Oklahoma City Thunder Regular Season 2015-2016 Part 2

Moderators: retrobro90, Dadouv47

User avatar
getrichordie
General Manager
Posts: 9,425
And1: 2,313
Joined: Oct 22, 2015
 

Re: Oklahoma City Thunder Regular Season 2015-2016 Part 2 

Post#1741 » by getrichordie » Mon Jan 11, 2016 10:00 pm

dbrandon wrote:getrichordie, just so I don't come off like a complete tool, the reason I'm laughing at this is because we've actually had a thread on Serge's trade value over on the T&T board. You may find the responses illuminating. Suffice it to say he's worth a little more than that.

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=1417189


I think you guys misunderstood me. I wasn't saying that Lavoy Allen was the primary guy we are trading for. I'm talking about trading Serge for a starter + rotation guys. I'm not just saying make Allen the starter. I'm talking about making Allen a rotation guy along with another PF for Collison and Ibaka. In return we get some pieces for the bench. Maybe my wording was poor.

But I was thinking this:

Ibaka + parts

for

Starting PF + Allen + Stuckey

in a three team trade of course.
[twitter] @thunderdustin
Andre Roberstan
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 10,527
And1: 6,865
Joined: Jun 23, 2015
Contact:
   

Re: Oklahoma City Thunder Regular Season 2015-2016 Part 2 

Post#1742 » by Andre Roberstan » Mon Jan 11, 2016 10:09 pm

getrichordie wrote:
dbrandon wrote:getrichordie, just so I don't come off like a complete tool, the reason I'm laughing at this is because we've actually had a thread on Serge's trade value over on the T&T board. You may find the responses illuminating. Suffice it to say he's worth a little more than that.

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=1417189


I think you guys misunderstood me. I wasn't saying that Lavoy Allen was the primary guy we are trading for. I'm talking about trading Serge for a starter + rotation guys. I'm not just saying make Allen the starter. I'm talking about making Allen a rotation guy along with another PF for Collison and Ibaka. In return we get some pieces for the bench. Maybe my wording was poor.

But I was thinking this:

Ibaka + parts

for

Starting PF + Allen + Stuckey

in a three team trade of course.


I really think you can dream bigger.
Image
User avatar
bondom34
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 66,716
And1: 50,290
Joined: Mar 01, 2013

Re: Oklahoma City Thunder Regular Season 2015-2016 Part 2 

Post#1743 » by bondom34 » Mon Jan 11, 2016 10:45 pm

dbrandon wrote:
getrichordie wrote:
dbrandon wrote:getrichordie, just so I don't come off like a complete tool, the reason I'm laughing at this is because we've actually had a thread on Serge's trade value over on the T&T board. You may find the responses illuminating. Suffice it to say he's worth a little more than that.

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=1417189


I think you guys misunderstood me. I wasn't saying that Lavoy Allen was the primary guy we are trading for. I'm talking about trading Serge for a starter + rotation guys. I'm not just saying make Allen the starter. I'm talking about making Allen a rotation guy along with another PF for Collison and Ibaka. In return we get some pieces for the bench. Maybe my wording was poor.

But I was thinking this:

Ibaka + parts

for

Starting PF + Allen + Stuckey

in a three team trade of course.


I really think you can dream bigger.

I'm also baffled as to why Allen and Stuckey. Its 2 really mediocre bench players.
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO
User avatar
Pillendreher
RealGM
Posts: 14,191
And1: 9,953
Joined: Jan 25, 2015
 

Re: Oklahoma City Thunder Regular Season 2015-2016 Part 2 

Post#1744 » by Pillendreher » Mon Jan 11, 2016 11:23 pm

We could get Allen for Waiters+Filler.
"I don't know of any player that, when the shot goes up, he doesn't want it to go in," Donovan said
User avatar
getrichordie
General Manager
Posts: 9,425
And1: 2,313
Joined: Oct 22, 2015
 

Re: Oklahoma City Thunder Regular Season 2015-2016 Part 2 

Post#1745 » by getrichordie » Mon Jan 11, 2016 11:25 pm

bondom34 wrote:
dbrandon wrote:
getrichordie wrote:
I think you guys misunderstood me. I wasn't saying that Lavoy Allen was the primary guy we are trading for. I'm talking about trading Serge for a starter + rotation guys. I'm not just saying make Allen the starter. I'm talking about making Allen a rotation guy along with another PF for Collison and Ibaka. In return we get some pieces for the bench. Maybe my wording was poor.

But I was thinking this:

Ibaka + parts

for

Starting PF + Allen + Stuckey

in a three team trade of course.


I really think you can dream bigger.

I'm also baffled as to why Allen and Stuckey. Its 2 really mediocre bench players.


I'd like to here a trade scenario where we can get an upgrade over Collison and Waiters and not downgrade at PF that much.
[twitter] @thunderdustin
Andre Roberstan
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 10,527
And1: 6,865
Joined: Jun 23, 2015
Contact:
   

Re: Oklahoma City Thunder Regular Season 2015-2016 Part 2 

Post#1746 » by Andre Roberstan » Mon Jan 11, 2016 11:31 pm

getrichordie wrote:I'd like to here a trade scenario where we can get an upgrade over Collison and Waiters and not downgrade at PF that much.


You can read the thread that I linked. It's worth it, I promise.
Image
KD35Brah
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,398
And1: 3,024
Joined: May 11, 2014

Re: Oklahoma City Thunder Regular Season 2015-2016 Part 2 

Post#1747 » by KD35Brah » Mon Jan 11, 2016 11:52 pm

Image

Image
User avatar
bondom34
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 66,716
And1: 50,290
Joined: Mar 01, 2013

Re: Oklahoma City Thunder Regular Season 2015-2016 Part 2 

Post#1748 » by bondom34 » Tue Jan 12, 2016 12:30 am

getrichordie wrote:
bondom34 wrote:
dbrandon wrote:
I really think you can dream bigger.

I'm also baffled as to why Allen and Stuckey. Its 2 really mediocre bench players.


I'd like to here a trade scenario where we can get an upgrade over Collison and Waiters and not downgrade at PF that much.

Amir Johnson, Avery Bradley, and a first. Collison's fine. And you can upgrade Dion w/o moving Ibaka. I have zero idea what trading him does other than get rid of KD while its happening.
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO
User avatar
spearsy23
RealGM
Posts: 19,481
And1: 7,654
Joined: Jan 27, 2012
   

Re: Oklahoma City Thunder Regular Season 2015-2016 Part 2 

Post#1749 » by spearsy23 » Tue Jan 12, 2016 3:27 am

I didn't watch the game or bother looking at the box score, then I get in here and I'm seeing talk about trading Serge for crap... I can only assume he punched a ref in the face, told Donovan to **** off, and pulled a gun on KD in the locker room.
“If you're getting stops and you're making threes and the other team's not scoring, that's when you're going to see a huge point difference there,” coach Billy Donovan said.
User avatar
spearsy23
RealGM
Posts: 19,481
And1: 7,654
Joined: Jan 27, 2012
   

Re: Oklahoma City Thunder Regular Season 2015-2016 Part 2 

Post#1750 » by spearsy23 » Tue Jan 12, 2016 3:37 am

Pillendreher wrote:
getrichordie wrote:It's like fundamentals went out the window with this team.


The problem is they were never there to begin with. We always got by with talent alone but we never were a team that won because of fundamentaly sound basketball. Maybe Scott Brooks' 'Play hard and have fun' was a little bit too much, huh? This quote sums it up quice nicely (from DT):

I will say this again we win games with talent, gsw/spurs/cavs win games with schemes and plans . Until we have the coaching in place to do this we are up **** creek.

Everything will be Scott's fault from now until the end of time :lol:

It's amazing how we were much more consistent, played better defense, rebounded better and looked more aggressive under him but people still want to blame him for things going badly.
“If you're getting stops and you're making threes and the other team's not scoring, that's when you're going to see a huge point difference there,” coach Billy Donovan said.
Marcus50
Junior
Posts: 417
And1: 85
Joined: May 12, 2013

Re: Oklahoma City Thunder Regular Season 2015-2016 Part 2 

Post#1751 » by Marcus50 » Tue Jan 12, 2016 4:59 am

Presti played his cards last year and Portland called his bluff. I don't know that OKC has anything of value to trade for a decent two way SG. McFluffy perhaps, Dion is the kings new clothes of a player, Kanters defense is too flawed and his contract is too ugly. Morrow maybe, DJ Maybe. Novaks expiring contract. None of these options are going to get us anyone who would really add value
User avatar
spearsy23
RealGM
Posts: 19,481
And1: 7,654
Joined: Jan 27, 2012
   

Re: Oklahoma City Thunder Regular Season 2015-2016 Part 2 

Post#1752 » by spearsy23 » Tue Jan 12, 2016 6:07 am

Marcus50 wrote:Presti played his cards last year and Portland called his bluff. I don't know that OKC has anything of value to trade for a decent two way SG. McFluffy perhaps, Dion is the kings new clothes of a player, Kanters defense is too flawed and his contract is too ugly. Morrow maybe, DJ Maybe. Novaks expiring contract. None of these options are going to get us anyone who would really add value

There is zero doubt in my mind that Kanter has value around the league. I'd be shocked if he isn't traded during this offseason or next.
“If you're getting stops and you're making threes and the other team's not scoring, that's when you're going to see a huge point difference there,” coach Billy Donovan said.
User avatar
Pillendreher
RealGM
Posts: 14,191
And1: 9,953
Joined: Jan 25, 2015
 

Re: Oklahoma City Thunder Regular Season 2015-2016 Part 2 

Post#1753 » by Pillendreher » Tue Jan 12, 2016 9:41 am

spearsy23 wrote:
Pillendreher wrote:
getrichordie wrote:It's like fundamentals went out the window with this team.


The problem is they were never there to begin with. We always got by with talent alone but we never were a team that won because of fundamentaly sound basketball. Maybe Scott Brooks' 'Play hard and have fun' was a little bit too much, huh? This quote sums it up quice nicely (from DT):

I will say this again we win games with talent, gsw/spurs/cavs win games with schemes and plans . Until we have the coaching in place to do this we are up **** creek.

Everything will be Scott's fault from now until the end of time :lol:

It's amazing how we were much more consistent, played better defense, rebounded better and looked more aggressive under him but people still want to blame him for things going badly.


Scotty has his flaws. You can't deny that.
"I don't know of any player that, when the shot goes up, he doesn't want it to go in," Donovan said
User avatar
spearsy23
RealGM
Posts: 19,481
And1: 7,654
Joined: Jan 27, 2012
   

Re: Oklahoma City Thunder Regular Season 2015-2016 Part 2 

Post#1754 » by spearsy23 » Tue Jan 12, 2016 10:01 am

Pillendreher wrote:
spearsy23 wrote:
Pillendreher wrote:
The problem is they were never there to begin with. We always got by with talent alone but we never were a team that won because of fundamentaly sound basketball. Maybe Scott Brooks' 'Play hard and have fun' was a little bit too much, huh? This quote sums it up quice nicely (from DT):


Everything will be Scott's fault from now until the end of time :lol:

It's amazing how we were much more consistent, played better defense, rebounded better and looked more aggressive under him but people still want to blame him for things going badly.


Scotty has his flaws. You can't deny that.

Did he? Sure. I mean he isn't Pop, he was rigid with his rotations, he had an unimaginative offense, he was over reliant on KD and Russ. But it's awfully strange that Donovan comes in and the rotations suck, the offense is even more reliant on KD and Russ, the team is incredibly inconsistent both in terms of play and effort, and every player except Westbrook looks worse than they have previously in their careers. I thought maybe we were done making up things to criticize Brooks about now that we moved on, but here we are. I'm sick and tired of a very good NBA coach being the fan's whipping boy and the front office's scape-goat. Scott Brooks was a top 5 NBA coach and 'we' ran him out of town because of some minor flaws that were exaggerated by an impatient fan base and a media with an agenda.

Was Scott Brooks ever going to be Pops or Phil? No. He isn't an all time great coach that will LEAD the team to a championship. But most championship coaches aren't that. Most are Spoe or Doc or Larry Brown, guys that excel at certain aspects and can guide a great roster. Hell, Donovan may even be that one day and I hope he gets there soon, but for right now let's quit with this stupid bull**** where we continue piling crap on a great coach and person so that we can excuse his failures.
“If you're getting stops and you're making threes and the other team's not scoring, that's when you're going to see a huge point difference there,” coach Billy Donovan said.
User avatar
Pillendreher
RealGM
Posts: 14,191
And1: 9,953
Joined: Jan 25, 2015
 

Re: Oklahoma City Thunder Regular Season 2015-2016 Part 2 

Post#1755 » by Pillendreher » Tue Jan 12, 2016 1:38 pm

Scott Brooks was not a 'very good' or 'great' NBA coach, come on now. I was never a Brooks fan, but I think he was the right choice for the first few years: He got the young guys to buy in, created a nice environment. But afterwards, despite his incredible bad luck, I was always waiting for the next stept, you know, become a smart, savy team.

The things that aren't working now were mostly there before Donovan; it's not like we were blowing every other team out of the water with Brooks. But you have to ask yourself: What stayed with Donovan gone? The players and the GM. And I think that's what you have to look at. You have to hold both the team and the management accountable. Why isn't Durant playing with more agressiveness? Why aren't we rebounding on the defensive end? How on earth is Dion Waiters still getting minutes?
"I don't know of any player that, when the shot goes up, he doesn't want it to go in," Donovan said
User avatar
bondom34
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 66,716
And1: 50,290
Joined: Mar 01, 2013

Re: Oklahoma City Thunder Regular Season 2015-2016 Part 2 

Post#1756 » by bondom34 » Tue Jan 12, 2016 1:57 pm

Pillendreher wrote:Scott Brooks was not a 'very good' or 'great' NBA coach, come on now. I was never a Brooks fan, but I think he was the right choice for the first few years: He got the young guys to buy in, created a nice environment. But afterwards, despite his incredible bad luck, I was always waiting for the next stept, you know, become a smart, savy team.

The things that aren't working now were mostly there before Donovan; it's not like we were blowing every other team out of the water with Brooks. But you have to ask yourself: What stayed with Donovan gone? The players and the GM. And I think that's what you have to look at. You have to hold both the team and the management accountable. Why isn't Durant playing with more agressiveness? Why aren't we rebounding on the defensive end? How on earth is Dion Waiters still getting minutes?

The defense worked with Brooks. The offense was the same. The rotations made sense w/ Brooks. Brooks at some point when Lillard was hitting everything and scoring 17 in 3 minutes woulda thought "Maybe I should call a timeout.". He was a very good coach to me as well, and better than what they've got now to me at least in game.
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO
User avatar
Pillendreher
RealGM
Posts: 14,191
And1: 9,953
Joined: Jan 25, 2015
 

Re: Oklahoma City Thunder Regular Season 2015-2016 Part 2 

Post#1757 » by Pillendreher » Tue Jan 12, 2016 2:57 pm

But are the rotations really that different? I mean besides Donovan throwing in guys for 2 min, what is he doing different than Brooks rotation wise? Maybe less staggering concerning Durant and Westbrook, but other than that?
"I don't know of any player that, when the shot goes up, he doesn't want it to go in," Donovan said
User avatar
bondom34
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 66,716
And1: 50,290
Joined: Mar 01, 2013

Re: Oklahoma City Thunder Regular Season 2015-2016 Part 2 

Post#1758 » by bondom34 » Tue Jan 12, 2016 3:19 pm

Pillendreher wrote:But are the rotations really that different? I mean besides Donovan throwing in guys for 2 min, what is he doing different than Brooks rotation wise? Maybe less staggering concerning Durant and Westbrook, but other than that?

There have been multiple times where he's thrown out lineups that feature no players who are capable defensively and the opponent goes on a quick run. A Kanter/Collison/Waiters/Morrow/backup PG lineup for 5 minutes to start a quarter. A Kanter/McGary frontcourt was poor Mitch's reintroduction to the lineup. Kanter and Adams never really play with each other.
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO
KD35Brah
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,398
And1: 3,024
Joined: May 11, 2014

Re: Oklahoma City Thunder Regular Season 2015-2016 Part 2 

Post#1759 » by KD35Brah » Tue Jan 12, 2016 3:38 pm

Brooks also had the luxury of playing Durant 39mpg and a useful collison(which was a huge part of our team).
User avatar
Pillendreher
RealGM
Posts: 14,191
And1: 9,953
Joined: Jan 25, 2015
 

Re: Oklahoma City Thunder Regular Season 2015-2016 Part 2 

Post#1760 » by Pillendreher » Tue Jan 12, 2016 4:11 pm

I just picked this up on DT: KD, Adams and Russ are the only guys on our team with a positive RPM. That's just insane.

Westbrook (10.48) | Payne (-2.03) | Augustin (-2.67)
Roberson (-1.17) | Waiters (-4.70) | Morrow (-0.85)
Durant (6.32) | Singler (-2.49)
Ibaka (-1.23) | Collison (-1.11
Adams (1.19) | Kanter (-1.08)

The Warriors have 7 players in the top 65 on RPM. Spurs have 8 in the top 70.

This makes me sad.

EDIT: Same goes for BPM:

The Thunder have 5 players that are positive in BPM (Westbrook, Durant, Payne, Roberson, Adams). The Spurs have 13 guys, the Warriors 7, the Cavs have 7 and the Clippers have 7 as well.
"I don't know of any player that, when the shot goes up, he doesn't want it to go in," Donovan said

Return to Oklahoma City Thunder