Ruzious wrote:CntOutSmrtCrazy wrote:Ruzious wrote:I watched the 1st 3 quarters - Bryant really stood out as the best player in the game and played maybe 20 minutes. He made 4 "and 1's" that I saw. It's become clear to me that the team HAS to re-sign him - moreso than Sato - who I love to watch - but Sato's 6 or so years older, so we know what his ceiling is. Bryant's already good and should be one of the building blocks of the organization.
Why not try Bryant and Portis together against teams that don't have bigs that are great 3 point shooters? It's not like the Wiz have a real PF. Green doesn't rebound at all and isn't much of an interior defender.
I was thinking the same about Bryant and Portis myself last night. They both seem to have enough shooting ability to not make it a liability.
See, brilliant minds think alike. Yeah, offensively I think they can mesh very well. Defense is a question especially against teams with good outside shooting bigs - as they'll have trouble closing out on 3's.
Not to bring down the average, but I was wondering the same thing -- why isn't Brooks playing Portis & Bryant at the same time?
In fact, if he did, then he could play Dekker at the 3 for rebounding, defense & efficient 2 pt. shooting -- both Bobby & Thomas shoot the 3 really well, so spacing seems unlikely to suffer.
Instead, we're playing Ariza 37 minutes a game & encouraging him to take over eight 3's per 40 minutes at 31%. Brilliant, huh?
Especially brilliant since Dekker & Ariza score the same # of points per 40 minutes but Dekker does it slightly more efficiently than Ariza -- & also out-rebounds Ariza by about 35%, steals the ball more often than Trevor, & turns it over less often.
Go figure.