b_roy7 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
I know, really. Only 1/10 of the posts have actually been related to the game.
I agree and thats why I suggested we just drop it. Hell, I've even said I'd be willing to make a deal with the guy despite what happened with us previously. I just refuse to let him play the victim. He complains about his reputation being tarnished but 2 different people made trades with him involving the same protected Knicks first rounder and both complained afterwards that the deal wasn't what they agree to. I don't think he has any right to play the victim and that is my point.
In any case, as long as people are extra cautious with him in the future I don't see any reason why he can't still be in the game. Maybe next time someone makes a trade with him they can insist on posting the original deal and have him quote the acceptance. It isn't a complicated situation. I think this issue with the trades has been discussed to death and since the other guy isn't as pissed off at the situation as I was I think the league should just make a call regarding this trade so we can move on. The league is letting this thing drag on for too long.