2017 OKC Thunder Trade Discussion

Moderators: retrobro90, Dadouv47

User avatar
bondom34
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 66,716
And1: 50,290
Joined: Mar 01, 2013

Re: 2017 OKC Thunder Trade Discussion 

Post#841 » by bondom34 » Wed Feb 22, 2017 4:44 pm

spearsy23 wrote:
bondom34 wrote:
spearsy23 wrote:Because it didn't work. You're conflating what actually happened with their intentions. They built around Dwight and harden and when it didn't work they built around harden, just like we built around cupcake and Russ and when it didn't work were just didn't bother building and decided Sam would take the year off instead.

So wait, Morey failed (worse) for years, and decided not to even try to sign Dwight (who you say they were building around).


In that case, why not compare it to Presti telling Durant not to even sign in OKC? Because that's essentially what Houston did.

What exactly does any of this have to do with the argument that presti has done a **** job building around Russ and Morey did a good job getting players that fit around Harden? Both teams had 2 stars for the last 3 years, both teams lost one this off-season, one built a team and the other traded a better player, fit, and daft pick for jerami grant.

Wait you're comparing Houston not even trying to keep an inferior player who didn't fit to Durant? Yeah I don't think this is going anywhere.
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO
Kizz Fastfists
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,439
And1: 1,870
Joined: Jun 05, 2014
   

Re: 2017 OKC Thunder Trade Discussion 

Post#842 » by Kizz Fastfists » Wed Feb 22, 2017 4:45 pm

spearsy23 wrote:What exactly does any of this have to do with the argument that presti has done a **** job building around Russ and Morey did a good job getting players that fit around Harden? Both teams had 2 stars for the last 3 years, both teams lost one this off-season, one built a team and the other traded a better player, fit, and daft pick for jerami grant.



One was wanting that player to leave and had set themselves up with lots of cap space. The other was expecting the player to stay and had built the team around them staying, including using all their space.
"The secret to success is to offend the greatest number of people." -George Bernard Shaw
User avatar
Osirus89
Starter
Posts: 2,148
And1: 2,017
Joined: Nov 23, 2016
   

Re: 2017 OKC Thunder Trade Discussion 

Post#843 » by Osirus89 » Wed Feb 22, 2017 4:52 pm

Balkman32 wrote:Who's the more likely to be traded: Singler or Morrow?

Morrow
Balkman32 wrote:Who's the more likely to be traded: Roberson or Payne?

Both

Knrstz wrote:Can't anyone explain why we traded a draft pick for Jerami Grant? That still hacks me off. I've never heard a good reason for it.

There is no good reason for that trade. I still hate the Kanter deal so you can imagine my joy about owing Philly a first rounder for a second round player. Also Jerami Grant may have cost the team the opportunity to add Wilson Chandler or Gallo since there is no first rounder. At this point I would be fine with coming away with Bogdonavich and McLemore for the second half of the season. Better than nothing. The clock will start ticking this offseason. Presti needs to do something meaningful this offseason. If it takes offloading Oladipo AND Kanter to do it. Teams are getting better. New Orleans will be a threat next year. If they leapfrog the Thunder next year, that leaves us as the 8th seed if things stay the same. Its going to be harder for us to climb the standings in the coming season, not easier.
I'll avoid a rant on Presti if he manages to "at least" address some of the larger holes on the team in trades. But if this team is STILL the same on Thursday at 3 pm....
Balkman32
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,825
And1: 808
Joined: Jul 19, 2007
 

Re: 2017 OKC Thunder Trade Discussion 

Post#844 » by Balkman32 » Wed Feb 22, 2017 5:02 pm

Knrstz wrote:Can't anyone explain why we traded a draft pick for Jerami Grant? That still hacks me off. I've never heard a good reason for it.


So this pick is only valid for one year and it is only valid for picks 21-30. So lets say we give the Jazz out pick in 2018 because we are not in the lottery. The pick to Phila would then be in 2020 protected picks 1-20. If the Thunder pick #18 in 2020 then the 6ers will receive 2 second round picks in 2022 and 2023. I think the way it is constructed was great because in theory we could deal a lottery protected 2020 pick that would fall in the following ranges 2020 15-20, 2021 15-30, and 2022 15-30. So we could still deal the pick. Or we could deal a 2020 1-20. Grant must have been a guy they really liked at the end of the day.
User avatar
spearsy23
RealGM
Posts: 19,481
And1: 7,654
Joined: Jan 27, 2012
   

Re: 2017 OKC Thunder Trade Discussion 

Post#845 » by spearsy23 » Wed Feb 22, 2017 5:14 pm

Kizz Fastfists wrote:
spearsy23 wrote:What exactly does any of this have to do with the argument that presti has done a **** job building around Russ and Morey did a good job getting players that fit around Harden? Both teams had 2 stars for the last 3 years, both teams lost one this off-season, one built a team and the other traded a better player, fit, and daft pick for jerami grant.



One was wanting that player to leave and had set themselves up with lots of cap space. The other was expecting the player to stay and had built the team around them staying, including using all their space.

We had 20 million in cap space available plus could have traded kanter for an additional 18 million.
“If you're getting stops and you're making threes and the other team's not scoring, that's when you're going to see a huge point difference there,” coach Billy Donovan said.
User avatar
spearsy23
RealGM
Posts: 19,481
And1: 7,654
Joined: Jan 27, 2012
   

Re: 2017 OKC Thunder Trade Discussion 

Post#846 » by spearsy23 » Wed Feb 22, 2017 5:16 pm

bondom34 wrote:
spearsy23 wrote:
bondom34 wrote:So wait, Morey failed (worse) for years, and decided not to even try to sign Dwight (who you say they were building around).


In that case, why not compare it to Presti telling Durant not to even sign in OKC? Because that's essentially what Houston did.

What exactly does any of this have to do with the argument that presti has done a **** job building around Russ and Morey did a good job getting players that fit around Harden? Both teams had 2 stars for the last 3 years, both teams lost one this off-season, one built a team and the other traded a better player, fit, and daft pick for jerami grant.

Wait you're comparing Houston not even trying to keep an inferior player who didn't fit to Durant? Yeah I don't think this is going anywhere.

No I'm comparing two teams that lost max contract players and how they filled out their rosters afterwards.
“If you're getting stops and you're making threes and the other team's not scoring, that's when you're going to see a huge point difference there,” coach Billy Donovan said.
User avatar
bondom34
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 66,716
And1: 50,290
Joined: Mar 01, 2013

Re: 2017 OKC Thunder Trade Discussion 

Post#847 » by bondom34 » Wed Feb 22, 2017 5:20 pm

spearsy23 wrote:
bondom34 wrote:
spearsy23 wrote:What exactly does any of this have to do with the argument that presti has done a **** job building around Russ and Morey did a good job getting players that fit around Harden? Both teams had 2 stars for the last 3 years, both teams lost one this off-season, one built a team and the other traded a better player, fit, and daft pick for jerami grant.

Wait you're comparing Houston not even trying to keep an inferior player who didn't fit to Durant? Yeah I don't think this is going anywhere.

No I'm comparing two teams that lost max contract players and how they filled out their rosters afterwards.

All max players aren't equal.

And look at the roster as it would have been had it been planned.

Russ/Robes/Cupcake/Sabonis/Adams

Cam/VO/whoever/Kanter

The difference is Dwight could be replaced pretty easily for what was asked of him.
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO
User avatar
Old Man Game
Head Coach
Posts: 6,281
And1: 4,317
Joined: Jul 15, 2012

Re: RE: Re: 2017 OKC Thunder Trade Discussion 

Post#848 » by Old Man Game » Wed Feb 22, 2017 5:37 pm

spearsy23 wrote:Mcdaniels is still riding that hot 3 point shooting month he had to start his career. The guy isn't good at all. Basically a smaller jerami grant.

I think Zach's point was just to take a flier on him since he's an athletic wing, which is a commodity in this league & the prospect of him figuring out how to shoot isn't completely outside the realm of possibility.
User avatar
spearsy23
RealGM
Posts: 19,481
And1: 7,654
Joined: Jan 27, 2012
   

Re: 2017 OKC Thunder Trade Discussion 

Post#849 » by spearsy23 » Wed Feb 22, 2017 5:39 pm

bondom34 wrote:
spearsy23 wrote:
bondom34 wrote:Wait you're comparing Houston not even trying to keep an inferior player who didn't fit to Durant? Yeah I don't think this is going anywhere.

No I'm comparing two teams that lost max contract players and how they filled out their rosters afterwards.

All max players aren't equal.

And look at the roster as it would have been had it been planned.

Russ/Robes/Cupcake/Sabonis/Adams

Cam/VO/whoever/Kanter

The difference is Dwight could be replaced pretty easily for what was asked of him.

That roster is very underwhelming. 6 guys that are rotation caliber players, no power forward worth playing, horrid spacing.

And it has nothing to do with replacing production, it's about filling out a roster with
A) NBA players
B) two way players
C) guys that accentuate Russ's greatness instead of holding him back.
“If you're getting stops and you're making threes and the other team's not scoring, that's when you're going to see a huge point difference there,” coach Billy Donovan said.
User avatar
spearsy23
RealGM
Posts: 19,481
And1: 7,654
Joined: Jan 27, 2012
   

Re: RE: Re: 2017 OKC Thunder Trade Discussion 

Post#850 » by spearsy23 » Wed Feb 22, 2017 5:41 pm

Old Man Game wrote:
spearsy23 wrote:Mcdaniels is still riding that hot 3 point shooting month he had to start his career. The guy isn't good at all. Basically a smaller jerami grant.

I think Zach's point was just to take a flier on him since he's an athletic wing, which is a commodity in this league & the prospect of him figuring out how to shoot isn't completely outside the realm of possibility.

As long as its not us riding that rollercoastet again. Lb
“If you're getting stops and you're making threes and the other team's not scoring, that's when you're going to see a huge point difference there,” coach Billy Donovan said.
User avatar
bondom34
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 66,716
And1: 50,290
Joined: Mar 01, 2013

Re: 2017 OKC Thunder Trade Discussion 

Post#851 » by bondom34 » Wed Feb 22, 2017 5:54 pm

spearsy23 wrote:
bondom34 wrote:
spearsy23 wrote:No I'm comparing two teams that lost max contract players and how they filled out their rosters afterwards.

All max players aren't equal.

And look at the roster as it would have been had it been planned.

Russ/Robes/Cupcake/Sabonis/Adams

Cam/VO/whoever/Kanter

The difference is Dwight could be replaced pretty easily for what was asked of him.

That roster is very underwhelming. 6 guys that are rotation caliber players, no power forward worth playing, horrid spacing.

And it has nothing to do with replacing production, it's about filling out a roster with
A) NBA players
B) two way players
C) guys that accentuate Russ's greatness instead of holding him back.

Look, I don't disagree right now the roster isn't great. But it was built entirely for a skillset of a player who's been replaced by his polar opposite. If this is the team going into next year, yea I'm gonna be annoyed then. Not now.
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO
User avatar
spearsy23
RealGM
Posts: 19,481
And1: 7,654
Joined: Jan 27, 2012
   

Re: 2017 OKC Thunder Trade Discussion 

Post#852 » by spearsy23 » Wed Feb 22, 2017 6:01 pm

http://hoopshype.com/2017/02/21/this-is-how-trades-go-down-in-the-nba/

Makes me feel a lot better about not hearing any real chatter.
“If you're getting stops and you're making threes and the other team's not scoring, that's when you're going to see a huge point difference there,” coach Billy Donovan said.
Balkman32
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,825
And1: 808
Joined: Jul 19, 2007
 

Re: 2017 OKC Thunder Trade Discussion 

Post#853 » by Balkman32 » Wed Feb 22, 2017 6:15 pm

spearsy23 wrote:
Knrstz wrote:Can't anyone explain why we traded a draft pick for Jerami Grant? That still hacks me off. I've never heard a good reason for it.

Forget the draft pick, why would we even trade ilyasova for grant?


LOL - To use that 7 million in the next 26 hours....
User avatar
ThunderBolt
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 19,365
And1: 19,225
Joined: Dec 29, 2016
Location: Lynnwood, WA
   

Re: 2017 OKC Thunder Trade Discussion 

Post#854 » by ThunderBolt » Wed Feb 22, 2017 6:30 pm

Pacers assessing trade value for Paul George. Give them the farm.
bisme37 wrote:If there were magnets in basketballs so strong they changed the path of the ball as it flew through the air, wouldn't the ball then stick magnetically to the rim when it got there?
Balkman32
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,825
And1: 808
Joined: Jul 19, 2007
 

Re: 2017 OKC Thunder Trade Discussion 

Post#855 » by Balkman32 » Wed Feb 22, 2017 6:37 pm

Knrstz wrote:Pacers assessing trade value for Paul George. Give them the farm.


Yep! Anyone but Russ. We might have to take a Monta Ellis and/or Al Jefferson to make it worth their while.
User avatar
Pillendreher
RealGM
Posts: 14,191
And1: 9,953
Joined: Jan 25, 2015
 

Re: 2017 OKC Thunder Trade Discussion 

Post#856 » by Pillendreher » Wed Feb 22, 2017 6:40 pm

Knrstz wrote:Pacers assessing trade value for Paul George. Give them the farm.


Image
"I don't know of any player that, when the shot goes up, he doesn't want it to go in," Donovan said
User avatar
ThunderBolt
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 19,365
And1: 19,225
Joined: Dec 29, 2016
Location: Lynnwood, WA
   

Re: 2017 OKC Thunder Trade Discussion 

Post#857 » by ThunderBolt » Wed Feb 22, 2017 6:53 pm

If they would take it, I would do it. I knew we didn't have the assets to make these type of deals but now that it's here, it really sucks.
bisme37 wrote:If there were magnets in basketballs so strong they changed the path of the ball as it flew through the air, wouldn't the ball then stick magnetically to the rim when it got there?
MjolnirOKC
Ballboy
Posts: 7
And1: 3
Joined: Feb 13, 2017
     

Re: 2017 OKC Thunder Trade Discussion 

Post#858 » by MjolnirOKC » Wed Feb 22, 2017 6:57 pm

Kanter and Dipo are on the table at the moment. Rumor is pushing to IND for PG or CHI for JB. Highly unlikely either move happens, but the FO is trying.
Dadouv47
Forum Mod - Thunder
Forum Mod - Thunder
Posts: 13,413
And1: 7,553
Joined: Mar 22, 2015
   

Re: 2017 OKC Thunder Trade Discussion 

Post#859 » by Dadouv47 » Wed Feb 22, 2017 6:57 pm

I don't know how, but if we can get him, I would definitely do it. Worth the gamble ( and give us better odds to sign a good free agent during the offseason).
Balkman32
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,825
And1: 808
Joined: Jul 19, 2007
 

Re: 2017 OKC Thunder Trade Discussion 

Post#860 » by Balkman32 » Wed Feb 22, 2017 7:01 pm

MjolnirOKC wrote:Kanter and Dipo are on the table at the moment. Rumor is pushing to IND for PG or CHI for JB. Highly unlikely either move happens, but the FO is trying.


Both are young helps franchise re-set but its gonna come down to what Boston wants to do. The ball is in their court because they have the #1 overall pick.

Return to Oklahoma City Thunder