Dat2U wrote:nate33 wrote:80sballboy wrote:
Yes, time to deal Beal. Might as well tank next season with young players.
They're not trading Beal. They're still running a business and it's better to win 35 games than 22 games. And with the way the lottery odds have changed, your prospects of getting a top pick with the 9th worst record in the league aren't much worse than they are with the worst record in the league.
Think about it. In this draft, the 8th seed got the top pick, the 7th seed got the 2nd pick, and the 11th seed got the 4th pick. Why tank your way down to the bottom three?
The goal isn't tanking, the goal is getting the most for Beal while you can because you cannot win with him right now and eventually he's going to request a trade. I know he's playing the good soldier right now but all-NBA type players grow tired of 32-win type seasons very quickly.
Trading Bradley Beal for Ja Morant and Parsons is tanking. These trades you’ve been suggesting are tanking moves that will decimate the viability of the franchise for far longer than the duration of Wall or Beal’s contracts.
Beal has firmly indicated that he’s not demanding a trade. You don’t trade a 25yo All-NBA player prematurely because you’re scared that he *might* ask for a trade down the line. If he wants out then you cross that bridge then