Would you deal with Boston?
Moderators: Inigo Montoya, FJS
Would you deal with Boston?
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,163
- And1: 2,447
- Joined: Nov 02, 2010
-
Would you deal with Boston?
-Al Jefferson + Devin Harris
for
-Rajon Rondo + Glen Davis(S&T) + O'Neal + cash + draft pick
Jazz
5.Kanter/Okur/Davis
4.Favors/Millsap/Davis
3.Hayward/Burks
2.Burks/Hayward
1.Rondo/Miles
Boston
5.Jefferson/KG
4.KG/Johnson/Green
3.Pierce/Green
2.Allen/Moore
1.Harris/Moore
What do you think?
for
-Rajon Rondo + Glen Davis(S&T) + O'Neal + cash + draft pick
Jazz
5.Kanter/Okur/Davis
4.Favors/Millsap/Davis
3.Hayward/Burks
2.Burks/Hayward
1.Rondo/Miles
Boston
5.Jefferson/KG
4.KG/Johnson/Green
3.Pierce/Green
2.Allen/Moore
1.Harris/Moore
What do you think?
Re: Would you deal with Boston?
-
- Junior
- Posts: 359
- And1: 0
- Joined: Feb 10, 2011
Re: Would you deal with Boston?
cj miles isn't a point guard
Re: Would you deal with Boston?
- BarneyGumble
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,057
- And1: 2,213
- Joined: Sep 06, 2008
Re: Would you deal with Boston?
first of all I dont think Boston does this. Second, what is Glen Davis' contract like? Third, what is Jermaine's contract like? At this point, Jermaine is a respected benchwarmer and not much else....
Re: Would you deal with Boston?
- jazzfan1971
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 39,327
- And1: 8,581
- Joined: Jul 16, 2001
- Location: Salt Lake City
-
Re: Would you deal with Boston?
I'd probably do it. I think we take a talent hit, but, we also get arguably the best player in the trade. I really like Rondo and have proposed a VERY similar trade not long ago.
"Thibs called back and wanted more picks," said Jorge Sedano. "And Pat Riley, literally, I was told, called him a mother-bleeper and hung up the phone."
Re: Would you deal with Boston?
- Soul Patch
- RealGM
- Posts: 21,263
- And1: 948
- Joined: Jun 16, 2008
- Location: I'm at the White Castle
- Contact:
Re: Would you deal with Boston?
We'd see a lot of zone played against us and I don't know how we'd break it to be honest. Hayward is the only one that can shoot, except for Millsap in the fourth quarter.
Jugs wrote:Fark orf slet kent dome wuote ujquote exp
Re: Would you deal with Boston?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 21,602
- And1: 30
- Joined: Oct 10, 2006
- Location: why you take out my sig for?
Re: Would you deal with Boston?
Yikes, give up our two best players for a pg who can't shoot and a back up pf? Who knows what rondo is like without 3 hall of famers.
Terrible trade.
Terrible trade.
Re: Would you deal with Boston?
- DelaneyRudd
- Senior Mod
- Posts: 104,537
- And1: 9,468
- Joined: Nov 17, 2006
-
Re: Would you deal with Boston?
2 best players?
Re: Would you deal with Boston?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 21,602
- And1: 30
- Joined: Oct 10, 2006
- Location: why you take out my sig for?
Re: Would you deal with Boston?
We don't have two better or more productive players on our team that big al and devin Harris. Not even close. I like Hayward and favors more, but they aren't our best right now.
Re: Would you deal with Boston?
- jazzfan1971
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 39,327
- And1: 8,581
- Joined: Jul 16, 2001
- Location: Salt Lake City
-
Re: Would you deal with Boston?
I thought Milsap and Hwayward were our best 2 last year.
"Thibs called back and wanted more picks," said Jorge Sedano. "And Pat Riley, literally, I was told, called him a mother-bleeper and hung up the phone."
Re: Would you deal with Boston?
- Xsy
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,012
- And1: 2,266
- Joined: Aug 22, 2010
-
Re: Would you deal with Boston?
Hayward has potential to be a great player.
But his game came too late in the season to say he did better than Harris or Jefferson.
Next year should be more interesting.
But his game came too late in the season to say he did better than Harris or Jefferson.
Next year should be more interesting.
Jazz on your face.
Re: Would you deal with Boston?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 21,602
- And1: 30
- Joined: Oct 10, 2006
- Location: why you take out my sig for?
Re: Would you deal with Boston?
I think people forget that Al Jefferson averaged 19/9/2/2 last year shooting 50%/76%. Those are really, really good numbers.
Devin Harris was learning a new system, and coming back from injury, and still put up 16/5.
Devin Harris was learning a new system, and coming back from injury, and still put up 16/5.
Re: Would you deal with Boston?
- Kaner
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,625
- And1: 8
- Joined: Nov 23, 2010
- Location: PHX/CLE
Re: Would you deal with Boston?
Burks and Rondo would be the worst shooting back court in the NBA...on the other hand, they could lead the NBA in steals/assists.

Re: Would you deal with Boston?
- Soul Patch
- RealGM
- Posts: 21,263
- And1: 948
- Joined: Jun 16, 2008
- Location: I'm at the White Castle
- Contact:
Re: Would you deal with Boston?
Bat wrote:I think people forget that Al Jefferson averaged 19/9/2/2 last year shooting 50%/76%. Those are really, really good numbers.
Devin Harris was learning a new system, and coming back from injury, and still put up 16/5.
You're ruining my panic. Someone, quick, get me a ledge to jump off of.
Jugs wrote:Fark orf slet kent dome wuote ujquote exp
Re: Would you deal with Boston?
- Reckless
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,540
- And1: 564
- Joined: May 21, 2007
-
Re: Would you deal with Boston?
Rondo is overrated player who only puts up big assist numbers because of the players around him.
that's why i say no to this trade
that's why i say no to this trade
Re: Would you deal with Boston?
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,110
- And1: 1
- Joined: Feb 08, 2006
Re: Would you deal with Boston?
Rondo 100 times better than Harris
Big Baby--Al is a wash but I like Al bc he can play center but Big Al has terrible contract
Celtics would NEVER do this trade!!! The only way they do this trade is if the Jazz add Hayward and then the Jazz wouldnt do it.
Simply cant happen bc Rondo means too much to Celtics! To get him you need to give up alot (ie either Favors or Hayward) who I dont trade for anyone on their team.
The future is bright in Utah and we just need to continue forward rebuilding the team around Hayward and Favors plus the 2 draftees. We also need to get rid of the trash (Harris and Big Al).
Big Baby--Al is a wash but I like Al bc he can play center but Big Al has terrible contract
Celtics would NEVER do this trade!!! The only way they do this trade is if the Jazz add Hayward and then the Jazz wouldnt do it.
Simply cant happen bc Rondo means too much to Celtics! To get him you need to give up alot (ie either Favors or Hayward) who I dont trade for anyone on their team.
The future is bright in Utah and we just need to continue forward rebuilding the team around Hayward and Favors plus the 2 draftees. We also need to get rid of the trash (Harris and Big Al).
Top 4 seed in the West!!! Guaranteed!!!
Re: Would you deal with Boston?
-
- Senior
- Posts: 505
- And1: 3
- Joined: Sep 22, 2010
Re: Would you deal with Boston?
Thats a bit much. Rondo is a great PG but to say he is 100 times better I dunno. hes better as a pure PG his game how ever has take a step backwards offensively. I also dont think jeffersons washed up if almost averaging a 20 10 is washed up than Id like to get a few more washed up players like that. I do agree that neither team would go through with this trade. It just doesn't add up. Utah is trying to get rid of a PF to make room for our rookies so why get rid of one just to add two. In my opinion and this is just my opinion Utah would be giving up too much.
Re: Would you deal with Boston?
- BarneyGumble
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,057
- And1: 2,213
- Joined: Sep 06, 2008
Re: Would you deal with Boston?
HolyToledo wrote:Rondo 100 times better than Harris
Big Baby--Al is a wash but I like Al bc he can play center but Big Al has terrible contract
Celtics would NEVER do this trade!!! The only way they do this trade is if the Jazz add Hayward and then the Jazz wouldnt do it.
Simply cant happen bc Rondo means too much to Celtics! To get him you need to give up alot (ie either Favors or Hayward) who I dont trade for anyone on their team.
The future is bright in Utah and we just need to continue forward rebuilding the team around Hayward and Favors plus the 2 draftees. We also need to get rid of the trash (Harris and Big Al).
I disagree. KG doesnt have many years left, much less at an elite level. Big for small and young for old is the rule of any tread, if you can pull it off. Al is young, and a big. Rondo is a PG who can't shoot, on a team full of great players in a league full of great point guards.
I think Boston would do this trade without thinking twice.
Re: Would you deal with Boston?
- Jazz_Man_86
- Junior
- Posts: 457
- And1: 18
- Joined: Jan 03, 2010
-
Re: Would you deal with Boston?
Hm, many times is hear words that Al has terrible contract.
For 19+9+2 for young center is really bad contract?
About the trade.
One word = no way.
For 19+9+2 for young center is really bad contract?
About the trade.
One word = no way.
Re: Would you deal with Boston?
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,294
- And1: 213
- Joined: Feb 07, 2010
Re: Would you deal with Boston?
Boston hangs up in seconds.
Re: Would you deal with Boston?
- idajazz
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,385
- And1: 139
- Joined: Jan 08, 2002
-
Re: Would you deal with Boston?
HolyToledo wrote:Rondo 100 times better than Harris
Big Baby--Al is a wash but I like Al bc he can play center but Big Al has terrible contract
Celtics would NEVER do this trade!!! The only way they do this trade is if the Jazz add Hayward and then the Jazz wouldnt do it.
Simply cant happen bc Rondo means too much to Celtics! To get him you need to give up alot (ie either Favors or Hayward) who I dont trade for anyone on their team.
The future is bright in Utah and we just need to continue forward rebuilding the team around Hayward and Favors plus the 2 draftees. We also need to get rid of the trash (Harris and Big Al).
Big Baby--Al is a wash
What?