Collison trade

Moderators: Dadouv47, retrobro90

ssfan4life
Sophomore
Posts: 101
And1: 2
Joined: Jan 27, 2007

Collison trade 

Post#1 » by ssfan4life » Sun Jul 26, 2009 5:53 am

Travis Outlaw and Steve Blake for Nick Collison. Thoughts?
User avatar
wiff
Head Coach
Posts: 6,887
And1: 21
Joined: Jul 22, 2006
Location: Gettin da boot!

Re: Collison trade 

Post#2 » by wiff » Sun Jul 26, 2009 7:12 am

Well considering both those guys are expirings I think it would make sense for OKC. But that's the only reason.

I guess Blake would be a decent back up but Travis Outlaw (who I like) would not really find many minutes.

If OKC is simply looking to clear cap I can see them doing this. But there is also the whole not trading within the division rule being broke here.

It's not a bad idea I just don't see it actually happening.
wizkid27
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 2,636
And1: 166
Joined: Jun 21, 2004
Location: Indianapolis
   

Re: Collison trade 

Post#3 » by wizkid27 » Sun Jul 26, 2009 12:48 pm

Yeah, I'd go for it. I think that we get the better end of the deal (expiring contracts and a little more talent). I think that, because Collison doesn't really look to be a part of the long-term puzzle here, a lot of our views on him are a little bit lower than they should be.

I think it we had Outlaw, it would probably squeeze Weaver completely out of the rotation (which I'm fine with, I think he's the weakest link right now). Blake would probably take most of Livingston's minutes, which I'm less fine with, but it would make us much better next season.

Outlaw would provide the bench scoring that we seriously lack and Blake would provide a steady point guard to reign things in if the Harden/Westbrook tandem proves to be too volatile.
HomieOmey
Head Coach
Posts: 6,063
And1: 563
Joined: Jun 29, 2009
Location: TO
Contact:

Re: Collison trade 

Post#4 » by HomieOmey » Sun Jul 26, 2009 9:03 pm

Decent deal for both sides, not the greatest for either though.
Image
TurboZ

Return to Oklahoma City Thunder