Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVII
Moderators: LyricalRico, nate33, montestewart
Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVII
- gtn130
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,512
- And1: 2,740
- Joined: Mar 18, 2009
Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVII
That trade is so bad for the Lakers that it's hard to imagine it ever happening
Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVII
- getrichordie
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,425
- And1: 2,313
- Joined: Oct 22, 2015
-
Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVII
dangermouse wrote:GetRich: what the hell did beal and otto ever do to you? im emotionally hurt by these trades. that you think steven adams, a bunch of junk and a protected first is what they are worth? and we have to give up probably the best young big man prospect we've had in decades for the honour? i wouldn't even feel this hurt as i do now if i found out you had sex with my wife.
Haha! I admit, it was a very rough proposal. There’s a lot of moving pieces so I’m trying to refine it for all sides! I’m getting a better idea of everyone’s value I think.
Let me know what you think about this...
—
Would Washington give...
Beal + Porter Jr. + Mahinmi + Bryant
for...
Adams + Abrines + Ferguson (or Diallo; WAS’s pick of either) + Labissiere + Shumpert + Randolph + future FRP (top 3 prot.; via OKC) + future SRP (SAC’s best) + future SRP (SAC’s best)
?
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM mobile app
[twitter] @thunderdustin
Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVII
- gtn130
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,512
- And1: 2,740
- Joined: Mar 18, 2009
Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVII
getrichordie these trades you're concocting are legitimately awful
Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVII
- TGW
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,412
- And1: 6,819
- Joined: Oct 22, 2010
Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVII
getrichordie wrote:dangermouse wrote:GetRich: what the hell did beal and otto ever do to you? im emotionally hurt by these trades. that you think steven adams, a bunch of junk and a protected first is what they are worth? and we have to give up probably the best young big man prospect we've had in decades for the honour? i wouldn't even feel this hurt as i do now if i found out you had sex with my wife.
Haha! I admit, it was a very rough proposal. There’s a lot of moving pieces so I’m trying to refine it for all sides! I’m getting a better idea of everyone’s value I think.
Let me know what you think about this...
—
Would Washington give...
Beal + Porter Jr. + Mahinmi + Bryant
for...
Adams + Abrines + Ferguson (or Diallo; WAS’s pick of either) + Labissiere + Shumpert + Randolph + future FRP (top 3 prot.; via OKC) + future SRP (SAC’s best) + future SRP (SAC’s best)
?
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM mobile app

What part of "The Wizards don't want or need Adams" don't you get?
Some random troll wrote:Not to sound negative, but this team is owned by an arrogant cheapskate, managed by a moron and coached by an idiot. Recipe for disaster.
Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVII
- getrichordie
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,425
- And1: 2,313
- Joined: Oct 22, 2015
-
Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVII
TGW wrote:getrichordie wrote:dangermouse wrote:GetRich: what the hell did beal and otto ever do to you? im emotionally hurt by these trades. that you think steven adams, a bunch of junk and a protected first is what they are worth? and we have to give up probably the best young big man prospect we've had in decades for the honour? i wouldn't even feel this hurt as i do now if i found out you had sex with my wife.
Haha! I admit, it was a very rough proposal. There’s a lot of moving pieces so I’m trying to refine it for all sides! I’m getting a better idea of everyone’s value I think.
Let me know what you think about this...
—
Would Washington give...
Beal + Porter Jr. + Mahinmi + Bryant
for...
Adams + Abrines + Ferguson (or Diallo; WAS’s pick of either) + Labissiere + Shumpert + Randolph + future FRP (top 3 prot.; via OKC) + future SRP (SAC’s best) + future SRP (SAC’s best)
?
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM mobile app
What part of "The Wizards don't want or need Adams" don't you get?
Why are you so focused on Adams? What about the cap relief and flexibility Washington is gaining here?
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM mobile app
[twitter] @thunderdustin
Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVII
- TGW
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,412
- And1: 6,819
- Joined: Oct 22, 2010
Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVII
getrichordie wrote:TGW wrote:getrichordie wrote:
Haha! I admit, it was a very rough proposal. There’s a lot of moving pieces so I’m trying to refine it for all sides! I’m getting a better idea of everyone’s value I think.
Let me know what you think about this...
—
Would Washington give...
Beal + Porter Jr. + Mahinmi + Bryant
for...
Adams + Abrines + Ferguson (or Diallo; WAS’s pick of either) + Labissiere + Shumpert + Randolph + future FRP (top 3 prot.; via OKC) + future SRP (SAC’s best) + future SRP (SAC’s best)
?
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM mobile app
What part of "The Wizards don't want or need Adams" don't you get?
Why are you so focused on Adams? What about the cap relief and flexibility Washington is gaining here?
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM mobile app
He is the centerpiece of the frickin' package you're offering. Of course I'm going to be focused on that.
And if the Wizards wanted cap relief and some crappy picks for their core players, Beal and Porter would have been traded a long time ago...for a much better package.
Some random troll wrote:Not to sound negative, but this team is owned by an arrogant cheapskate, managed by a moron and coached by an idiot. Recipe for disaster.
Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVII
-
Eli Babak
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 765
- And1: 524
- Joined: Jun 21, 2018
-
Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVII
getrichordie wrote:Why are you so focused on Adams? What about the cap relief and flexibility Washington is gaining here?
Washington isn't FA destination and you saw what Ernie did in 2016 with all that cap space.
It's obvious that (at least) one of Wall/Beal/Porter will be eventually traded. Beal has the most value but moving Wall would be the best for the franchise. Let's pray Lakers are dumb enough to make that trade.
Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVII
- sogood
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,234
- And1: 5,239
- Joined: Jun 27, 2013
Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVII
Rumors is BS IMO. Wow and Windhorst said the Lakers refused to give up Ingram in any deal for Kawhi, they're not going to give the farm for Wall.
Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVII
- getrichordie
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,425
- And1: 2,313
- Joined: Oct 22, 2015
-
Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVII
Eli Babak wrote:getrichordie wrote:Why are you so focused on Adams? What about the cap relief and flexibility Washington is gaining here?
Washington isn't FA destination and you saw what Ernie did in 2016 with all that cap space.
It's obvious that (at least) one of Wall/Beal/Porter will be eventually traded. Beal has the most value but moving Wall would be the best for the franchise. Let's pray Lakers are dumb enough to make that trade.
So are you just saying Washington can’t get better? They are going to have to have to stay close to cap as possible until they figure out who is in their long-term view. The Wall/Beal/Porter ship has sailed and all of them will have to be moved for a prosperous future in Washington. While they figure out who fits into their long-term view, they can at least NOT pay a ton of money.
[twitter] @thunderdustin
Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVII
- nate33
- Forum Mod - Wizards

- Posts: 70,723
- And1: 23,219
- Joined: Oct 28, 2002
Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVII
sogood wrote:Rumors is BS IMO. Wow and Windhorst said the Lakers refused to give up Ingram in any deal for Kawhi, they're not going to give the farm for Wall.
I don't expect the Lakers to give up the farm for Wall. I'd be happy with expiring contracts and one pick/prospect. Whether that's Ball, Ingram, Hart, or a future pick, I don't really care.
I assume that Ball makes the most sense for LA since LA would be getting back a PG in Wall (and Ball also has a bigger contract).
Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVII
- nate33
- Forum Mod - Wizards

- Posts: 70,723
- And1: 23,219
- Joined: Oct 28, 2002
Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVII
getrichordie wrote:Eli Babak wrote:getrichordie wrote:Why are you so focused on Adams? What about the cap relief and flexibility Washington is gaining here?
Washington isn't FA destination and you saw what Ernie did in 2016 with all that cap space.
It's obvious that (at least) one of Wall/Beal/Porter will be eventually traded. Beal has the most value but moving Wall would be the best for the franchise. Let's pray Lakers are dumb enough to make that trade.
So are you just saying Washington can’t get better? They are going to have to have to stay close to cap as possible until they figure out who is in their long-term view. The Wall/Beal/Porter ship has sailed and all of them will have to be moved for a prosperous future in Washington. While they figure out who fits into their long-term view, they can at least NOT pay a ton of money.
Where the heck do you get these ideas? Why would all of Wall/Beal/Porter need to be moved? Just because you keep saying it over and over, doesn't make it reality. Beal and Porter are 25 years old and locked into contracts. There is no need to send them anywhere. The decision to trade them will be based solely on the return.
Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVII
-
AFM
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,668
- And1: 8,911
- Joined: May 25, 2012
-
Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVII
nate33 wrote:AFM wrote:Only the Wizards would be dumb enough to turn down that Lakers trade for Wall, assuming it's real, and if Kev say so, it probably is.
Instead they'll dump Wall in a year or two when his value is at an all time low. Maybe after an injury.
We don't know if they'll turn it down or not. Nothing can happen until December 15th as long as either KCP (or Rondo) is involved.
I really hope they take the deal though. This team needs to be shaken up.
I could see Ted having a major problem trading Wall. Wall symbolizes his plan of rebuilding through the draft. Trading him would be admission that his plan failed.
That being said, I know a guy who got tickets to the Cavs game a few weeks ago from Ted. He asked for free tickets saying he was a huge Cavs fan and he "didn't care that his Cavs are terrible" and Ted responded "we're terrible too, I'll give you tickets to the game."
Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVII
- daSwami
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,284
- And1: 563
- Joined: Jun 14, 2002
- Location: Charlottesville
-
Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVII
Praying the Lakers lose every game between now and Dec. 15th. Even an incompetent GM can fleece a desperate Lebron.
Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVII
-
stilldropin20
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,370
- And1: 1,233
- Joined: Jul 31, 2002
-
Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVII
nate33 wrote:sogood wrote:Rumors is BS IMO. Wow and Windhorst said the Lakers refused to give up Ingram in any deal for Kawhi, they're not going to give the farm for Wall.
I don't expect the Lakers to give up the farm for Wall. I'd be happy with expiring contracts and one pick/prospect. Whether that's Ball, Ingram, Hart, or a future pick, I don't really care.
I assume that Ball makes the most sense for LA since LA would be getting back a PG in Wall (and Ball also has a bigger contract).
if im the wizards try like heck to get ball for wall. I think Ball is Kidd type and ready for a much larger role.
like i said, its a full rebuild.
Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVII
-
payitforward
- RealGM
- Posts: 24,934
- And1: 9,273
- Joined: May 02, 2012
- Location: On the Atlantic
Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVII
AFM wrote:nate33 wrote:AFM wrote:Only the Wizards would be dumb enough to turn down that Lakers trade for Wall, assuming it's real, and if Kev say so, it probably is.
Instead they'll dump Wall in a year or two when his value is at an all time low. Maybe after an injury.
We don't know if they'll turn it down or not. Nothing can happen until December 15th as long as either KCP (or Rondo) is involved.
I really hope they take the deal though. This team needs to be shaken up.
I could see Ted having a major problem trading Wall. Wall symbolizes his plan of rebuilding through the draft. Trading him would be admission that his plan failed.
That being said, I know a guy who got tickets to the Cavs game a few weeks ago from Ted. He asked for free tickets saying he was a huge Cavs fan and he "didn't care that his Cavs are terrible" and Ted responded "we're terrible too, I'll give you tickets to the game."
That's really funny! We were 4-9 before that game, so Ted was right.
Since beating the truly awful Cavs that night, we've recorded six wins. We've beaten the Knicks, Nets & Hawks. We've vanquished NO in our building w/o Anthony Davis. We've beaten Houston with no bench. & we've won a nice game vs. the Clippers.
That means we are no longer terrible. That guy you know might as well not ask Ted for any more tix!!
Btw, how did he contact him?
Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVII
-
dckingsfan
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,350
- And1: 20,739
- Joined: May 28, 2010
Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVII
getrichordie wrote:...
How about Wall for Roberson, Abrines, Patterson and Luwawu-Cabarrot?
Think about a Wall/Westbrook backcourt. Probably the best trade idea so far, right?
Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVII
-
payitforward
- RealGM
- Posts: 24,934
- And1: 9,273
- Joined: May 02, 2012
- Location: On the Atlantic
Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVII
AFM wrote:I could see Ted having a major problem trading Wall. Wall symbolizes his plan of rebuilding through the draft. Trading him would be admission that his plan failed.
Rebuilding through the draft? That ship sailed long ago -- no, that ship sank in the harbor!
We've got 5 guys out of the last 10 drafts despite having 26 picks to use -- no, make that 29 picks including future picks that are already traded away.
Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVII
-
payitforward
- RealGM
- Posts: 24,934
- And1: 9,273
- Joined: May 02, 2012
- Location: On the Atlantic
Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVII
dckingsfan wrote:getrichordie wrote:...
How about Wall for Roberson, Abrines, Patterson and Luwawu-Cabarrot?
Think about a Wall/Westbrook backcourt. Probably the best trade idea so far, right?
Better yet, since Grodie wants to move Adams, how about Wall & Smith for Adams, Diallo, Noel, & that virtually worthless, sure to be late, R1 pick in 2019?
That Wall/Westbrook backcourt would get over 20 assists per game. & score more than 50 points a game. It's a can't miss, slam dunk (lots of those too).
What do you say, Grichor?
Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVII
-
AFM
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,668
- And1: 8,911
- Joined: May 25, 2012
-
Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVII
payitforward wrote:
Btw, how did he contact him?
Ted comes into his store in Potomac
Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVII
- Chocolate City Jordanaire
- RealGM
- Posts: 55,071
- And1: 10,579
- Joined: Aug 05, 2001
-
Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVII
I think Wall would be best in Phoenix.
I also think with Houston flailing there could be a three-way deal that would join CP3 with Lebron while sending Wall to the Rockets.
Sent from my SM-J337T using RealGM mobile app
I also think with Houston flailing there could be a three-way deal that would join CP3 with Lebron while sending Wall to the Rockets.
Sent from my SM-J337T using RealGM mobile app











