ImageImageImageImageImage

Official Trade Thread - Part XLII

Moderators: nate33, montestewart, LyricalRico

Ruzious
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 47,909
And1: 11,582
Joined: Jul 17, 2001
       

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XLII 

Post#1181 » by Ruzious » Wed Jan 19, 2022 11:56 pm

dckingsfan wrote:
FAH1223 wrote:

Not sure how we get in on this one? Guess it doesn't matter if the Sixers aren't interested? And would we do this?

Washington: Haliburton, Hield, Barnes + 2 firsts
Philly: Beal, Bertans, Bagley, Harrell
Sacramento: Harris, Simmons, Thybulle

I'd do it if those picks are Sac's 2022 and 2024 picks.

I'd like it even more if we could flip Barnes to a 3rd team in exchange for more picks.

Any chance we could end up with Thybulle and leave Barnes with Sacramento?
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams
User avatar
gambitx777
RealGM
Posts: 10,561
And1: 1,991
Joined: Dec 18, 2012

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XLII 

Post#1182 » by gambitx777 » Thu Jan 20, 2022 12:22 am

I don't understand what DM is thinking. Like if some of these offers are real? How on earth have they not jumped on them?

Sent from my SM-G991U1 using RealGM mobile app
dckingsfan
RealGM
Posts: 35,050
And1: 20,530
Joined: May 28, 2010

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XLII 

Post#1183 » by dckingsfan » Thu Jan 20, 2022 12:22 am

Ruzious wrote:
dckingsfan wrote:
FAH1223 wrote:

Not sure how we get in on this one? Guess it doesn't matter if the Sixers aren't interested? And would we do this?

Washington: Haliburton, Hield, Barnes + 2 firsts
Philly: Beal, Bertans, Bagley, Harrell
Sacramento: Harris, Simmons, Thybulle

I'd do it if those picks are Sac's 2022 and 2024 picks.

I'd like it even more if we could flip Barnes to a 3rd team in exchange for more picks.

Any chance we could end up with Thybulle and leave Barnes with Sacramento?

Yeah, it would be nice to be able to add a 4th team that needs Barnes although I wouldn't mind seeing Barnes playing with Kuzma.
9 and 20
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,740
And1: 1,281
Joined: Mar 28, 2021
 

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XLII 

Post#1184 » by 9 and 20 » Thu Jan 20, 2022 2:51 am

Send Bert to one of the contenders who will talk themselves into his shooting being an asset. Lakers, maybe Dallas, maybe Philly. Just get him gone. Guy had one skill and then proceeded to pound too many half smokes, got hurt and out of shape, and now can't shoot anymore. Boo this man.

A little upset about the loss to Fats Harden and moon man Kyrie Irving. Nets are all turds, including their devious coach Vanterpool. That man was my hero and took a dump all over us. He came to us when Chris Whiteny sprained both ankles, both wrists, both shoulders, etc. Saved the day (kinda). And now poops all over us. Damn Vanterpool. Ice cold.
Can't say I do. Who else gonna shoot?
thinker07
Junior
Posts: 360
And1: 75
Joined: Jul 08, 2010

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XLII 

Post#1185 » by thinker07 » Thu Jan 20, 2022 5:51 am

As I ponder the situation, I am becoming more confident that the play that Shep is trying to pull off is going all in for Sabonis. Certainly Deni, probably Harrell or Bryant either directly or to a third team for a pick that goes to Indiana. Maybe one other asset. I could see Kuz somehow being involved if the Wiz think Sabonis will mostly play PF. Maybe Rui.

I'm not saying I think it's a good play, or proposing what I think would be a fair trade -- Just that I think this is what the Wiz would like to do.
Silvie Lysandra
Starter
Posts: 2,193
And1: 463
Joined: May 22, 2007
   

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XLII 

Post#1186 » by Silvie Lysandra » Thu Jan 20, 2022 9:08 am

i would trade beal for sabonis before i'd trade deni for sabonis
Frichuela
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,633
And1: 3,713
Joined: Feb 25, 2015
 

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XLII 

Post#1187 » by Frichuela » Thu Jan 20, 2022 1:07 pm

thinker07 wrote:As I ponder the situation, I am becoming more confident that the play that Shep is trying to pull off is going all in for Sabonis. Certainly Deni, probably Harrell or Bryant either directly or to a third team for a pick that goes to Indiana. Maybe one other asset. I could see Kuz somehow being involved if the Wiz think Sabonis will mostly play PF. Maybe Rui.

I'm not saying I think it's a good play, or proposing what I think would be a fair trade -- Just that I think this is what the Wiz would like to do.


Yes. It appears to be the case…Let’s see how much Sabonis costs if Tommy pulls it off…

For what is worth, Sabonis was instrumental in IND’s defeat of the Lakers last night: 20 pts, 12 reb and 10 ass on 9/12 shooting including 2/2 from 3…
Frichuela
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,633
And1: 3,713
Joined: Feb 25, 2015
 

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XLII 

Post#1188 » by Frichuela » Thu Jan 20, 2022 1:23 pm

A few IND fans in social media are requesting a package around Kuzma+Rui in a hypothetical trade for Sabonis. In Mayo’s latest pod, some IND pundit asked for the same package…
User avatar
gambitx777
RealGM
Posts: 10,561
And1: 1,991
Joined: Dec 18, 2012

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XLII 

Post#1189 » by gambitx777 » Thu Jan 20, 2022 1:35 pm

Frichuela wrote:A few IND fans in social media are requesting a package around Kuzma+Rui in a hypothetical trade for Sabonis. In Mayo’s latest pod, some IND pundit asked for the same package…
At this point I'm not trading Kuz.

Sent from my SM-G991U1 using RealGM mobile app
9 and 20
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,740
And1: 1,281
Joined: Mar 28, 2021
 

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XLII 

Post#1190 » by 9 and 20 » Thu Jan 20, 2022 1:43 pm

Sabonis for Rui and Kuzma is a no brainer.

I'd like to see Tommy try to trade the three guys from the Lakers for as many picks as possible. Kuzma's minutes can be taken by Deni and Rui and I don't think we'd lose much, if anything. KCP's minutes can be taken by Kispert. And Bryant and Gafford plus Gill when necessary can play center. If Tommy can get two first round picks, he can either use them in the draft or use them in a trade for Grant, Sabonis, or whoever else.
Can't say I do. Who else gonna shoot?
User avatar
keynote
General Manager
Posts: 9,422
And1: 2,624
Joined: May 20, 2002
Location: Acceptance
         

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XLII 

Post#1191 » by keynote » Thu Jan 20, 2022 2:43 pm

Frichuela wrote:A few IND fans in social media are requesting a package around Kuzma+Rui in a hypothetical trade for Sabonis. In Mayo’s latest pod, some IND pundit asked for the same package…


Any trade for Sabonis has to include one of our centers going back.
Always remember, my friend: the world will change again. And you may have to come back through everywhere you've been.
payitforward
RealGM
Posts: 24,774
And1: 9,179
Joined: May 02, 2012
Location: On the Atlantic

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XLII 

Post#1192 » by payitforward » Thu Jan 20, 2022 2:50 pm

Ruzious wrote:
dckingsfan wrote:
FAH1223 wrote:

Not sure how we get in on this one? Guess it doesn't matter if the Sixers aren't interested? And would we do this?

Washington: Haliburton, Hield, Barnes + 2 firsts
Philly: Beal, Bertans, Bagley, Harrell
Sacramento: Harris, Simmons, Thybulle

I'd do it if those picks are Sac's 2022 and 2024 picks.

I'd like it even more if we could flip Barnes to a 3rd team in exchange for more picks.

Any chance we could end up with Thybulle and leave Barnes with Sacramento?

Do you think Sac'to would give us Haliburton & 2 R1 picks for Beal straight up? Doesn't seem super likely to me given the season Brad is having & the need to supermax him in a few months.

Maybe I'm wrong...? But, if I'm right, then obviously Harrell doesn't add a whole lot of value in the trade, b/c he is expiring. & Bertans substantially detracts from the value we'd be sending out.

OTOH, if Sac'to is really under pressure to do something "major," then I wonder what they actually would give us for Beal. &... would acquiring Beal be enough incentive for them to let go of Haliburton...?

If they sent us Haliburton, Barnes & Bagley, & we sent them Beal, Hachimura & Gill (just to make it 3 for 3 -- no roster shuffling), what else would have to be attached, & in which direction?
Ruzious
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 47,909
And1: 11,582
Joined: Jul 17, 2001
       

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XLII 

Post#1193 » by Ruzious » Thu Jan 20, 2022 2:56 pm

payitforward wrote:If they sent us Haliburton, Barnes & Bagley, & we sent them Beal, Hachimura & Gill (just to make it 3 for 3 -- no roster shuffling), what else would have to be attached, & in which direction?

A helluvalot more would have to go to Washington in order for it to make any sense for Washington. Don't ya think?
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams
dckingsfan
RealGM
Posts: 35,050
And1: 20,530
Joined: May 28, 2010

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XLII 

Post#1194 » by dckingsfan » Thu Jan 20, 2022 3:05 pm

payitforward wrote:
Ruzious wrote:
dckingsfan wrote:Not sure how we get in on this one? Guess it doesn't matter if the Sixers aren't interested? And would we do this?

Washington: Haliburton, Hield, Barnes + 2 firsts
Philly: Beal, Bertans, Bagley, Harrell
Sacramento: Harris, Simmons, Thybulle

I'd do it if those picks are Sac's 2022 and 2024 picks.

I'd like it even more if we could flip Barnes to a 3rd team in exchange for more picks.

Any chance we could end up with Thybulle and leave Barnes with Sacramento?

Do you think Sac'to would give us Haliburton & 2 R1 picks for Beal straight up? Doesn't seem super likely to me given the season Brad is having & the need to supermax him in a few months.

Maybe I'm wrong...? But, if I'm right, then obviously Harrell doesn't add a whole lot of value in the trade, b/c he is expiring. & Bertans substantially detracts from the value we'd be sending out.

OTOH, if Sac'to is really under pressure to do something "major," then I wonder what they actually would give us for Beal. &... would acquiring Beal be enough incentive for them to let go of Haliburton...?

If they sent us Haliburton, Barnes & Bagley, & we sent them Beal, Hachimura & Gill (just to make it 3 for 3 -- no roster shuffling), what else would have to be attached, & in which direction?

I think no to Beal and Sac - I don't think Sac thinks they could sign Beal in the off-season. Hence why it needs to be 3 teams.
Ruzious
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 47,909
And1: 11,582
Joined: Jul 17, 2001
       

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XLII 

Post#1195 » by Ruzious » Thu Jan 20, 2022 3:10 pm

dckingsfan wrote:
payitforward wrote:
Ruzious wrote:I'd do it if those picks are Sac's 2022 and 2024 picks.

I'd like it even more if we could flip Barnes to a 3rd team in exchange for more picks.

Any chance we could end up with Thybulle and leave Barnes with Sacramento?

Do you think Sac'to would give us Haliburton & 2 R1 picks for Beal straight up? Doesn't seem super likely to me given the season Brad is having & the need to supermax him in a few months.

Maybe I'm wrong...? But, if I'm right, then obviously Harrell doesn't add a whole lot of value in the trade, b/c he is expiring. & Bertans substantially detracts from the value we'd be sending out.

OTOH, if Sac'to is really under pressure to do something "major," then I wonder what they actually would give us for Beal. &... would acquiring Beal be enough incentive for them to let go of Haliburton...?

If they sent us Haliburton, Barnes & Bagley, & we sent them Beal, Hachimura & Gill (just to make it 3 for 3 -- no roster shuffling), what else would have to be attached, & in which direction?

I think no to Beal and Sac - I don't think Sac thinks they could sign Beal in the off-season. Hence why it needs to be 3 teams.

Agreed. What do you think of Terence Davis? He had a helluva game in Hali's absence last night and has some pretty good stats this season.
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams
payitforward
RealGM
Posts: 24,774
And1: 9,179
Joined: May 02, 2012
Location: On the Atlantic

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XLII 

Post#1196 » by payitforward » Thu Jan 20, 2022 3:17 pm

Ruzious wrote:
payitforward wrote:If they sent us Haliburton, Barnes & Bagley, & we sent them Beal, Hachimura & Gill (just to make it 3 for 3 -- no roster shuffling), what else would have to be attached, & in which direction?

A helluvalot more would have to go to Washington in order for it to make any sense for Washington. Don't ya think?

In a sense, obviously, as for us the trade is only about acquiring Haliburton. & the "more" would be picks, obviously.

OTOH, as just pointed out, Beal brings a risk -- can he be re-signed? -- which lowers his value in a trade (in truth... this might have to be worked out in advance for any trade to be possible).
Andrew McCeltic
RealGM
Posts: 23,153
And1: 8,549
Joined: Jun 18, 2004
 

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XLII 

Post#1197 » by Andrew McCeltic » Thu Jan 20, 2022 3:20 pm

Ruzious wrote:
payitforward wrote:If they sent us Haliburton, Barnes & Bagley, & we sent them Beal, Hachimura & Gill (just to make it 3 for 3 -- no roster shuffling), what else would have to be attached, & in which direction?

A helluvalot more would have to go to Washington in order for it to make any sense for Washington. Don't ya think?


If you get 2 unprotected Sacramento 1sts (!! they're dumb enough to do it) and keep Rui, Hield/Barnes/Hali is a decent return for Beal. The picks and Hali are a big return, Barnes is a good short-term piece. Hield's an issue, but it's possible his market changes in a year or two if his percentages go up. It just throws off your roster construction, too many guards.
Ruzious
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 47,909
And1: 11,582
Joined: Jul 17, 2001
       

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XLII 

Post#1198 » by Ruzious » Thu Jan 20, 2022 3:23 pm

Andrew McCeltic wrote:
Ruzious wrote:
payitforward wrote:If they sent us Haliburton, Barnes & Bagley, & we sent them Beal, Hachimura & Gill (just to make it 3 for 3 -- no roster shuffling), what else would have to be attached, & in which direction?

A helluvalot more would have to go to Washington in order for it to make any sense for Washington. Don't ya think?


If you get 2 unprotected Sacramento 1sts (!! they're dumb enough to do it) and keep Rui, Hield/Barnes/Hali is a decent return for Beal. The picks and Hali are a big return, Barnes is a good short-term piece. Hield's an issue, but it's possible his market changes in a year or two if his percentages go up. It just throws off your roster construction, too many guards.

As was said, it'd have to be a 3-team trade - with Beal going to another team.
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams
dckingsfan
RealGM
Posts: 35,050
And1: 20,530
Joined: May 28, 2010

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XLII 

Post#1199 » by dckingsfan » Thu Jan 20, 2022 3:35 pm

Ruzious wrote:
dckingsfan wrote:
payitforward wrote:Do you think Sac'to would give us Haliburton & 2 R1 picks for Beal straight up? Doesn't seem super likely to me given the season Brad is having & the need to supermax him in a few months.

Maybe I'm wrong...? But, if I'm right, then obviously Harrell doesn't add a whole lot of value in the trade, b/c he is expiring. & Bertans substantially detracts from the value we'd be sending out.

OTOH, if Sac'to is really under pressure to do something "major," then I wonder what they actually would give us for Beal. &... would acquiring Beal be enough incentive for them to let go of Haliburton...?

If they sent us Haliburton, Barnes & Bagley, & we sent them Beal, Hachimura & Gill (just to make it 3 for 3 -- no roster shuffling), what else would have to be attached, & in which direction?

I think no to Beal and Sac - I don't think Sac thinks they could sign Beal in the off-season. Hence why it needs to be 3 teams.

Agreed. What do you think of Terence Davis? He had a helluva game in Hali's absence last night and has some pretty good stats this season.

Puzzled. It started off soooo poorly but this month he looks brilliant. I really can't figure him out.
Andrew McCeltic
RealGM
Posts: 23,153
And1: 8,549
Joined: Jun 18, 2004
 

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XLII 

Post#1200 » by Andrew McCeltic » Thu Jan 20, 2022 3:49 pm

Ruzious wrote:
Andrew McCeltic wrote:
Ruzious wrote:A helluvalot more would have to go to Washington in order for it to make any sense for Washington. Don't ya think?


If you get 2 unprotected Sacramento 1sts (!! they're dumb enough to do it) and keep Rui, Hield/Barnes/Hali is a decent return for Beal. The picks and Hali are a big return, Barnes is a good short-term piece. Hield's an issue, but it's possible his market changes in a year or two if his percentages go up. It just throws off your roster construction, too many guards.

As was said, it'd have to be a 3-team trade - with Beal going to another team.


Yeah I thought it was a Beal to Philly, Ben to SAC scenario..

Return to Washington Wizards