ImageImageImageImageImage

Why not Marbury

Moderators: montestewart, LyricalRico, nate33

miller31time
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 27,575
And1: 2,141
Joined: Jul 25, 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
     

Re: Why not Marbury 

Post#61 » by miller31time » Sun Dec 7, 2008 7:35 am

pancakes3 wrote:i'll agree with that if you agree that even overrated, he's still better than any option we currently have at pg.


And I'll agree with that if you agree that we should have no interest in possibly improving our win-total by a few games when the only goals of this team should be developing youth and racking up losses.
User avatar
Kanyewest
RealGM
Posts: 10,342
And1: 2,717
Joined: Jul 05, 2004

Re: Why not Marbury 

Post#62 » by Kanyewest » Sun Dec 7, 2008 6:04 pm

greendale wrote:
Kanyewest wrote:[So in conclusion, Marbury isn't a cancer but the guys who replaced Marbury; (Cassell, Kidd, Nash) are all much better.


So a number of teams have horribly over-valued Marbury. The guy's worth is vastly overrated. Is that a reasonable compromise?


Actually, I think he's underrated; right now anyways. He did have some minor success in the playoffs with the Suns. He helped take the Spurs to 6 games, in a year where the Spurs ended up winning the title. People also forget that the Suns started off slowly the following season because Amare Stoudemire got injured.

Granted in New York, he was given a contract he didn't deserve. But that seemed to be the case for several Knicks (Jerome James, Jamal Crawford, Eddy Curry, Jared Jeffries, Allan Houston). The Knicks with the help of Layden and Isiah Thomas became a Raideresque organization where few players could achieve success. Even Larry Brown couldn't turn it around.

Return to Washington Wizards