Pillendreher wrote:spearsy23 wrote:Pillendreher wrote:
The problem is they were never there to begin with. We always got by with talent alone but we never were a team that won because of fundamentaly sound basketball. Maybe Scott Brooks' 'Play hard and have fun' was a little bit too much, huh? This quote sums it up quice nicely (from DT):
Everything will be Scott's fault from now until the end of time
It's amazing how we were much more consistent, played better defense, rebounded better and looked more aggressive under him but people still want to blame him for things going badly.
Scotty has his flaws. You can't deny that.
Did he? Sure. I mean he isn't Pop, he was rigid with his rotations, he had an unimaginative offense, he was over reliant on KD and Russ. But it's awfully strange that Donovan comes in and the rotations suck, the offense is even more reliant on KD and Russ, the team is incredibly inconsistent both in terms of play and effort, and every player except Westbrook looks worse than they have previously in their careers. I thought maybe we were done making up things to criticize Brooks about now that we moved on, but here we are. I'm sick and tired of a very good NBA coach being the fan's whipping boy and the front office's scape-goat. Scott Brooks was a top 5 NBA coach and 'we' ran him out of town because of some minor flaws that were exaggerated by an impatient fan base and a media with an agenda.
Was Scott Brooks ever going to be Pops or Phil? No. He isn't an all time great coach that will LEAD the team to a championship. But most championship coaches aren't that. Most are Spoe or Doc or Larry Brown, guys that excel at certain aspects and can guide a great roster. Hell, Donovan may even be that one day and I hope he gets there soon, but for right now let's quit with this stupid bull**** where we continue piling crap on a great coach and person so that we can excuse his failures.