed above the MLE until 2012, and then there is a team option.
- Fenris-77
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,076
- And1: 1,287
- Joined: Dec 02, 2007
-
Ed Najera might fit the bill. He's expiring though, so I'm not sure that's the kind of value Denver wants. Maybe Dixon and Moon or some such deal. Or Dixon for Kleiza and some parts, I'd do that in a shot (although Denver likely wouldn't
).
Moving at least one SF would be necessary though, perhaps even two. I'm with Dirt in thinking that an excess of SFs is not what the team wants to run with. So a one for one lateral move might not be what B-Co's looking at.
Kleiza or Gomes would be my two choices if we're not going to consider the Artests and Nocioni's of the world. Apparently Sacremento is looking into dealing Artest for Najera and Kleiza, so that's the kind of package we'd need to put together. Link-http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/rumors/post/Kings-interested-in-Nuggets-Kleiza-and-Najera-fo;_ylt=AsdCvV3.VMtef4yzN_.WPVOkvLYF?urn=nba,64989

Moving at least one SF would be necessary though, perhaps even two. I'm with Dirt in thinking that an excess of SFs is not what the team wants to run with. So a one for one lateral move might not be what B-Co's looking at.
Kleiza or Gomes would be my two choices if we're not going to consider the Artests and Nocioni's of the world. Apparently Sacremento is looking into dealing Artest for Najera and Kleiza, so that's the kind of package we'd need to put together. Link-http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/rumors/post/Kings-interested-in-Nuggets-Kleiza-and-Najera-fo;_ylt=AsdCvV3.VMtef4yzN_.WPVOkvLYF?urn=nba,64989
- ImissJordan
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,404
- And1: 973
- Joined: Nov 17, 2004
- Location: Toronto, ON
Fenris-77 wrote:Ed Najera might fit the bill. He's expiring though, so I'm not sure that's the kind of value Denver wants. Maybe Dixon and Moon or some such deal. Or Dixon for Kleiza and some parts, I'd do that in a shot (although Denver likely wouldn't).
Moving at least one SF would be necessary though, perhaps even two. I'm with Dirt in thinking that an excess of SFs is not what the team wants to run with. So a one for one lateral move might not be what B-Co's looking at.
Kleiza or Gomes would be my two choices if we're not going to consider the Artests and Nocioni's of the world. Apparently Sacremento is looking into dealing Artest for Najera and Kleiza, so that's the kind of package we'd need to put together. Link-http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/rumors/post/Kings-interested-in-Nuggets-Kleiza-and-Najera-fo;_ylt=AsdCvV3.VMtef4yzN_.WPVOkvLYF?urn=nba,64989
Najera and Kleiza? We can't match that, unless we are willing to part with Jose, Andrea or our first-rounder. I think Nocioni is more realistic, even though his BYC status complicates matters.
- James Ballswin (Realizar)
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,754
- And1: 3
- Joined: Dec 15, 2003
- Location: ESPN TrueHoop Network - Toronto: Raptors Republic
- Contact: